Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ralf Jung
a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
Urgau
a3ffa1eae5 Improve non-boolean literal error in cfg predicate 2024-10-04 09:09:20 +02:00
Pavel Grigorenko
c36b21a4c8 rustc_attr: make "compact cfg(target(..)) is unstable" translatable 2024-08-10 14:32:55 +03:00
yukang
53dba7fb55 fix spans of arguments in diagnostic 2024-03-03 10:48:40 +08:00
yukang
5a5c6dfb33 Fix misleading message when using a named constant as a struct alignment/pack 2024-03-02 23:15:39 +08:00
David Tolnay
82ed3f5e8b
Validate since value in stable attribute 2023-10-23 13:04:35 -07:00
clubby789
f97fddab91 Ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order 2023-05-25 23:49:35 +00:00
est31
7e2ecb3cd8 Simplify message paths
This makes it easier to open the messages file while developing on features.

The commit was the result of automatted changes:

for p in compiler/rustc_*; do mv $p/locales/en-US.ftl $p/messages.ftl; rmdir $p/locales; done

for p in compiler/rustc_*; do sed -i "s#\.\./locales/en-US.ftl#../messages.ftl#" $p/src/lib.rs; done
2023-03-11 22:51:57 +01:00