fix(generic_const_exprs): Fix predicate inheritance for children of opaque types
Fixes#99705
We currently have a special case to perform predicate inheritance when the const item is in the generics. I think we're also going to need this for opaque return types. When evaluating the predicates applied to the associated item, it'll inherit from its parent, the opaque type, which will never have predicates applied. This PR bypass the opaque typed parent and inherit predicates directly from the function itself.
Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
Track where diagnostics were created.
This implements the `-Ztrack-diagnostics` flag, which uses `#[track_caller]` to track where diagnostics are created. It is meant as a debugging tool much like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`.
For example, the following code...
```rust
struct A;
struct B;
fn main(){
let _: A = B;
}
```
...now emits the following error message:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src\main.rs:5:16
|
5 | let _: A = B;
| - ^ expected struct `A`, found struct `B`
| |
| expected due to this
-Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler\rustc_infer\src\infer\error_reporting\mod.rs:2275:31
```
(almost) Always use `ObligationCtxt` when dealing with canonical queries
Hope this is a step in the right direction. cc rust-lang/types-team#50.
r? `@lcnr`
Enable varargs support for calling conventions other than C or cdecl
This patch makes it possible to use varargs for calling conventions,
which are either based on C (efiapi) or C is based on them (sysv64 and win64).
Also pinging ``@phlopsi,`` because he noticed first this oversight when writing a library for UEFI.
Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions
Functions in answer:
- `Ty::is_freeze`
- `Ty::is_sized`
- `Ty::is_unpin`
- `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
This allows to remove a lot of useless `.at(DUMMY_SP)`, making the code a bit nicer :3
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rename some `OwnerId` fields.
`@spastorino` noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of `def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left that alone.
r? `@compiler-errors`
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
Note scope of TAIT more accurately
This maybe explains why the person was confused in #101897, since we say "same module" but really should've said "same impl".
r? ``@oli-obk``
Introduce UnordMap, UnordSet, and UnordBag (MCP 533)
This is the start of implementing [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
I followed `@eddyb's` suggestion of naming the collection types `Unord(Map/Set/Bag)` which is a bit easier to type than `Unordered(Map/Set/Bag)`
r? `@eddyb`
Emit a nicer error on `impl Self {`
currently it emits a "cycle detected error" but this PR makes it emit a more user friendly error specifically saying that `Self` is disallowed in that position. this is a pretty hacky fix so i dont expect this to be merged (I basically only made this PR because i wanted to see if CI passes)
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Remap early bound lifetimes in return-position `impl Trait` in traits too
Fixes part of #103457
r? ``@cjgillot,`` though feel free to reassign, just thought you'd have sufficient context to review.
Add suggestions for unsafe impl error codes
Adds suggestions for users to add `unsafe` to trait impls that should be `unsafe`, and remove `unsafe` from trait impls that do not require `unsafe`
With the folllowing code:
```rust
struct Foo {}
struct Bar {}
trait Safe {}
unsafe trait Unsafe {}
impl Safe for Foo {} // ok
impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
unsafe impl Unsafe for Bar {} // ok
// omitted empty main fn
```
The current rustc output is:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
With this PR, the future rustc output would be:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: remove `unsafe` from this trait implementation
|
13 - unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
13 + impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
|
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the trait `Unsafe` enforces invariants that the compiler can't check. Review the trait documentation and make sure this implementation upholds those invariants before adding the `unsafe` keyword
help: add `unsafe` to this trait implementation
|
11 | unsafe impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ++++++
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
``@rustbot`` label +T-compiler +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics
