Implement intrinsics with fallback bodies
fixes#93145 (though we can port many more intrinsics)
cc #63585
The way this works is that the backend logic for generating custom code for intrinsics has been made fallible. The only failure path is "this intrinsic is unknown". The `Instance` (that was `InstanceDef::Intrinsic`) then gets converted to `InstanceDef::Item`, which represents the fallback body. A regular function call to that body is then codegenned. This is currently implemented for
* codegen_ssa (so llvm and gcc)
* codegen_cranelift
other backends will need to adjust, but they can just keep doing what they were doing if they prefer (though adding new intrinsics to the compiler will then require them to implement them, instead of getting the fallback body).
cc `@scottmcm` `@WaffleLapkin`
### todo
* [ ] miri support
* [x] default intrinsic name to name of function instead of requiring it to be specified in attribute
* [x] make sure that the bodies are always available (must be collected for metadata)
Only point out non-diverging arms for match suggestions
Fixes#121144
There is no reason to point at diverging arms, which will always coerce to whatever is the match block's evaluated type.
This also removes the suggestion from #106601, since as I pointed out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72634#issuecomment-1946210898 the added suggestion is not firing in the right cases, but instead only when one of the match arms already *actually* evaluates to `()`.
r? estebank
Store static initializers in metadata instead of the MIR of statics.
This means that adding generic statics would be even more difficult, as we can't evaluate statics from other crates anymore, but the subtle issue I have encountered make me think that having this be an explicit problem is better.
The issue is that
```rust
static mut FOO: &mut u32 = &mut 42;
static mut BAR = unsafe { FOO };
```
gets different allocations, instead of referring to the same one. This is also true for non-static mut, but promotion makes `static FOO: &u32 = &42;` annoying to demo.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61345
## Why is this being done?
In order to ensure all crates see the same nested allocations (which is the last issue that needs fixing before we can stabilize [`const_mut_refs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349)), I am working on creating anonymous (from the Rust side, to LLVM it's like a regular static item) static items for the nested allocations in a static. If we evaluate the static item in a downstream crate again, we will end up duplicating its nested allocations (and in some cases, like the `match` case, even duplicate the main allocation).
Enforce coroutine-closure layouts are identical
Enforce that for an async closure, the by-ref and by-move coroutine layouts are identical. This is just a sanity check to make sure that optimizations aren't doing anything fishy.
r? oli-obk
Make sure `tcx.create_def` also depends on the forever red node, instead of just `tcx.at(span).create_def`
oversight from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119136
Not actually an issue, because all uses of `tcx.create_def` were in the resolver, which is `eval_always`, but still good to harden against future uses of `create_def`
cc `@petrochenkov` `@WaffleLapkin`
Make sure `tcx.create_def` also depends on the forever red node, instead of just `tcx.at(span).create_def`
oversight from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119136
Not actually an issue, because all uses of `tcx.create_def` were in the resolver, which is `eval_always`, but still good to harden against future uses of `create_def`
cc `@petrochenkov` `@WaffleLapkin`
Extend documentation for `Ty::to_opt_closure_kind` method
This API was... surprising to use. With a little extra documentation, the weirdness can be reduced quite a lot. :)
r? `@compiler-errors`
Uplift `TypeVisitableExt` into `rustc_type_ir`
This uplifts `TypeVisitableExt` into `rustc_type_ir` so it can be used in an interner-agnostic way. It also moves some `TypeSuperVisitable` bounds onto `Interner` since we don't expect to support libraries that have types which aren't foldable by default.
This restores a couple of asserts in the canonicalizer code we uplifted, and also makes it so that we can use type-flags-based helpers in the solver code, which I'm interested in uplifting.
r? lcnr
Fully stop using the HIR in trait impl checks
At least I hope I found all happy path usages. I'll need to check if I can figure out a way to make queries declare that they don't access the HIR except in error paths
Properly handle `async` block and `async fn` in `if` exprs without `else`
When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the `async fn`.
We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.
Fix#115405.
Merge `impl_polarity` and `impl_trait_ref` queries
Hopefully this is perf neutral. I want to finish https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120835 and stop using the HIR in `coherent_trait`, which should then give us a perf improvement.
It's only has a single remaining purpose: to ensure that a diagnostic is
printed when `trimmed_def_paths` is used. It's an annoying mechanism:
weak, with odd semantics, badly named, and gets in the way of other
changes.
This commit replaces it with a simpler `must_produce_diag` mechanism,
getting rid of a diagnostic `Level` along the way.
