slice::from_raw_parts: mention no-wrap-around condition
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83996. This probably needs to be mentioned in more places, so I am not closing that issue, but this here should help at least.
Warn on unused `offset_of!()` result
The usage of `core::hint::must_use()` means that we don't get a specialized message. I figured out that since there are plenty of other methods that just have `#[must_use]` with no message it'll be fine, but it is a bit unfortunate that the error mentions `must_use` and not `offset_of!`.
Fixes#111669.
Add `implement_via_object` to `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` to control object candidate assembly
Some built-in traits are special, since they are used to prove facts about the program that are important for later phases of compilation such as codegen and CTFE. For example, the `Unsize` trait is used to assert to the compiler that we are able to unsize a type into another type. It doesn't have any methods because it doesn't actually *instruct* the compiler how to do this unsizing, but this is later used (alongside an exhaustive match of combinations of unsizeable types) during codegen to generate unsize coercion code.
Due to this, these built-in traits are incompatible with the type erasure provided by object types. For example, the existence of `dyn Unsize<T>` does not mean that the compiler is able to unsize `Box<dyn Unsize<T>>` into `Box<T>`, since `Unsize` is a *witness* to the fact that a type can be unsized, and it doesn't actually encode that unsizing operation in its vtable as mentioned above.
The old trait solver gets around this fact by having complex control flow that never considers object bounds for certain built-in traits:
2f896da247/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs (L61-L132)
However, candidate assembly in the new solver is much more lovely, and I'd hate to add this list of opt-out cases into the new solver. Instead of maintaining this complex and hard-coded control flow, instead we can make this a property of the trait via a built-in attribute. We already have such a build attribute that's applied to every single trait that we care about: `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`. This PR adds `implement_via_object` as a meta-item to that attribute that allows us to opt a trait out of object-bound candidate assembly as well.
r? `@lcnr`
Use BorrowFlag instead of explicit isize
The integer type tracking borrow count has a typedef called `BorrowFlag`. This type should be used instead of explicit `isize`.
[doc] `poll_fn`: explain how to `pin` captured state safely
Usage of `Pin::new_unchecked(&mut …)` is dangerous with `poll_fn`, even though the `!Unpin`-infectiousness has made things smoother. Nonetheless, there are easy ways to avoid the need for any `unsafe` altogether, be it through `Box::pin`ning, or the `pin!` macro. Since the latter only works within an `async` context, showing an example artificially introducing one ought to help people navigate this subtlety with safety and confidence.
## Preview
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9920355/230092494-da22fdcb-0b8f-4ff4-a2ac-aa7d9ead077a.mov
```@rustbot``` label +A-docs
[libs] Simplify `unchecked_{shl,shr}`
There's no need for the `const_eval_select` dance here. And while I originally wrote the `.try_into().unwrap_unchecked()` implementation here, it's kinda a mess in MIR -- this new one is substantially simpler, as shown by the old one being above the inlining threshold but the new one being below it in the `mir-opt/inline/unchecked_shifts` tests.
We don't need `u32::checked_shl` doing a dance through both `Result` *and* `Option` 🙃
Usage of `Pin::new_unchecked(&mut …)` is dangerous with `poll_fn`, even
though the `!Unpin`-infectiousness has made things smoother.
Nonetheless, there are easy ways to avoid the need for any `unsafe`
altogether, be it through `Box::pin`ning, or the `pin!` macro. Since the
latter only works within an `async` context, showing an example
artifically introducing one ought to help people navigate this subtlety
with safety and confidence.
Launch a non-unwinding panic for misaligned pointer deref
This panic already never unwinds, but that's only because it always hits the unwind guard that's created by our `UnwindAction::Terminate`. Hitting the unwind guard generates a huge double-panic backtrace. Now we generate a normal-looking panic message when this check is hit.
r? `@thomcc`
Correct types in method descriptions of `NonZero*` types
- `$Int`: e.g. i32, usize
- `$Ty`: e.g. NonZeroI32, NonZeroUsize
|method|current description|after my changes|
|-|-|-|
|`saturating_add`|...Return `$Int`::MAX on overflow.|...Return `$Ty`::MAX on overflow.|
|`checked_abs`|...returns None if self == `$Int`::MIN.|...returns None if self == `$Ty`::MIN.|
|`checked_neg`|...returning None if self == i32::MIN.|...returning None if self == `$Ty`::MIN.|
|`saturating_neg`|...returning MAX if self == i32::MIN...|...returning `$Ty`::MAX if self == `$Ty`::MIN...|
|`saturating_mul`|...Return `$Int`::MAX...|...Return `$Ty`::MAX...|
|`saturating_pow`|...Return `$Int`::MIN or `$Int`::MAX...|...Return `$Ty`::MIN or `$Ty`::MAX...|
---
For example:
```rust
pub const fn saturating_neg(self) -> NonZeroI128
```
- current
- Saturating negation. Computes `-self`, returning `MAX` if `self == i32::MIN` instead of overflowing.
- after my changes
- Saturating negation. Computes `-self`, returning `NonZeroI128::MAX` if `self == NonZeroI128::MIN` instead of overflowing.
There's no need for the `const_eval_select` dance here. And while I originally wrote the `.try_into().unwrap_unchecked()` implementation here, it's kinda a mess in MIR -- this new one is substantially simpler, as shown by the old one being above the inlining threshold but the new one being below it.
`#[lang_item]` for `core::ptr::Unique`
Tree Borrows is about to introduce experimental special handling of `core::ptr::Unique` in Miri to give it a semantics.
As of now there does not seem to be a clean way (i.e. other than `&format!("{adt:?}") == "std::ptr::Unique"`) to check if an `AdtDef` represents a `Unique`.
r? `@RalfJung`
Draft: making a lang item
Extend `unused_must_use` to cover block exprs
Given code like
```rust
#[must_use]
fn foo() -> i32 {
42
}
fn warns() {
{
foo();
}
}
fn does_not_warn() {
{
foo()
};
}
fn main() {
warns();
does_not_warn();
}
```
### Before This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: 1 warning emitted
```
### After This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:14:9
|
14 | foo()
| ^^^^^
|
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
14 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++ +
warning: 2 warnings emitted
```
Fixes#104253.
Mention `env!` in `option_env!`'s docs
`env!` mentions that there is an alternative that returns an `Option<...>` instead of emitting a compile error.
Now `option_env!` also mentions that there is an alternative that emits a compile error instead of returning an `Option<...>`.
Update runtime guarantee for `select_nth_unstable`
#106933 changed the runtime guarantee for `select_nth_unstable` from O(n) to O(n log n), since the old guarantee wasn't actually met by the implementation at the time. Now with #107522, `select_nth_unstable` should be truly linear in runtime, so we can revert its runtime guarantee to O(n). Since #106933 was considered a bug fix, this will probably need an FCP because it counts as a new API guarantee.
r? `@Amanieu`
Ignore `core`, `alloc` and `test` tests that require unwinding on `-C panic=abort`
Some of the tests for `core` and `alloc` require unwinding through their use of `catch_unwind`. These tests fail when testing using `-C panic=abort` (in my case through a target without unwinding support, and `-Z panic-abort-tests`), while they should be ignored as they don't indicate a failure.
This PR marks all of these tests with this attribute:
```rust
#[cfg_attr(not(panic = "unwind"), ignore = "test requires unwinding support")]
```
I'm not aware of a way to test this on rust-lang/rust's CI, as we don't test any target with `-C panic=abort`, but I tested this locally on a Ferrocene target and it does indeed make the test suite pass.
Uplift `clippy::cmp_nan` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::cmp_nan` lint into rustc.
## `invalid_nan_comparisons`
~~(deny-by-default)~~ (warn-by-default)
The `invalid_nan_comparisons` lint checks comparison with `f32::NAN` or `f64::NAN` as one of the operand.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
let a = 2.3f32;
if a == f32::NAN {}
```
### Explanation
NaN does not compare meaningfully to anything – not even itself – so those comparisons are always false.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112260 (Improve document of `unsafe_code` lint)
- #112429 ([rustdoc] List matching impls on type aliases)
- #112442 (Deduplicate identical region constraints in new solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uplift `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint.
## `undropped_manually_drops`
(warn-by-default)
The `undropped_manually_drops` lint check for calls to `std::mem::drop` with a value of `std::mem::ManuallyDrop` which doesn't drop.
### Example
```rust
struct S;
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
```
### Explanation
`ManuallyDrop` does not drop it's inner value so calling `std::mem::drop` will not drop the inner value of the `ManuallyDrop` either.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting an clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` into rustc
Add `task::Waker::noop`
I have found myself reimplementing this function many times when I need a `Context` but don't have a runtime or `futures` to hand.
Prior art: [`futures::task::noop_waker`](https://docs.rs/futures/0.3/futures/task/fn.noop_waker.html) and [`futures::task::noop_waker_ref`](https://docs.rs/futures/0.3/futures/task/fn.noop_waker_ref.html)
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98286
Unresolved questions:
1. Should we also add `RawWaker::noop()`? (I don't think so, I can't think of a use case for it)
2. Should we also add `Context::noop()`? Depending on the future direction `Context` goes a "noop context" might not even make sense in future.
3. Should it be an associated constant instead? That would allow for `let cx = &mut Context::from_waker(&Waker::NOOP);` to work on one line which is pretty nice. I don't really know what the guideline is here.
r? rust-lang/libs-api `@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
