Factor out several utils, add `path_def_id`
changelog: none
This is generally an effort to reduce the total number of utils. `path_def_id` is added which I believe is more "cross-cutting" and also complements `path_to_local`. Best reviewed one commit at a time.
Added:
* `path_def_id`
* `path_res`
Removed:
* `is_qpath_def_path`
* `match_any_diagnostic_items`
* `expr_path_res`
* `single_segment_path`
* `differing_macro_contexts`
* `is_ty_param_lang_item`
* `is_ty_param_diagnostic_item`
* `get_qpath_generics`
Renamed:
* `path_to_res` to `def_path_res`
* `get_qpath_generic_tys` to `qpath_generic_tys`
CC `@Jarcho` since this relates to some of your work and you may have input.
warn if we find multiple clippy configs
Fixes#8323
---
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: warn if we find multiple clippy configs
Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Partially implements #3999 and #546
This doesn't consider `enum`s at all right now as those are going to be a pain to deal with. This also allows `#[repr(Rust)]` structs with only one non-zero sized fields. I think those are technically undefined when transmuted.
changelog: Add lint `transmute_undefined_repr`
Add `explicit_write` suggestions for `write!`s with format args
changelog: Add [`explicit_write`] suggestions for `write!`s with format args
Fixes#4542
```rust
writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
```
Now suggests:
```
error: use of `writeln!(stderr(), ...).unwrap()`
--> $DIR/explicit_write.rs:36:9
|
LL | writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `eprintln!("macro arg {}", one!())`
```
---------
r? `@camsteffen` (again, sorry 😛) for the `FormatArgsExpn` change
Before this change `inputs_span` returned a span pointing to just `1` in
```rust
macro_rules! one {
() => { 1 };
}
`writeln!(std::io::stderr(), "macro arg {}", one!()).unwrap();`
```
And the `source_callsite` of that span didn't include the format string, it was just `one!()`
make unwrap_used also trigger on .get().unwrap()
fixes#8124
changelog: make the [unwrap_used] lint trigger for code of the form such as `.get(i).unwrap()` and `.get_mut(i).unwrap()`
[explicit_counter_loop] suggests `.into_iter()`, despite that triggering [into_iter_on_ref] in some cases
I have modified `fn make_iterator_snippet` in clippy_lints/src/loops/utils.rs ,so this change has some little influence on another lint [manual_flatten] .
fixes#8155
---
changelog: Fix that [`explicit_counter_loop`] suggests `into_iter()` despite that triggering [`into_iter_on_ref`] in some cases
single_match: Don't lint non-exhaustive matches; support tuples
`single_match` lint:
* Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
Rationale: The definition of the enum could be changed, so the user can get non-exhaustive match after applying the suggested lint (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1013566068 for context).
* Lint `match` constructions with tuples (as suggested at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1015621148)
Closes#8282
---
changelog: [`single_match`]: Don't lint exhaustive enum patterns without a wild.
changelog: [`single_match`]: Lint `match` constructions with tuples
Fix underflow in `manual_split_once` lint
Hi, a friend found clippy started crashing on a suspiciously large allocation of `u64::MAX` memory on their code.
The mostly minimized repro is:
```rust
fn _f01(title: &str) -> Option<()> {
let _ = title[1..].splitn(2, '[').next()?;
Some(())
}
```
The underflow happens in this case on line 57 of the patch but I've changed the other substraction to saturating as well since it could potentially cause the same issue.
I'm not sure where to put a regression test, or if it's even worth for such a thing.
Aside, has it been considered before to build clippy with overflow checks enabled?
changelog: fix ICE of underflow in `manual_split_once` lint
Store a `Symbol` instead of an `Ident` in `AssocItem`
This is the same idea as #92533, but for `AssocItem` instead
of `VariantDef`/`FieldDef`.
With this change, we no longer have any uses of
`#[stable_hasher(project(...))]`
