rustc_mir: track inlined callees in SourceScopeData.
We now record which MIR scopes are the roots of *other* (inlined) functions's scope trees, which allows us to generate the correct debuginfo in codegen, similar to what LLVM inlining generates.
This PR makes the `ui` test `backtrace-debuginfo` pass, if the MIR inliner is turned on by default.
Also, `#[track_caller]` is now correct in the face of MIR inlining (cc `@anp).`
Fixes#76997.
r? `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt`
Add cg_clif as optional codegen backend
Rustc_codegen_cranelift is an alternative codegen backend for rustc based on Cranelift. It has the potential to improve compilation times in debug mode. In my experience the compile time improvements over debug mode LLVM for a clean build are about 20-30% in most cases.
This PR adds cg_clif as optional codegen backend. By default it is only enabled for `./x.py check`. It can be enabled for `./x.py build` too by adding `cranelift` to the `rust.codegen-backends` array in `config.toml`.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/270
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #74477 (`#[deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in sys/wasm)
- #77836 (transmute_copy: explain that alignment is handled correctly)
- #78126 (Properly define va_arg and va_list for aarch64-apple-darwin)
- #78137 (Initialize tracing subscriber in compiletest tool)
- #78161 (Add issue template link to IRLO)
- #78214 (Tweak match arm semicolon removal suggestion to account for futures)
- #78247 (Fix#78192)
- #78252 (Add codegen test for #45964)
- #78268 (Do not try to report on closures to avoid ICE)
- #78295 (Add some regression tests)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
Tweak match arm semicolon removal suggestion to account for futures
* Tweak and extend "use `.await`" suggestions
* Suggest removal of semicolon on prior match arm
* Account for `impl Future` when suggesting semicolon removal
* Silence some errors when encountering `await foo()?` as can't be certain what the intent was
*Thanks to https://twitter.com/a_hoverbear/status/1318960787105353728 for pointing this out!*
Properly define va_arg and va_list for aarch64-apple-darwin
From [Apple][]:
> Because of these changes, the type `va_list` is an alias for `char*`,
> and not for the struct type in the generic procedure call standard.
With this change `/x.py test --stage 1 src/test/ui/abi/variadic-ffi`
passes.
Fixes#78092
[Apple]: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing_arm64_code_for_apple_platforms
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #77984 (Compute proper module parent during resolution)
- #78085 (MIR validation should check `SwitchInt` values are valid for the type)
- #78208 (replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s)
- #78209 (Update `compiler_builtins` to 0.1.36)
- #78276 (Bump backtrace-rs to enable Mach-O support on iOS.)
- #78320 (Link to cargo's `build-std` feature instead of `xargo` in custom target docs)
- #78322 (BTreeMap: stop mistaking node::MIN_LEN for a node level constraint)
- #78326 (Split out statement attributes changes from #78306)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s
`#[allow_internal_unstable]` is currently used to side-step feature gate and stability checks.
While it was originally only meant to be used only on macros, its use was expanded to `const fn`s.
This pr adds stricter checks for the usage of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` (only on macros) and introduces the `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` attribute for usage on `const fn`s.
This pr does not change any of the functionality associated with the use of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on macros or the usage of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (instead of `#[allow_internal_unstable]`) on `const fn`s (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69399#issuecomment-712911540).
Note: The check for `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` currently only validates that the attribute is used on a function, because I don't know how I would check if the function is a `const fn` at the place of the check. I therefore openend this as a 'draft pull request'.
Closesrust-lang/rust#69399
r? @oli-obk
Compute proper module parent during resolution
Fixes#75982
The direct parent of a module may not be a module
(e.g. `const _: () = { #[path = "foo.rs"] mod foo; };`).
To find the parent of a module for purposes of resolution, we need to
walk up the tree until we hit a module or a crate root.
perf: buffer SipHasher128
This is an attempt to improve Siphasher128 performance by buffering input. Although it reduces instruction count, I'm not confident the effect on wall times, or lack-thereof, is worth the change.
---
Additional notes not reflected in source comments:
* Implementation choices were guided by a combination of results from rustc-perf and micro-benchmarks, mostly the former.
* ~~I tried a couple of different struct layouts that might be more cache friendly with no obvious effect.~~ Update: a particular struct layout was chosen, but it's not critical to performance. See comments in source and discussion below.
