Fix ctrl-c causing reads of stdin to return empty on Windows.
Pressing ctrl+c (or ctrl+break) on Windows caused a blocking read of stdin to unblock and return empty, unlike other platforms which continue to block.
On ctrl-c, `ReadConsoleW` will return success, but also set `LastError` to `ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED`.
This change detects this case, and re-tries the call to `ReadConsoleW`.
Fixes#89177. See issue for further details.
Tested on Windows 7 and Windows 10 with both MSVC and GNU toolchains
Add `const_eval_select` intrinsic
Adds an intrinsic that calls a given function when evaluated at compiler time, but generates a call to another function when called at runtime.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/7 for previous discussion.
r? `@oli-obk.`
Improve `std:🧵:available_parallelism` docs
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74479_
This PR reworks the documentation of `std:🧵:available_parallelism`, as requested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89324#issuecomment-934343254).
## Changes
The following changes are made:
- We've removed prior mentions of "hardware threads" and instead centers the docs around "parallelism" as a resource available to a program.
- We now provide examples of when `available_parallelism` may return numbers that differ from the number of CPU cores in the host machine.
- We now mention that the amount of available parallelism may change over time.
- We make note of which platform components we don't take into account which more advanced users may want to take note of.
- The example has been updated, which should be a bit easier to use.
- We've added a docs alias to `num-cpus` which provides similar functionality to `available_parallelism`, and is one of the most popular crates on crates.io.
---
Thanks!
r? `@BurntSushi`
fix minor spelling error in Poll::ready docs
Fixes minor spelling error in the proposed `Poll::ready` docs. Not that my opinion matters, but +1 on the original PR (#89651), it reads much nicer to me than the `ready!` macro.
Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests
I threw in `std::path::Path::has_root` for funsies.
A continuation of #89718.
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to non-mutating verb methods
These are methods that could be misconstrued to mutate their input, similar to #89694. I gave each one a different custom message.
I wrote that `upgrade` and `downgrade` don't modify the input pointers. Logically they don't, but technically they do...
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to From::from and Into::into
Risk of churn: **High**
Magic 8-Ball says: **Outlook not so good**
I figured I'd put this out there. If we don't do it now maybe we save it for a rainy day.
Parent issue: #89692
r? `@joshtriplett`
Speedup int log10 branchless
This is achieved with a branchless bit-twiddling implementation of the case x < 100_000, and using this as building block.
Benchmark on an Intel i7-8700K (Coffee Lake):
```
name old ns/iter new ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
num::int_log::u8_log10_predictable 165 169 4 2.42% x 0.98
num::int_log::u8_log10_random 438 423 -15 -3.42% x 1.04
num::int_log::u8_log10_random_small 438 423 -15 -3.42% x 1.04
num::int_log::u16_log10_predictable 633 417 -216 -34.12% x 1.52
num::int_log::u16_log10_random 908 471 -437 -48.13% x 1.93
num::int_log::u16_log10_random_small 945 471 -474 -50.16% x 2.01
num::int_log::u32_log10_predictable 1,496 1,340 -156 -10.43% x 1.12
num::int_log::u32_log10_random 1,076 873 -203 -18.87% x 1.23
num::int_log::u32_log10_random_small 1,145 874 -271 -23.67% x 1.31
num::int_log::u64_log10_predictable 4,005 3,171 -834 -20.82% x 1.26
num::int_log::u64_log10_random 1,247 1,021 -226 -18.12% x 1.22
num::int_log::u64_log10_random_small 1,265 921 -344 -27.19% x 1.37
num::int_log::u128_log10_predictable 39,667 39,579 -88 -0.22% x 1.00
num::int_log::u128_log10_random 6,456 6,696 240 3.72% x 0.96
num::int_log::u128_log10_random_small 4,108 3,903 -205 -4.99% x 1.05
```
Benchmark on an M1 Mac Mini:
```
name old ns/iter new ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
num::int_log::u8_log10_predictable 143 130 -13 -9.09% x 1.10
num::int_log::u8_log10_random 375 325 -50 -13.33% x 1.15
num::int_log::u8_log10_random_small 376 325 -51 -13.56% x 1.16
num::int_log::u16_log10_predictable 500 322 -178 -35.60% x 1.55
num::int_log::u16_log10_random 794 405 -389 -48.99% x 1.96
num::int_log::u16_log10_random_small 1,035 405 -630 -60.87% x 2.56
num::int_log::u32_log10_predictable 1,144 894 -250 -21.85% x 1.28
num::int_log::u32_log10_random 832 786 -46 -5.53% x 1.06
num::int_log::u32_log10_random_small 832 787 -45 -5.41% x 1.06
num::int_log::u64_log10_predictable 2,681 2,057 -624 -23.27% x 1.30
num::int_log::u64_log10_random 1,015 806 -209 -20.59% x 1.26
num::int_log::u64_log10_random_small 1,004 795 -209 -20.82% x 1.26
num::int_log::u128_log10_predictable 56,825 56,526 -299 -0.53% x 1.01
num::int_log::u128_log10_random 9,056 8,861 -195 -2.15% x 1.02
num::int_log::u128_log10_random_small 1,528 1,527 -1 -0.07% x 1.00
```
The 128 bit case remains ridiculously slow because llvm fails to optimize division by a constant 128-bit value to multiplications. This could be worked around but it seems preferable to fix this in llvm.
