Improve code for FileName retrieval in rustdoc
Some calls were performed twice (first in `is_real_and_local` and then in the function calling it). Also the `FileName` was matched on a few times too.
r? `@notriddle`
stop replacing bivariant args with `'static` when computing closure requirements
It is unnecessary, these get constrained when checking that the opaque type is well-formed.
It also results in the opaque type no longer being well formed. If you've got `fn foo<'a>() -> impl Sized + 'a` the opaque is `type Opaque<'a, 'aDummy> where 'a: 'aDummy, 'aDummy: 'a` where `'aDummy` is bivariant. If we call `foo::<'b>()` inside of a closure and its return type ends up in a type test, we start out with the WF `Opaque<'b, 'b>`, and then replace the bivariant `'b` with `'static`. `Opaque<'b, 'static>` is no longer well-formed. Given how these type tests are used, I don't think this caused any practical issues.
r? types
Fix MutVisitor's default implementations to visit Stmt's and BinOp's spans
The `Stmt` case is a bug introduced almost certainly unintentionally by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126993. The code _used_ to visit and mutate `span` correctly, but got changed as follows by that PR. Notice how `span` is **copied** into the output by `|kind| Stmt { id, kind, span }` which happens after the mutation in the correct code (red) and before the mutation in the incorrect code (green).
```diff
pub fn noop_flat_map_stmt<T: MutVisitor>(
Stmt { kind, mut span, mut id }: Stmt,
vis: &mut T,
) -> SmallVec<[Stmt; 1]> {
vis.visit_id(&mut id);
- vis.visit_span(&mut span);
let stmts: SmallVec<_> = noop_flat_map_stmt_kind(kind, vis)
.into_iter()
.map(|kind| Stmt { id, kind, span })
.collect();
if stmts.len() > 1 {
panic!(...);
}
+ vis.visit_span(&mut span);
stmts
}
```
rustdoc: Rename `set_back_info` to `restore_module_data`.
Follow-up to #133345, r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Most of the references to `info` got removed as it was clear that `module_data` makes more sense here. Makes it clearer that `save_module_data` and `restore_module_data` are a pair.
Update `NonZero` and `NonNull` to not field-project (per MCP#807)
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807#issuecomment-2506098540 was accepted, so this is the first PR towards moving the library to not using field projections into `[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*]` types.
`NonZero` was already using `transmute` nearly everywhere, so there are very few changes to it.
`NonNull` needed more changes, but they're mostly simple, changing `.pointer` to `.as_ptr()`.
r? libs
cc #133324, which will tidy up some of the MIR from this a bit more, but isn't a blocker.
Linux v6.13-rc1 contains commit 28e848386b92 ("rust: block: fix formatting
of `kernel::block::mq::request` module"), which in turn contains commit
c95bbb59a9b2 ("rust: enable arbitrary_self_types and remove `Receiver`"),
which is why we had a hash rather than a tag.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
compiletest: explain that UI tests are expected not to compile by default
```
error: ui test compiled successfully!
```
is not a very useful message for someone new to the test suite, so change the wording and add a note to explain
Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.11
This pulls in an update that supports ``@`-files` used to pass arguments to linkers to fix invocations on Windows that are large.
Closes#133649
[AIX] change AIX default codemodel=large
On AIX, for most libraries, we run out of Table of Contents (TOC) offsets very quickly due to the default 16-bit offset limit. We want the large code model should be used as the default to provide more TOC entries so the end user does not have to specify `-Ccode-model=large` for all their packages. This is even more of an issue with ThinLTO as the ThinLTO globals can very quickly use all available TOC entry.
In addition, on AIX, code with different code-model across different compilation units will not cause undefined behavior, so this is safe to do.