* I suspect that buffering would be important to a SIMD-accelerated algorithm, but from what I've read and my own tests, SipHash does not seem very amenable to SIMD acceleration, at least by SSE.
fix def collector for impl trait
fixes#77329
We now consistently make `impl Trait` a hir owner, requiring some special casing for synthetic generic params.
r? `@eddyb`
Upgrade to measureme 9.0.0
I believe I did this correctly but there's still a reference to `measureme@0.7.1` coming from `rustc-ap-rustc_data_structures` and I'm not sure how to resolve that.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
We'll also need to deploy the new version of the tools on perf.rlo.
stop promoting union field accesses in 'const'
Turns out that promotion of union field accesses is the only difference between "promotion in `const`/`static` bodies" and "explicit promotion". So if we can remove this, we have finally achieved what I thought to already be the case -- that the bodies of `const`/`static` initializers behave the same as explicit promotion contexts.
The reason we do not want to promote union field accesses is that they can introduce UB, i.e., they can go wrong. We want to [minimize the ways promoteds can fail to evaluate](https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/53). Also this change makes things more consistent overall, removing a special case that was added without much consideration (as far as I can tell).
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #75115 (`#[deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in sys/cloudabi)
- #76614 (change the order of type arguments on ControlFlow)
- #77610 (revise Hermit's mutex interface to support the behaviour of StaticMutex)
- #77830 (Simplify query proc-macros)
- #77930 (Do not ICE with TraitPredicates containing [type error])
- #78069 (Fix const core::panic!(non_literal_str).)
- #78072 (Cleanup constant matching in exhaustiveness checking)
- #78119 (Throw core::panic!("message") as &str instead of String.)
- #78191 (Introduce a temporary for discriminant value in MatchBranchSimplification)
- #78272 (const_evaluatable_checked: deal with unused nodes + div)
- #78318 (TyCtxt: generate single impl block with `slice_interners` macro)
- #78327 (resolve: Relax macro resolution consistency check to account for any errors)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
resolve: Relax macro resolution consistency check to account for any errors
The check was previously omitted only when ambiguity errors or `Res::Err` were encountered, but the "macro-expanded `extern crate` items cannot shadow..." error (at least) can cause same inconsistencies as well.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78325
Introduce a temporary for discriminant value in MatchBranchSimplification
The optimization introduces additional uses of the discriminant operand, but
does not ensure that it is still valid to evaluate it or that it still
evaluates to the same value.
Evaluate it once at original position, and store the result in a new temporary.
Follow up on #78151. The optimization remains disabled by default.
Closes#78239.
Cleanup constant matching in exhaustiveness checking
This supercedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77390. I made the `Opaque` constructor work.
I have opened two issues https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78071 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78057 from the discussion we had on the previous PR. They are not regressions nor directly related to the current PR so I thought we'd deal with them separately.
I left a FIXME somewhere because I didn't know how to compare string constants for equality. There might even be some unicode things that need to happen there. In the meantime I preserved previous behavior.
EDIT: I accidentally fixed#78071
Fix const core::panic!(non_literal_str).
Invocations of `core::panic!(x)` where `x` is not a string literal expand to `panic!("{}", x)`, which is not understood by the const panic logic right now. This adds `panic_str` as a lang item, and modifies the const eval implementation to hook into this item as well.
This fixes the issue mentioned here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51999#issuecomment-687604248
r? `@RalfJung`
`@rustbot` modify labels: +A-const-eval
Simplify query proc-macros
The query code generation is split between proc-macros and regular macros in `rustc_middle::ty::query`.
This PR removes unused capabilities of the proc-macros, and tend to use regular macros for the logic.
change the order of type arguments on ControlFlow
This allows ControlFlow<BreakType> which is much more ergonomic for common iterator combinator use cases.
Addresses one component of #75744
Unconditionally capture tokens for attributes.
This allows us to avoid synthesizing tokens in `prepend_attr`, since we
have the original tokens available.
We still need to synthesize tokens when expanding `cfg_attr`,
but this is an unavoidable consequence of the syntax of `cfg_attr` -
the user does not supply the `#` and `[]` tokens that a `cfg_attr`
expands to.
This is based on PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77250 - this PR exposes a bug in the current `collect_tokens` implementation, which is fixed by the rewrite.
Fixes#75982
The direct parent of a module may not be a module
(e.g. `const _: () = { #[path = "foo.rs"] mod foo; };`).
To find the parent of a module for purposes of resolution, we need to
walk up the tree until we hit a module or a crate root.
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
