miri: fail when calling a function that requires an unavailable target feature
miri will report an UB when calling a function that has a `#[target_feature(enable = ...)]` attribute is called and the required feature is not available.
"Available features" are the same that `is_x86_feature_detected!` (or equivalent) reports to be available during miri execution (which can be enabled or disabled with the `-C target-feature` flag).
Generate safe stable code for derives on empty enums
Generate `match *self {}` instead of `unsafe { core::intrinsics::unreachable() }`.
This is:
1. safe
2. stable
for the benefit of everyone looking at these derived impls through `cargo expand`.
[Both expansions compile to the same code at all optimization levels (including `0`).](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/P79joGMh3)
Add support for inherent projections in new solver
Not hard to support these, and it cuts out a really big chunk of failing UI tests with `--compare-mode=next-solver`
r? `@lcnr` (feel free to reassign, anyone can review this)
Generate `match *self {}` instead of `unsafe { core::intrinsics::unreachable() }`.
This is:
1. safe
2. stable
for the benefit of everyone looking at these derived impls through `cargo expand`.
Both expansions compile to the same code at all optimization levels (including `0`).
Don't call `predicate_must_hold`-esque functions during fulfillment in intercrate
Fixes#113415
Given that this only happens in `translate_substs`, I don't actually think that this is something that you can weaponize, but it's still sketchy regardless.
r? `@lcnr`
Check entry type as part of item type checking.
This code is currently executed inside the root `analysis` query.
Instead, check it during `check_for_entry_fn(CRATE_DEF_ID)` to hopefully avoid some re-executions.
`CRATE_DEF_ID` is chosen by considering that entry fn are typically at crate root, so the corresponding HIR should already be in the dependencies.
Add `#[rustc_confusables]` attribute to allow targeted "no method" error suggestions on standard library types
After this PR, the standard library developer can annotate methods on e.g. `BTreeSet::push` with `#[rustc_confusables("insert")]`. When the user mistypes `btreeset.push()`, `BTreeSet::insert` will be suggested if there are no other candidates to suggest. This PR lays the foundations for contributors to add `rustc_confusables` annotations to standard library types for targeted suggestions, as specified in #59450, or to address cases such as #108437.
### Example
Assume `BTreeSet` is the standard library type:
```
// Standard library definition
#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
struct BTreeSet;
impl BTreeSet {
#[rustc_confusables("push")]
fn insert(&self) {}
}
// User code
fn main() {
let x = BTreeSet {};
x.push();
}
```
A new suggestion (which has lower precedence than suggestions for misspellings and only is shown when there are no misspellings suggestions) will be added to hint the user maybe they intended to write `x.insert()` instead:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `push` found for struct `BTreeSet` in the current scope
--> test.rs:12:7
|
3 | struct BTreeSet;
| --------------- method `push` not found for this struct
...
12 | x.push();
| ^^^^ method not found in `BTreeSet`
|
help: you might have meant to use `insert`
|
12 | x.insert();
| ~~~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Hide `compiler_builtins` in the prelude
This crate is a private implementation detail. We only need to insert it into the crate graph for linking and should not expose any of its public API.
Fixes#113533
"no method" errors on standard library types
The standard library developer can annotate methods on e.g.
`BTreeSet::push` with `#[rustc_confusables("insert")]`. When the user
mistypes `btreeset.push()`, `BTreeSet::insert` will be suggested if
there are no other candidates to suggest.
Implement "items do not inherit unsafety" note for THIR unsafeck
Implements the "items do not inherit unsafety from separate enclosing items" note from the MIR unsafety checker in the THIR unsafety checker (`-Z thir-unsafeck`) to maintain parity between the two unsafety checkers. The logic to find the separate enclosing item is nearly the same as in the MIR unsafety checker.
Structurally normalize in selection
We need to do this because of the fact that we're checking the `Ty::kind` on a type during selection, but goals passed into select are not necessarily normalized.
Right now, we're (kinda) unnecessarily normalizing the RHS of a trait upcasting goal, which is broken for different reasons (#113393). But I'm waiting for this PR to land before discussing that one.
r? `@lcnr`
Resurrect: rustc_target: Add alignment to indirectly-passed by-value types, correcting the alignment of byval on x86 in the process.
Same as #111551, which I [accidentally closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111551#issuecomment-1571222612) :/
---
This resurrects PR #103830, which has sat idle for a while.
Beyond #103830, this also:
- fixes byval alignment for types containing vectors on Darwin (see `tests/codegen/align-byval-vector.rs`)
- fixes byval alignment for overaligned types on x86 Windows (see `tests/codegen/align-byval.rs`)
- fixes ABI for types with 128bit requested alignment on ARM64 Linux (see `tests/codegen/aarch64-struct-align-128.rs`)
r? `@nikic`
---
`@pcwalton's` original PR description is reproduced below:
Commit 88e4d2c from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.
The problem is summarized in [this comment] by `@eddyb.` Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.
As a side effect, this should fix#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.
[this comment]: #80822 (comment)
Allow escaping bound vars during `normalize_erasing_regions` in new solver
Add `AllowEscapingBoundVars` to `deeply_normalize`, and use it in the new solver in the `query_normalize` routine.
