Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88292 (Enable --generate-link-to-definition for rustc's docs)
- #88729 (Recover from `Foo(a: 1, b: 2)`)
- #88875 (cleanup(rustc_trait_selection): remove vestigial code from rustc_on_unimplemented)
- #88892 (Move object safety suggestions to the end of the error)
- #88928 (Document the closure arguments for `reduce`.)
- #88976 (Clean up and add doc comments for CStr)
- #88983 (Allow calling `get_body_with_borrowck_facts` without `-Z polonius`)
- #88985 (Update clobber_abi list to include k[1-7] regs)
- #88986 (Update the backtrace crate)
- #89009 (Fix typo in `break` docs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Querying layout of a generator requires its optimized MIR. Thus
computing layout during MIR optimization of a generator might create a
query cycle. Disable RemoveZsts in generators to avoid the issue
(similar approach is used in ConstProp transform already).
Introduce NullOp::AlignOf
This PR introduces `Rvalue::NullaryOp(NullOp::AlignOf, ty)`, which will be lowered from `align_of`, similar to `size_of` lowering to `Rvalue::NullaryOp(NullOp::SizeOf, ty)`.
The changes are originally part of #88700 but since it's not dependent on other changes and could have performance impact on its own, it's separated into its own PR.
Add -Z panic-in-drop={unwind,abort} command-line option
This PR changes `Drop` to abort if an unwinding panic attempts to escape it, making the process abort instead. This has several benefits:
- The current behavior when unwinding out of `Drop` is very unintuitive and easy to miss: unwinding continues, but the remaining drops in scope are simply leaked.
- A lot of unsafe code doesn't expect drops to unwind, which can lead to unsoundness:
- https://github.com/servo/rust-smallvec/issues/14
- https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec/issues/3
- There is a code size and compilation time cost to this: LLVM needs to generate extra landing pads out of all calls in a drop implementation. This can compound when functions are inlined since unwinding will then continue on to process drops in the callee, which can itself unwind, etc.
- Initial measurements show a 3% size reduction and up to 10% compilation time reduction on some crates (`syn`).
One thing to note about `-Z panic-in-drop=abort` is that *all* crates must be built with this option for it to be sound since it makes the compiler assume that dropping `Box<dyn Any>` will never unwind.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/97
generic_const_exprs: use thir for abstract consts instead of mir
Changes `AbstractConst` building to use `thir` instead of `mir` so that there's less chance of consts unifying when they shouldn't because lowering to mir dropped information (see `abstract-consts-as-cast-5.rs` test)
r? `@lcnr`
Encode spans relative to the enclosing item
The aim of this PR is to avoid recomputing queries when code is moved without modification.
MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/443
This is achieved by :
1. storing the HIR owner LocalDefId information inside the span;
2. encoding and decoding spans relative to the enclosing item in the incremental on-disk cache;
3. marking a dependency to the `source_span(LocalDefId)` query when we translate a span from the short (`Span`) representation to its explicit (`SpanData`) representation.
Since all client code uses `Span`, step 3 ensures that all manipulations
of span byte positions actually create the dependency edge between
the caller and the `source_span(LocalDefId)`.
This query return the actual absolute span of the parent item.
As a consequence, any source code motion that changes the absolute byte position of a node will either:
- modify the distance to the parent's beginning, so change the relative span's hash;
- dirty `source_span`, and trigger the incremental recomputation of all code that
depends on the span's absolute byte position.
With this scheme, I believe the dependency tracking to be accurate.
For the moment, the spans are marked during lowering.
I'd rather do this during def-collection,
but the AST MutVisitor is not practical enough just yet.
The only difference is that we attach macro-expanded spans
to their expansion point instead of the macro itself.