Remove `generic_associated_types_extended` feature gate
This PR retires nightly support for the `generic_associated_types_extended` feature. This feature hasn't received much attention in the last two years or so, and I believe the feature still remains both unsound and ICEy to use. I think that if we were to redesign and reimplement it, we'd want to first figure out how to implement it soundly, but in the mean time I'd prefer to clean this up.
r? ``@lcnr`` cc ``@jackh726`` who added this feature gate I think
improve TagEncoding::Niche docs, sanity check, and UB checks
Turns out the `niche_variants` range can actually contain the `untagged_variant`. We should report this as UB in Miri, so this PR implements that.
Also rename `partially_check_layout` to `layout_sanity_check` for better consistency with how similar functions are called in other parts of the compiler.
Turns out my adjustments to the transmutation logic also fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126267.
a release operation synchronizes with an acquire operation
Change:
1. `Calls to park _synchronize-with_ calls to unpark` to `Calls to unpark _synchronize-with_ calls to park`
2. `park synchronizes-with _all_ prior unpark operations` to `_all_ prior unpark operations synchronize-with park`
Use correct `hir_id` for array const arg infers
Fixes#133771
`self.next_id()` results in the `DefId` for the const argument, created from the hack introduced by #133468, having no `HirId` associated with it. This then results in an ICE in metadata encoding. Fixing this then results in *another* ICE where `encode_defs` was not skipping encoding `type_of` and other queries for `DefId`s when they correspond to a `ConstArgKind::Infer` node.
This only reproduces with a library crate as metadata is not encoded for binaries, and apparently we had 0 tests for `generic_arg_infer` for array lengths in a library crate so this was not caught :<
cc #133589 `@voidc`
r? `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
Reduce false positives on some common cases from if-let-rescope lint
r? `@jieyouxu`
We would like to identify a very common case in the ecosystem in which we do not need to apply the lint suggestion for the new Edition 2024 `if let` semantics.
In this patch we excluded linting from `if let`s in statements and block tail expressions. In these simple cases, new Edition 2024 drop orders are identical to those of Edition 2021 and prior.
However, conservatively we should still lint for the other cases, because [this example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=2113df5ce78f161d32a1190faf5c7469) shows that the drop order changes are very pronounced, some of which are even sensitive to runtime data.
Gate async fn trait bound modifier on `async_trait_bounds`
This PR moves `async Fn()` trait bounds into a new feature gate: `feature(async_trait_bounds)`. The general vibe is that we will most likely stabilize the `feature(async_closure)` *without* the `async Fn()` trait bound modifier, so we need to gate that separately.
We're trying to work on the general vision of `async` trait bound modifier general in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710, however that RFC still needs more time for consensus to converge, and we've decided that the value that users get from calling the bound `async Fn()` is *not really* worth blocking landing async closures in general.
switch `jemalloc-sys` back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys`, and update to 0.6.0
Some context:
- we used to use jemalloc bindings from https://github.com/gnzlbg/jemallocator, since #55238
- that crate was abandoned, picked up as a fork in https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator, so we switched to that in #83152.
- then they were able to publish to the original `jemalloc-sys` bindings crate, and `jemalloc-sys` and `tikv-jemalloc-sys` became the same thing -- so I switched back to the OG crate in #96790
- they're now having publishing problems again: I've been waiting for https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator/pull/96 for the `jemalloc-sys` 0.6.0 update for a few months, but `tikv-jemalloc-sys` is already updated to 0.6.0.
A perf run showed some improvements, so this PR switches back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys` to update to 0.6.0.
It is unnecessary, these get constrained when checking that the
opaque type is well-formed.
It also results in the opaque type no longer being well formed.
If you've got `fn foo<'a>() -> impl Sized + 'a` the opaque is
`type Opaque<'a, 'aDummy> where 'a: 'aDummy, 'aDummy: 'a` where
`'aDummy` is bivariant. If we call `foo::<'b>()` inside of a closure
and its return type ends up in a type test, we start out with the WF
`Opaque<'b, 'b>`, and then replace the bivariant `'b` with `'static`.
`Opaque<'b, 'static>` is no longer well-formed. Given how these type
tests are used, I don't think this caused any practical issues.