Ideally, we'd make all `query_normalize` calls handle pass in `AllowEscapingBoundVars` individually, because really the only `query_normalize` call that needs `AllowEscapingBoundVars::Yes` is the one in `try_normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions`, but I think that's kind of overkill. I am happy to be convinced otherwise, though.
r? `@lcnr`
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
This crate is a private implementation detail. We only need to insert it
into the crate graph for linking and should not expose any of its public
API.
Fixes#113533
Eliminate ZST allocations in `Box` and `Vec`
This PR fixes 2 issues with `Box` and `RawVec` related to ZST allocations. Specifically, the `Allocator` trait requires that:
- If you allocate a zero-sized layout then you must later deallocate it, otherwise the allocator may leak memory.
- You cannot pass a ZST pointer to the allocator that you haven't previously allocated.
These restrictions exist because an allocator implementation is allowed to allocate non-zero amounts of memory for a zero-sized allocation. For example, `malloc` in libc does this.
Currently, ZSTs are handled differently in `Box` and `Vec`:
- `Vec` never allocates when `T` is a ZST or if the vector capacity is 0.
- `Box` just blindly passes everything on to the allocator, including ZSTs.
This causes problems due to the free conversions between `Box<[T]>` and `Vec<T>`, specifically that ZST allocations could get leaked or a dangling pointer could be passed to `deallocate`.
This PR fixes this by changing `Box` to not allocate for zero-sized values and slices. It also fixes a bug in `RawVec::shrink` where shrinking to a size of zero did not actually free the backing memory.
Implement selection for `Unsize` for better coercion behavior
In order for much of coercion to succeed, we need to be able to deal with partial ambiguity of `Unsize` traits during selection. However, I pessimistically implemented selection in the new trait solver to just bail out with ambiguity if it was a built-in impl:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs (L126)
This implements a proper "rematch" procedure for dealing with built-in `Unsize` goals, so that even if the goal is ambiguous, we are able to get nested obligations which are used in the coercion selection-like loop:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/coercion.rs (L702)
Second commit just moves a `resolve_vars_if_possible` call to fix a bug where we weren't detecting a trait upcasting to occur.
r? ``@lcnr``
(re-)tighten sourceinfo span of adjustments in MIR
Diagnostics rely on the spans of MIR statements being (approximately) correct in order to give suggestions relative to that span (i.e. `shrink_to_hi` and `shrink_to_lo`).
I discovered that we're *intentionally* lowering THIR exprs with their parent expr's span if they come from adjustments that are due to a parent expression. While I understand why that may be desirable to demonstrate the relationship of an adjustment and the expression that requires it, it leads to
1. very verbose borrowck output
2. incorrect spans for suggestions
Some diagnostics get around that by giving suggestions relative to other spans we've collected during MIR lowering, such as the span of the method's identifier (e.g. `name` in `.name()`), but this doesn't work too well when things come from desugaring.
I assume it also has lead to numerous tweaks and complications to diagnostics code down the road, which this PR doesn't necessarily aim to fix but may open the gates to fixing later... The last three commits are simplifications due to the fact that we can assume that the move span actually points to what is being moved (and a test).
This regressed in #89110, which was debated somewhat in #90286. cc `@Aaron1011` who originally made this change.
r? diagnostics
Fixes#113547Fixes#111016
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112717 (Implement a few more rvalue translation to smir)
- #113310 (Don't suggest `impl Trait` in path position)
- #113497 (Support explicit 32-bit MIPS ABI for the synthetic object)
- #113560 (Lint against misplaced where-clauses on associated types in traits)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Lint against misplaced where-clauses on associated types in traits
Extends the scope of the lint `deprecated_where_clause_location` (#89122) from associated types in impls to associated types in any location (impl or trait). This is only relevant for `#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]`. Previously we didn't warn on the following code for example:
```rs
#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]
trait Trait { type Assoc where u32: Copy = (); }
```
Personally I would've preferred to emit a *hard* error here instead of a lint warning since the feature is unstable but unfortunately we are constrained by back compat as associated type defaults won't necessarily trigger the feature-gate error if they are inside of a macro call (since they use a post-expansion feature-gate due to historical reasons, see also #66004).
I've renamed and moved related preexisting tests: 1. They test AST validation passes not the parser & thus shouldn't live in `parser/` (historical reasons?). 2. One test file was named after type aliases even though it tests assoc tys.
`@rustbot` label A-lint
Structurally resolve in pattern matching when peeling refs in new solver
Let me know if you want me to commit the minimized test:
```rust
fn test() {}
fn test2() {}
fn main() {
let tests: &[(_, fn())] = &[
("test", test),
("test2", test2),
];
for (a, b) in tests {
todo!();
}
}
```
In that test above, the match scrutinee is `<std::vec::Iter<(&'static str, fn())> as Iterator>::Item`, which we cannot peel the refs from.
We also need to structurally resolve in the loop, since structural resolve is inherently shallow. I haven't come up with a test where this matters, but I can if you care.
Also, I removed two other calls to `resolve_vars_with_obligations` in diagnostics code that I'm pretty convinced are not useful.
r? `@lcnr`
