Clarify `Unsize` documentation
The documentation erroneously says that:
```rust
/// - Types implementing a trait `Trait` also implement `Unsize<dyn Trait>`.
/// - Structs `Foo<..., T, ...>` implement `Unsize<Foo<..., U, ...>>` if all of these conditions
/// are met:
/// - `T: Unsize<U>`.
/// - Only the last field of `Foo` has a type involving `T`.
/// - `Bar<T>: Unsize<Bar<U>>`, where `Bar<T>` stands for the actual type of that last field.
```
Specifically, `T: Unsize<U>` is not required to hold -- only the final field must implement `FinalField<T>: Unsize<FinalField<U>>`. This can be demonstrated by the test I added.
---
Second commit fleshes out the documentation a lot more.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Clean up unchecked_math, separate out unchecked_shifts
Tracking issue: #85122
Changes:
1. Remove `const_inherent_unchecked_arith` flag and make const-stability flags the same as the method feature flags. Given the number of other unsafe const fns already stabilised, it makes sense to just stabilise these in const context when they're stabilised.
2. Move `unchecked_shl` and `unchecked_shr` into a separate `unchecked_shifts` flag, since the semantics for them are unclear and they'll likely be stabilised separately as a result.
3. Add an `unchecked_neg` method exclusively to signed integers, under the `unchecked_neg` flag. This is because it's a new API and probably needs some time to marinate before it's stabilised, and while it *would* make sense to have a similar version for unsigned integers since `checked_neg` also exists for those there is absolutely no case where that would be a good idea, IMQHO.
The longer-term goal here is to prepare the `unchecked_math` methods for an FCP and stabilisation since they've existed for a while, their semantics are clear, and people seem in favour of stabilising them.
Allows `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attributes to have multiple
notes
This commit extends the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` (and `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`) attributes to allow multiple `note` options. This enables emitting multiple notes for custom error messages. For now I've opted to not change any of the existing usages of `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` and just updated the relevant compile tests.
r? `@compiler-errors`
I'm happy to adjust any of the existing changed location to emit the old error message if that's desired.
Increase the reach of panic_immediate_abort
I wanted to use/abuse this recently as part of another project, and I was surprised how many panic-related things were left in my binaries if I built a large crate with the feature enabled along with LTO. These changes get all the panic-related symbols that I could find out of my set of locally installed Rust utilities.
memcpy assumptions: link to source showing that GCC makes the same assumption
I finally stumbled upon a source showing that GCC also generates overlapping `memcpy`. So if we're linking major C compilers making such assumptions here, let's have both clang and GCC.
notes
This commit extends the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` (and
`#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`) attributes to allow multiple `note`
options. This enables emitting multiple notes for custom error messages.
For now I've opted to not change any of the existing usages of
`#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` and just updated the relevant compile tests.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114998 (feat(docs): add cargo-pgo to PGO documentation 📝)
- #116868 (Tweak suggestion span for outer attr and point at item following invalid inner attr)
- #117240 (Fix documentation typo in std::iter::Iterator::collect_into)
- #117241 (Stash and cancel cycle errors for auto trait leakage in opaques)
- #117262 (Create a new ConstantKind variant (ZeroSized) for StableMIR)
- #117266 (replace transmute by raw pointer cast)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Refactor some `char`, `u8` ASCII functions to be branchless
Extract conditions in singular `matches!` with or-patterns to individual `matches!` statements which enables branchless code output. The following functions were changed:
- `is_ascii_alphanumeric`
- `is_ascii_hexdigit`
- `is_ascii_punctuation`
Added codegen tests
---
Continued from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103024.
Based on the comment from `@scottmcm` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103024#pullrequestreview-1248697206.
The unmodified `is_ascii_*` functions didn't seem to benefit from extracting the conditions.
I've never written a codegen test before, but I tried to check that no branches were emitted.
Decompose singular `matches!` with or-patterns to individual `matches!`
statements to enable branchless code output. The following functions
were changed:
- `is_ascii_alphanumeric`
- `is_ascii_hexdigit`
- `is_ascii_punctuation`
Add codegen tests
Co-authored-by: George Bateman <george.bateman16@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: scottmcm <scottmcm@users.noreply.github.com>
Explain implementation of mem::replace
This adds a comment to explain why `mem::replace` is not implemented in terms of `mem::swap` to prevent [naïfs like me](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117189) from trying to "fix" it.
Rework negative coherence to properly consider impls that only partly overlap
This PR implements a modified negative coherence that handles impls that only have partial overlap.
