Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119817 (Remove special-casing around `AliasKind::Opaque` when structurally resolving in new solver)
- #119819 (Check rust lints when an unknown lint is detected)
- #119872 (Give me a way to emit all the delayed bugs as errors (add `-Zeagerly-emit-delayed-bugs`))
- #119877 (Add more information to `visit_projection_elem`)
- #119884 (Rename `--env` option flag to `--env-set`)
- #119885 (Revert #113923)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add more information to `visit_projection_elem`
Without the starting place, it's hard to retrieve any useful information from visiting a projection.
Note: I still need to add a test.
Give me a way to emit all the delayed bugs as errors (add `-Zeagerly-emit-delayed-bugs`)
This is probably a *better* way to inspect all the delayed bugs in a program that what exists currently (and therefore makes it very easy to choose the right number `N` with `-Zemit-err-as-bug=N`, though I guess the naming is a bit ironic when you pair both of the flags together, but that feels like naming bikeshed more than anything).
This pacifies my only concern with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119871#issuecomment-1888170259, because (afaict?) that PR doesn't allow you to intercept a delayed bug's stack trace anymore, which as someone who debugs the compiler a lot, is something that I can *promise* that I do.
r? `@nnethercote` or `@oli-obk`
Remove special-casing around `AliasKind::Opaque` when structurally resolving in new solver
This fixes a few inconsistencies around where we don't eagerly resolve opaques to their (locally-defined) hidden types in the new solver. It essentially allows this code to work:
```rust
fn main() {
type Tait = impl Sized;
struct S {
i: i32,
}
let x: Tait = S { i: 0 };
println!("{}", x.i);
}
```
Since `Tait` is defined in `main`, we are able to poke through the type of `x` with deref.
r? lcnr
Exhaustiveness: track overlapping ranges precisely
The `overlapping_range_endpoints` lint has false positives, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117648. I expected that removing these false positives would have too much of a perf impact but never measured it. This PR is an experiment to see if the perf loss is manageable.
r? `@ghost`
Register even erroneous impls
Otherwise the specialization graph fails to pick it up, even though other code assumes that all impl blocks have an entry in the specialization graph.
also includes an unrelated cleanup of the specialization graph query
fixes #119827
Set `c_str_literals` stabilization version back to `CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION`
`c_str_literals`'s stabilization has been delayed to 1.77 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119528).
next solver: provisional cache
this adds the cache removed in #115843. However, it should now correctly track whether a provisional result depends on an inductive or coinductive stack.
While working on this, I was using the following doc: https://hackmd.io/VsQPjW3wSTGUSlmgwrDKOA. I don't think it's too helpful to understanding this, but am somewhat hopeful that the inline comments are more useful.
There are quite a few future perf improvements here. Given that this is already very involved I don't believe it is worth it (for now). While working on this PR one of my few attempts to significantly improve perf ended up being unsound again because I was not careful enough ✨
r? `@compiler-errors`
libtest: Fix padding of benchmarks run as tests
### Summary
The first commit adds regression tests for libtest padding.
The second commit fixes padding for benches run as tests and updates the blessed output of the regression tests to make it clear what effect the fix has on padding.
Closes#104092 which is **E-help-wanted** and **regression-from-stable-to-stable**
### More details
Before this fix we applied padding _before_ manually doing what `convert_benchmarks_to_tests()` does which affects padding calculations. Instead use `convert_benchmarks_to_tests()` first if applicable and then apply padding afterwards so it becomes correct.
Benches should only be padded when run as benches to make it easy to compare the benchmark numbers. Not when run as tests.
r? `@ghost` until CI passes.
Add Benchmarks for int_pow Methods.
There is quite a bit of room for improvement in performance of the `int_pow` family of methods. I added benchmarks for those functions. In particular, there are benchmarks for small compile-time bases to measure the effect of #114390. ~~I added a lot (245), but all but 22 of them are marked with `#[ignore]`. There are a lot of macros, and I would appreciate feedback on how to simplify them.~~
~~To run benches relevant to #114390, use `./x bench core --stage 1 -- pow_base_const --include-ignored`.~~
There are two places that handle normal delayed bugs. This commit
factors out some repeated code.
Also, we can use `std::mem::take` instead of `std::mem::replace`.
