Store static initializers in metadata instead of the MIR of statics.
This means that adding generic statics would be even more difficult, as we can't evaluate statics from other crates anymore, but the subtle issue I have encountered make me think that having this be an explicit problem is better.
The issue is that
```rust
static mut FOO: &mut u32 = &mut 42;
static mut BAR = unsafe { FOO };
```
gets different allocations, instead of referring to the same one. This is also true for non-static mut, but promotion makes `static FOO: &u32 = &42;` annoying to demo.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61345
## Why is this being done?
In order to ensure all crates see the same nested allocations (which is the last issue that needs fixing before we can stabilize [`const_mut_refs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349)), I am working on creating anonymous (from the Rust side, to LLVM it's like a regular static item) static items for the nested allocations in a static. If we evaluate the static item in a downstream crate again, we will end up duplicating its nested allocations (and in some cases, like the `match` case, even duplicate the main allocation).
Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter.
Reinstate some delayed bugs.
These were changed to `has_errors` assertions in #121071 because that seemed reasonable, but evidently not.
Fixes#121103.
Fixes#121108.
Do not report overflow errors on ConstArgHasType goals
This is 10% of a fix for #121090, since it at least means that we no longer mention the `ConstArgHasType` goal as the cause for the overflow. Instead, now we mention:
```
overflow evaluating the requirement `{closure@$DIR/overflow-during-mono.rs:13:41: 13:44}: Sized`
```
which is not much better, but slightly.
r? oli-obk
Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors
The ICEs fixed here were probably reachable through const eval gymnastics before, but now they are easily reachable without that, too.
The new errors are often bugfixes, where useful errors were missing, because they were reported after the early abort. In other cases sometimes they are just duplication of already emitted errors, which won't be user-visible due to deduplication.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120860
Fix two UI tests with incorrect directive / invalid revision
- `tests/ui/borrowck/copy-suggestion-region-vid.rs` had a `ui_test`-style directive on compiletest: `//`@run-rustfix`.`
- `tests/ui/asm/inline-syntax.rs` has directives for a undeclared revision `[x86_64_allowed]` which seems to have the same directives as declared revision `[x86_64]`.
Fix suggestion span for `?Sized` when param type has default
Fixes#120878
Diagnostic suggests adding `: ?Sized` in an incorrect place if a type parameter default is present
r? `@fmease`
Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety
#120275 no longer checks bare traits for object safety when making a `dyn` suggestion on Rust < 2021. In this case, qualify the suggestion with a note that the trait must be object safe, to prevent user confusion as seen in #116434
r? ```@fmease```
`cargo update`
Run `cargo update`, with some pinning and fixes necessitated by that. This *should* unblock #112865
There's a couple of places where I only pinned a dependency in one location - this seems like a bit of a hack, but better than duplicating the FIXME across all `Cargo.toml` where a dependency is introduced.
cc `@Nilstrieb`
Do not assemble candidates for default impls
There is no reason (as far as I can tell?) that we should assemble an impl candidate for a default impl. This candidate itself does not prove that the impl holds, and any time that it *does* hold, there will be a more specializing non-default impl that also is assembled.
This is because `default impl<T> Foo for T {}` actually expands to `impl<T> Foo for T where T: Foo {}`. The only way to satisfy that where clause (without coinduction) is via *another* implementation that does hold -- precisely an impl that specializes it.
This should fix the specialization related regressions for #116494. That should lead to one root crate regression that doesn't have to do with specialization, which I think we can regress.
r? lcnr cc ``@rust-lang/types``
cc #31844
Check normalized call signature for WF in mir typeck
Unfortunately we don't check that the built-in implementations for `Fn*` traits are actually well-formed in the same way that we do for user-provided impls.
Essentially, when checking a call terminator, we end up with a signature that references an unnormalized `<[closure] as FnOnce<...>>::Output` in its output. That output type, due to the built-in impl, doesn't follow the expected rule that `WF(ty)` implies `WF(normalized(ty))`. We fix this by also checking the normalized signature here.
**See** boxy's detailed and useful explanation comment which explains this in more detail: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114936#issuecomment-1710388741Fixes#114936Fixes#118876
r? types
cc ``@BoxyUwU`` ``@lcnr``
match lowering: simplify block creation
Match lowering was doing complicated things with block creation. As far as I can tell it was trying to avoid creating unneeded blocks, but of the three places that start out with `otherwise = &mut None`, two of them called `otherwise.unwrap_or_else(|| self.cfg.start_new_block())` anyway. As far as I can tell the only place where this PR makes a difference is in `lower_match_tree`, which did indeed sometimes avoid creating the unreachable final block + FakeRead. Unless this is important I propose we do the naive thing instead.
I have not checked all the graph isomorphisms by hand, but at a glance the test diff looks sensible.
r? `@matthewjasper`
modify alias-relate to also normalize ambiguous opaques
allows a bunch of further cleanups and generally simplifies the type system. To handle https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/8 we'll have to add a some additional complexity to the `(Alias, Infer)` branches in alias-relate, so removing the opaque type special case here is really valuable.
It does worsen `deduce_closure_signature` and friends even more as they now receive an inference variable which is only constrained via an `AliasRelate` goal. These probably have to look into alias relate goals somehow. Leaving that for a future PR as this is something we'll have to tackle regardless.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Update to LLVM 18
LLVM 18 final is planned to be released on Mar 5th. Rust 1.78 is planned to be released on May 2nd.
Tested images: dist-x86_64-linux, dist-s390x-linux, dist-aarch64-linux, dist-riscv64-linux, dist-loongarch64-linux, dist-x86_64-freebsd, dist-x86_64-illumos, dist-x86_64-musl, x86_64-linux-integration, test-various, armhf-gnu, i686-msvc, x86_64-msvc, i686-mingw, x86_64-mingw, x86_64-apple-1, x86_64-apple-2, dist-aarch64-apple
r? `@ghost`
This test started failing on LLVM 18 after change
61118ffd04. As far as I can tell, it's
just good fortune that LLVM is able to sniff out the new noalias here,
and it's correct.
Provide more suggestions on invalid equality where bounds
```
error: equality constraints are not yet supported in `where` clauses
--> $DIR/equality-bound.rs:50:9
|
LL | IntoIterator::Item = A
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not supported
|
= note: see issue #20041 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20041> for more information
help: if `IntoIterator::Item` is an associated type you're trying to set, use the associated type binding syntax
|
LL ~ fn from_iter<T: IntoIterator<Item = A>>(_: T) -> Self
LL ~
|
error: equality constraints are not yet supported in `where` clauses
--> $DIR/equality-bound.rs:63:9
|
LL | T::Item = A
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ not supported
|
= note: see issue #20041 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20041> for more information
help: if `IntoIterator::Item` is an associated type you're trying to set, use the associated type binding syntax
|
LL ~ fn from_iter<T: IntoIterator<Item = A>>(_: T) -> Self
LL ~
|
```
Fix#68982.
Properly handle `async` block and `async fn` in `if` exprs without `else`
When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the `async fn`.
We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.
Fix#115405.