It does this by:
1. taking both impl trait refs, instantiating them with infer vars
2. equating both trait refs
3. taking the equated trait ref (which represents the two impls' intersection), and resolving any vars
4. plugging all remaining infer vars with placeholder types
these placeholder-plugged trait refs can then be used normally with the new trait solver, since we no longer have to worry about the issue with infer vars in param-envs.
We use the **new trait solver** to reason correctly about unnormalized trait refs (due to deferred projection equality), since this avoid having to normalize anything under param-envs with infer vars in them.
This PR then additionally:
* removes the `FnPtr` knowable hack by implementing proper negative `FnPtr` trait bounds for rigid types.
---
An example:
Consider these two partially overlapping impls:
```
impl<T, U> PartialEq<&U> for &T where T: PartialEq<U> {}
impl<F> PartialEq<F> for F where F: FnPtr {}
```
Under the old algorithm, we would take one of these impls and replace it with infer vars, then try unifying it with the other impl under identity substitutions. This is not possible in either direction, since it either sets `T = U`, or tries to equate `F = &?0`.
Under the new algorithm, we try to unify `?0: PartialEq<?0>` with `&?1: PartialEq<&?2>`. This gives us `?0 = &?1 = &?2` and thus `?1 = ?2`. The intersection of these two trait refs therefore looks like: `&?1: PartialEq<&?1>`. After plugging this with placeholders, we get a trait ref that looks like `&!0: PartialEq<&!0>`, with the first impl having substs `?T = ?U = !0` and the second having substs `?F = &!0`[^1].
Then we can take the param-env from the first impl, and try to prove the negated where clause of the second.
We know that `&!0: !FnPtr` never holds, since it's a rigid type that is also not a fn ptr, we successfully detect that these impls may never overlap.
[^1]: For the purposes of this example, I just ignored lifetimes, since it doesn't really matter.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #117111 (Remove support for alias `-Z instrument-coverage`)
- #117141 (Require target features to match exactly during inlining)
- #117152 (Fix unwrap suggestion for async fn)
- #117154 (implement C ABI lowering for CSKY)
- #117159 (Work around the fact that `check_mod_type_wf` may spuriously return `ErrorGuaranteed`)
- #117163 (compiletest: Display compilation errors in mir-opt tests)
- #117173 (Make `Iterator` a lang item)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Derive `Ord`, `PartialOrd` and `Hash` for `SocketAddr*`
Fixes#116711
The main pain of this PR is to fix the buggy impl of `Ord` for `SocketAddrV6`, which ignored half of the fields (while `PartialEq` is derived):
4603f0b8af/library/core/src/net/socket_addr.rs (L99-L106)4603f0b8af/library/core/src/net/socket_addr.rs (L676)
For me it looks like a simple copy-paste error made in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72239 (copy from v4 impl) (cc `@hch12907),` as I don't see this behavior being mentioned anywhere on the PR and it also does not respect `cmp` trait "rules". I also do not see any reasons for those impls to _not_ be derived.
It's a shame we did not notice this for 28 versions/3 years. I guess this is a bug fix, but I'm not sure what the process here should be.
r? libs
Validate `feature` and `since` values inside `#[stable(…)]`
Previously the string passed to `#[unstable(feature = "...")]` would be validated as an identifier, but not `#[stable(feature = "...")]`. In the standard library there were `stable` attributes containing the empty string, and kebab-case string, neither of which should be allowed.
Pre-existing validation of `unstable`:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
#[unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```console
error[E0546]: 'feature' is not an identifier
--> src/lib.rs:5:1
|
5 | #![unstable(feature = "kebab-case", issue = "none")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
For an `unstable` attribute, the need for an identifier is obvious because the downstream code needs to write a `#![feature(...)]` attribute containing that identifier. `#![feature(kebab-case)]` is not valid syntax and `#![feature(kebab_case)]` would not work if that is not the name of the feature.
Having a valid identifier even in `stable` is less essential but still useful because it allows for informative diagnostic about the stabilization of a feature. Compare:
```rust
// src/lib.rs
#![allow(internal_features)]
#![feature(staged_api)]
#![stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
#[stable(feature = "kebab-case", since = "1.0.0")]
pub struct Struct;
```
```rust
// src/main.rs
#![feature(kebab_case)]
use repro::Struct;
fn main() {}
```
```console
error[E0635]: unknown feature `kebab_case`
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(kebab_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
vs the situation if we correctly use `feature = "snake_case"` and `#![feature(snake_case)]`, as enforced by this PR:
```console
warning: the feature `snake_case` has been stable since 1.0.0 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
--> src/main.rs:3:12
|
3 | #![feature(snake_case)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(stable_features)]` on by default
```