Dejargonize `subst`
In favor of #110793, replace almost every occurence of `subst` and `substitution` from rustc codes, but they still remains in subtrees under `src/tools/` like clippy and test codes (I'd like to replace them after this)
Fix async closures in CTFE
First commit renames `is_coroutine_or_closure` into `is_closure_like`, because `is_coroutine_or_closure_or_coroutine_closure` seems confusing and long.
Second commit fixes some forgotten cases where we want to handle `TyKind::CoroutineClosure` the same as closures and coroutines.
The test exercises the change to `ValidityVisitor::aggregate_field_path_elem` which is the source of #120946, but not the change to `UsedParamsNeedSubstVisitor`, though I feel like it's not that big of a deal. Let me know if you'd like for me to look into constructing a test for the latter, though I have no idea what it'd look like (we can't assert against `TooGeneric` anywhere?).
Fixes#120946
r? oli-obk cc ``@RalfJung``
When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression
without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to
suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the
`async fn`.
We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.
Fix#115405.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120765 (Reorder diagnostics API)
- #120833 (More internal emit diagnostics cleanups)
- #120899 (Gracefully handle non-WF alias in `assemble_alias_bound_candidates_recur`)
- #120917 (Remove a bunch of dead parameters in functions)
- #120928 (Add test for recently fixed issue)
- #120933 (check_consts: fix duplicate errors, make importance consistent)
- #120936 (improve `btree_cursors` functions documentation)
- #120944 (Check that the ABI of the instance we are inlining is correct)
- #120956 (Clean inlined type alias with correct param-env)
- #120962 (Add myself to library/std review)
- #120972 (fix ICE for deref coercions with type errors)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name*
Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into *different* placeholders if those params differ by name.
Print kind of coroutine closure
Make sure that we print "async closure" when we have an async closure, rather than calling it generically a ["coroutine-closure"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120361).
Fixes#120886
r? oli-obk
Remove the FIXME and keep `CRATE_HIR_ID` being its own parent.
This scheme turned out to be more practical than having an `Option` on closer inspection.
Also make `hir_owner_parent` more readable.
improve normalization of `Pointee::Metadata`
This PR makes it so that `<Wrapper<Tail> as Pointee>::Metadata` is normalized to `<Tail as Pointee>::Metadata` if we don't know `Wrapper<Tail>: Sized`. With that, the trait solver can prove projection predicates like `<Wrapper<Tail> as Pointee>::Metadata == <Tail as Pointee>::Metadata`, which makes it possible to use the metadata APIs to cast between the tail and the wrapper:
```rust
#![feature(ptr_metadata)]
use std::ptr::{self, Pointee};
fn cast_same_meta<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const U
where
T: Pointee<Metadata = <U as Pointee>::Metadata>,
{
let (thin, meta) = ptr.to_raw_parts();
ptr::from_raw_parts(thin, meta)
}
struct Wrapper<T: ?Sized>(T);
fn cast_to_wrapper<T: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const Wrapper<T> {
cast_same_meta(ptr)
}
```
Previously, this failed to compile:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<Wrapper<T> as Pointee>::Metadata == <T as Pointee>::Metadata`
--> src/lib.rs:16:5
|
15 | fn cast_to_wrapper<T: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> *const Wrapper<T> {
| - found this type parameter
16 | cast_same_meta(ptr)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Wrapper<T>`, found type parameter `T`
|
= note: expected associated type `<Wrapper<T> as Pointee>::Metadata`
found associated type `<T as Pointee>::Metadata`
= note: an associated type was expected, but a different one was found
```
(Yes, you can already do this with `as` casts. But using functions is so much ✨ *safer* ✨, because you can't change the metadata on accident.)
---
This PR essentially changes the built-in impls of `Pointee` from this:
```rust
// before
impl Pointee for u8 {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for [u8] {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
impl Pointee for Wrapper<u8> {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for Wrapper<[u8]> {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T: ?Sized> Pointee for Wrapper<T>
where
Wrapper<T>: Sized
{
type Metadata = ();
}
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T /*: Sized */> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = ();
}
```
to this:
```rust
// after
impl Pointee for u8 {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for [u8] {
type Metadata = usize;
}
// ...
impl<T: ?Sized> Pointee for Wrapper<T> {
// in the old solver this will instead project to the "deep" tail directly,
// e.g. `Wrapper<Wrapper<T>>::Metadata = T::Metadata`
type Metadata = <T as Pointee>::Metadata;
}
// ...
