CFI: Strip auto traits off Virtual calls
We already use `Instance` at declaration sites when available to glean additional information about possible abstractions of the type in use. This does the same when possible at callsites as well.
The primary purpose of this change is to allow CFI to alter how it generates type information for indirect calls through `Virtual` instances.
This is needed for the "separate machinery" version of my approach to the vtable issues (#122573), because we need to respond differently to a `Virtual` call to the same type as a non-virtual call, specifically [stripping auto traits off the receiver's `Self`](54b15b0c36) because there isn't a separate vtable for `Foo` vs `Foo + Send`.
This would also make a more general underlying mechanism that could be used by rcvalle's [proposed drop detection / encoding](edcd1e20a1) if we end up using his approach, as we could condition out on the `def_id` in the CFI code rather than requiring the generating code to explicitly note whether it was calling drop.
CFI: Support self_cell-like recursion
Current `transform_ty` attempts to avoid cycles when normalizing `#[repr(transparent)]` types to their interior, but runs afoul of this pattern used in `self_cell`:
```
struct X<T> {
x: u8,
p: PhantomData<T>,
}
#[repr(transparent)]
struct Y(X<Y>);
```
When attempting to normalize Y, it will still cycle indefinitely. By using a types-visited list, this will instead get expanded exactly one layer deep to X<Y>, and then stop, not attempting to normalize `Y` any further.
This PR was split off from #121962 as part of fixing the larger vtable compatibility issues.
r? ``````@workingjubilee``````
Fix compile of wasm64-unknown-unknown target
This target is a Tier 3 target so it's not tested on CI, and it's broken since last used so this commit fixes a small unwind-related issue that cropped up in the meantime.
Mention Register Size in `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]`
Fixes#121593
Displays the register size information obtained from `suggest_modifier()` and `default_modifier()`.
While `const` has a particular meaning about language guarantees, here
we need a fuzzier notion like whether constant propagation was
effective, and `statically_known` is the best term we have for now.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #121281 (regression test for #103626)
- #122168 (Fix validation on substituted callee bodies in MIR inliner)
- #122217 (Handle str literals written with `'` lexed as lifetime)
- #122379 (transmute: caution against int2ptr transmutation)
- #122840 (`rustdoc --test`: Prevent reaching the maximum size of command-line by using files for arguments if there are too many)
- #122907 (Uniquify `ReError` on input mode in canonicalizer)
- #122942 (Add test in higher ranked subtype)
- #122943 (add a couple more ice tests)
- #122963 (core/panicking: fix outdated comment)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add test in higher ranked subtype
I'm a beginner in this repository, and there are some things I'm not sure about:
- Is it okay that there is a warning:
```
rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [?1t, '^0.Named(DefId(0:15 ~ structually_relate_aliases[de75]::{impl#1}::'a), "'a")], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ structually_relate_aliases[de75]::ToUnit::Unit) }
```
- Is it okay that there are two duplicate errors in the same line?
- Did I put the test in the right place?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Fixes#121649
`rustdoc --test`: Prevent reaching the maximum size of command-line by using files for arguments if there are too many
Fixes#122722.
Thanks to this I discovered that rust was using ``@`` to add arguments from a file, quite convenient.
If there are too many `cfg` arguments given to `rustdoc --test`, it'll now put them into a temporary file and passing it as argument to the rustc command.
I added a test with 100_000 `cfg` arguments to ensure it'll not break again.
r? `@notrid`
transmute: caution against int2ptr transmutation
This came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121282.
Cc ```@saethlin``` ```@scottmcm```
Eventually we'll add a proper description of provenance that we can reference, but that's a bunch of work and it's unclear who will have the time to do that when. Meanwhile, let's at least do what we can without mentioning provenance explicitly.
Handle str literals written with `'` lexed as lifetime
Given `'hello world'` and `'1 str', provide a structured suggestion for a valid string literal:
```
error[E0762]: unterminated character literal
--> $DIR/lex-bad-str-literal-as-char-3.rs:2:26
|
LL | println!('hello world');
| ^^^^
|
help: if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes
|
LL | println!("hello world");
| ~ ~
```
```
error[E0762]: unterminated character literal
--> $DIR/lex-bad-str-literal-as-char-1.rs:2:20
|
LL | println!('1 + 1');
| ^^^^
|
help: if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes
|
LL | println!("1 + 1");
| ~ ~
```
Fix#119685.
Fix validation on substituted callee bodies in MIR inliner
When inlining a coroutine, we will substitute the MIR body with the args of the call. There is code in the MIR validator that attempts to prevent query cycles, and will use the coroutine body directly when it detects that's the body that's being validated. That means that when inlining a coroutine body that has been substituted, it may no longer be parameterized over the original args of the coroutine, which will lead to substitution ICEs.
Fixes#119064
refactor check_{lang,library}_ub: use a single intrinsic
This enacts the plan I laid out [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122282#issuecomment-1996917998): use a single intrinsic, called `ub_checks` (in aniticpation of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/725), that just exposes the value of `debug_assertions` (consistently implemented in both codegen and the interpreter). Put the language vs library UB logic into the library.
This makes it easier to do something like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122282 in the future: that just slightly alters the semantics of `ub_checks` (making it more approximating when crates built with different flags are mixed), but it no longer affects whether these checks can happen in Miri or compile-time.
The first commit just moves things around; I don't think these macros and functions belong into `intrinsics.rs` as they are not intrinsics.
r? `@saethlin`
