Improve suggestion to change struct field to &mut
r? ``@estebank``
Now displays a proper underline style suggestion instead of including the code change inline with the message.
Implement let-else type annotations natively
Tracking issue: #87335Fixes#89688, fixes#89807, edit: fixes #89960 as well
As explained in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89688#issuecomment-940405082, the previous desugaring moved the let-else scrutinee into a dummy variable, which meant if you wanted to refer to it again in the else block, it had moved.
This introduces a new hir type, ~~`hir::LetExpr`~~ `hir::Let`, which takes over all the fields of `hir::ExprKind::Let(...)` and adds an optional type annotation. The `hir::Let` is then treated like a `hir::Local` when type checking a function body, specifically:
* `GatherLocalsVisitor` overrides a new `Visitor::visit_let_expr` and does pretty much exactly what it does for `visit_local`, assigning a local type to the `hir::Let` ~~(they could be deduplicated but they are right next to each other, so at least we know they're the same)~~
* It reuses the code in `check_decl_local` to typecheck the `hir::Let`, simply returning 'bool' for the expression type after doing that.
* ~~`FnCtxt::check_expr_let` passes this local type in to `demand_scrutinee_type`, and then imitates check_decl_local's pattern checking~~
* ~~`demand_scrutinee_type` (the blindest change for me, please give this extra scrutiny) uses this local type instead of of creating a new one~~
* ~~Just realised the `check_expr_with_needs` was passing NoExpectation further down, need to pass the type there too. And apparently this Expectation API already exists.~~
Some other misc notes:
* ~~Is the clippy code supposed to be autoformatted? I tried not to give huge diffs but maybe some rustfmt changes simply haven't hit it yet.~~
* in `rustc_ast_lowering/src/block.rs`, I noticed some existing `self.alias_attrs()` calls in `LoweringContext::lower_stmts` seem to be copying attributes from the lowered locals/etc to the statements. Is that right? I'm new at this, I don't know.
Implement normalize_erasing_regions queries in terms of 'try' version
Attempt to lessen performance regression caused by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91255
r? `@jackh726`
extend `simplify_type`
might cause a slight perf inprovement and imo more accurately represents what types there are.
considering that I was going to use this in #85048 it seems like we might need this in the future anyways 🤷
Make `TyS::is_suggestable` check for non-suggestable types structually
Not sure if I went overboard checking substs in dyn types, etc. Let me know if I should simplify this function.
Fixes#91832
Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_codegen_ssa`
See #91867 for more information.
In `compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/coverageinfo/map.rs`, there are several functions with an explicit `'a` lifetime but only a single `&'a self` parameter. These lifetimes should be redundant given lifetime elision, unless the existential `impl Iterator` has weird issues regarding that. Should the redundant lifetimes be removed?
Handle unordered const/ty generics for object lifetime defaults
*feel like I should have a PR description but cant think of what to put here*
r? ```@lcnr```
Stabilize `iter::zip`
Hello all!
As the tracking issue (#83574) for `iter::zip` completed the final commenting period without any concerns being raised, I hereby submit this stabilization PR on the issue.
As the pull request that introduced the feature (#82917) states, the `iter::zip` function is a shorter way to zip two iterators. As it's generally a quality-of-life/ergonomic improvement, it has been integrated into the codebase without any trouble, and has been
used in many places across the rust compiler and standard library since March without any issues.
For more details, I would refer to `@cuviper's` original PR, or the [function's documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/fn.zip.html).
Revert setting a default for the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET env var for linking
This reverts commit b376f5621b, which is the main part of #90499, because it turns out that this causes a good amount of breakage in crates relying on the old behavior. In particular `winit`, `coreaudio` and crates that depend on them are affected. Fixes#91372.
Background:
Before #90499 the behavior was the following: If MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET is not set, we pass the minimum supported OS version to LLVM but not to the linker. The linker default depends on the Xcode version and the version of the OS it is running on. That caused one known problem in libcurl with the most recent Xcode versions. #90499 passed the minumum supported version (10.7 for Macos x86-64) to the linker instead. This has shown to be problematic because some crates such as winit, coreaudio implicitly expect a newer minimum OS version. The libcurl issue has been fixed independently (see https://github.com/alexcrichton/curl-rust/issues/417), so a revert should not really be problematic.
Eventually we should probably mimic clang's behavior and fall back to the default of the currently configured Macos SDK for both the LLVM min os target version and MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET for linking. That would entail looking at the `Version` property of the `SDKSettings.json` in the currently configured SDK.
Use `OutputFilenames` to generate output file for `-Zllvm-time-trace`
The resulting profile will include the crate name and will be stored in
the `--out-dir` directory.
This implementation makes it convenient to use LLVM time trace together
with cargo, in the contrast to the previous implementation which would
overwrite profiles or store them in `.cargo/registry/..`.
Tweak errors coming from `for`-loop, `?` and `.await` desugaring
* Suggest removal of `.await` on non-`Future` expression
* Keep track of obligations introduced by desugaring
* Remove span pointing at method for obligation errors coming from desugaring
* Point at called local sync `fn` and suggest making it `async`
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:9:10
|
LL | boo().await;
| -----^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
| |
| this call returns `()`
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
help: do not `.await` the expression
|
LL - boo().await;
LL + boo();
|
help: alternatively, consider making `fn boo` asynchronous
|
LL | async fn boo () {}
| +++++
```
Fix#66731.
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Looser check for overflowing_binary_op
Fix for issue #91636 tight check resulted in ICE, this makes the check a little looser. It seems `eq` allows comparing of `supertype` and `subtype` if `lhs = supertype` and `rhs = subtype` but not vice versa, is this intended behavior ?
Return an error when `eval_rvalue_with_identities` fails
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Fixes#91725.
r? `@oli-obk`
Recover on invalid operators `<>` and `<=>`
Thanks to #89871 for showing me how to do this.
Next, I think it'd be nice to recover on `<=>` too, like #89871 intended, if this even works.
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