From u32 up, table lookup (like suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70887#issuecomment-881099813)) is still faster, but requires a hardware `leading_zeros` to be viable, and might clog up the cache.
Fix ICE when compiling nightly std/rustc on beta compiler
Fix#89775#89479 renames a lot of diagnostic items, but it happens that the beta compiler assumes that there must be DefId with `rustc_diagnostic_item = "send_trait"`, causing an ICE when compiling stage 0 std or stage 1 compiler. So gate it with `cfg(bootstrap)`.
The unwrap is also removed, so that existence of the diagnostic item is not required. I ripgreped the code base and this seems the only place where `unwrap` is called on the return value of `get_diagnostic_item`.
Add `Poll::ready` and revert stabilization of `task::ready!`
This PR adds an inherent `ready` method to `Poll` that can be used with the `?` operator as an alternative to the `task::ready!` macro:
```rust
let val = ready!(fut.poll(cx));
let val = fut.poll(cx).ready()?;
```
I think this form is a nice, non-breaking middle ground between changing the `impl Try for Poll`, and adding a separate macro. It looks better than `ready!` in my opinion, and it composes well:
```rust
let elem = ready!(fut.poll(cx)).pop().unwrap();
let elem = fut.poll(cx).ready()?.pop().unwrap();
```
The planned stabilization of `ready!` in 1.56 has been reverted because I think this alternate approach is worth considering.
r? rust-lang/libs
Add enum_intrinsics_non_enums lint
There is a clippy lint to prevent calling [`mem::discriminant`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.discriminant.html) with a non-enum type. I think the lint is worthy of being included in rustc, given that `discriminant::<T>()` where `T` is a non-enum has an unspecified return value, and there are no valid use cases where you'd actually want this.
I've also made the lint check [variant_count](https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/mem/fn.variant_count.html) (#73662).
closes#83899
Add #[must_use] to from_value conversions
I added two methods to the list myself. Clippy did not flag them because they take `mut` args, but neither modifies their argument.
```rust
core::str const unsafe fn from_utf8_unchecked_mut(v: &mut [u8]) -> &mut str;
std::ffi::CString unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString;
```
I put a custom note on `from_raw`:
```rust
#[must_use = "call `drop(from_raw(ptr))` if you intend to drop the `CString`"]
pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString {
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ``@joshtriplett``
Add #[must_use] to alloc constructors
Added `#[must_use]`. to the various forms of `new`, `pin`, and `with_capacity` in the `alloc` crate. No extra explanations given as I couldn't think of anything useful to add.
I figure this deserves extra scrutiny compared to the other PRs I've done so far. In particular:
* The 4 `pin`/`pin_in` methods I touched. Are there legitimate use cases for pinning and not using the result? Pinning's a difficult concept I'm not very comfortable with.
* `Box`'s constructors. Do people ever create boxes just for the side effects... allocating or zeroing out memory?
Parent issue: #89692
r? ``@joshtriplett``