// This impl is only selected if `T` is a type parameter or unnormalizable projection or opaque type.
fallback impl<T /*: Sized */> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = ();
}
```
Invert diagnostic lints.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than half of the compiler has been converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow` attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
r? ````@davidtwco````
Toggle assert_unsafe_precondition in codegen instead of expansion
The goal of this PR is to make some of the unsafe precondition checks in the standard library available in debug builds. Some UI tests are included to verify that it does that.
The diff is large, but most of it is blessing mir-opt tests and I've also split up this PR so it can be reviewed commit-by-commit.
This PR:
1. Adds a new intrinsic, `debug_assertions` which is lowered to a new MIR NullOp, and only to a constant after monomorphization
2. Rewrites `assume_unsafe_precondition` to check the new intrinsic, and be monomorphic.
3. Skips codegen of the `assume` intrinsic in unoptimized builds, because that was silly before but with these checks it's *very* silly
4. The checks with the most overhead are `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` and `NonNull::new_unchecked`. I've simply added `#[cfg(debug_assertions)]` to the checks for `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` because I was unable to come up with any (good) ideas for decreasing their impact. But for `NonNull::new_unchecked` I found that the majority of callers can use a different function, often a safe one.
Yes, this PR slows down the compile time of some programs. But in our benchmark suite it's never more than 1% icount, and the average icount change in debug-full programs is 0.22%. I think that is acceptable for such an improvement in developer experience.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120539#issuecomment-1922687101
Remove unused args from functions
`#[instrument]` suppresses the unused arguments from a function, *and* suppresses unused methods too! This PR removes things which are only used via `#[instrument]` calls, and fixes some other errors (privacy?) that I will comment inline.
It's possible that some of these arguments were being passed in for the purposes of being instrumented, but I am unconvinced by most of them.
Introduce `enter_forall` to supercede `instantiate_binder_with_placeholders`
r? `@lcnr`
Long term we'd like to experiment with decrementing the universe count after "exiting" binders so that we do not end up creating infer vars in non-root universes even when they logically reside in the root universe. The fact that we dont do this currently results in a number of issues in the new trait solver where we consider goals to be ambiguous because otherwise it would require lowering the universe of an infer var. i.e. the goal `?x.0 eq <T as Trait<?y.1>>::Assoc` where the alias is rigid would not be able to instantiate `?x` with the alias as there would be a universe error.
This PR is the first-ish sort of step towards being able to implement this as eventually we would want to decrement the universe in `enter_forall`. Unfortunately its Difficult to actually implement decrementing universes nicely so this is a separate step which moves us closer to the long term goal ✨
improve pretty printing for associated items in trait objects
* Don't print a binder in front of associated items, because it's not valid syntax.
* e.g. print `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, Assoc = &'a u8>` instead of `dyn for<'a> Trait<'a, for<'a> Assoc = &'a u8>`.
* Don't print associated items that are implied by a supertrait bound.
* e.g. if we have `trait Sub: Super<Assoc = u8> {}`, then just print `dyn Sub` instead of `dyn Sub<Assoc = u8>`.
I've added the test in the first commit, so you can see the diff of the compiler output in the second commit.
Reconstify `Add`
r? project-const-traits
I'm not happy with the ui test changes (or failures because I did not bless them and include the diffs in this PR). There is at least some bugs I need to look and try fix:
1. A third duplicated diagnostic when a consumer crate that does not have `effects` enabled has a trait selection error for an upstream const_trait trait. See tests/ui/ufcs/ufcs-qpath-self-mismatch.rs.
2. For some reason, making `Add` a const trait would stop us from suggesting `T: Add` when we try to add two `T`s without that bound. See tests/ui/suggestions/issue-97677.rs
Record coroutine kind in coroutine generics
Oops, added a new substitution (the "kind" ty) to coroutines but forgot to record it in the `generics_of`. I'm surprised I left this out of the coroutine-closure PR -- I thought I made this change; I possibly rebased it out by accident.
Fixes#120732
r? oli-obk
MirPass: make name more const
Continues #120161, this time applied to `MirPass` instead of `MirLint`, locally shaves few (very few) instructions off.
r? ``@cjgillot``
Don't expect early-bound region to be local when reporting errors in RPITIT well-formedness
The implicit lifetime in the example code gets replaced with `ReError`, which fails a `sub_regions` check in the lexical region solver. Error reporting ends up calling `is_suitable_region` on an early bound region in the *trait* definition. This causes an ICE because we `expect_local()`.
This is kind of a bad explanation, but this code just makes diagnostics reporting a bit more gracefully fallible. If the reviewer wants a thorough investigation of exactly where we get this region outlives obligation, I can write one up. Doesn't really seem worth it, though, imo.
Fixes#120638Fixes#120648
