Commit Graph

57 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
The8472
2c6e67105e implement advance_(back_)_by on more iterators 2021-09-30 21:23:28 +02:00
Kornel
7dca8eb565 Use assert_matches! instead of if let {} else 2021-08-07 14:48:27 +01:00
Kornel
a294aa8d3d Hide allocator details from TryReserveError 2021-07-24 22:25:08 +01:00
hi-rustin
88abd7d81d Lint for unused borrows as part of UNUSED_MUST_USE 2021-06-18 15:09:40 +08:00
Muhammad Mominul Huque
507d97b26e Update expressions where we can use array's IntoIterator implementation 2021-06-02 16:09:04 +06:00
Giacomo Stevanato
c9595faa28 Make Vec::dedup panicking test actually detect double panics 2021-05-24 12:42:04 +02:00
the8472
7cb4e5180f from review: more robust test
This also checks the contents and not only the capacity in case IntoIter's clone implementation is changed to add capacity at the end. Extra capacity at the beginning would be needed to make InPlaceIterable work.

Co-authored-by: Giacomo Stevanato <giaco.stevanato@gmail.com>
2021-05-19 01:41:12 +02:00
The8472
a44a059c3b add regression test 2021-05-19 01:41:12 +02:00
The8472
60a900ee10 remove InPlaceIterable marker from Peekable due to unsoundness
The unsoundness is not in Peekable per se, it rather is due to the
interaction between Peekable being able to hold an extra item
and vec::IntoIter's clone implementation shortening the allocation.

An alternative solution would be to change IntoIter's clone implementation
to keep enough spare capacity available.
2021-05-19 01:41:09 +02:00
Dylan DPC
b943ea8cdc
Rollup merge of #83827 - the8472:fix-inplace-panic-on-drop, r=RalfJung
cleanup leak after test to make miri happy

Contains changes that were requested in #83629 but didn't make it into the rollup.

r? `````@RalfJung`````
2021-04-04 19:20:06 +02:00
Dylan DPC
869726d335
Rollup merge of #81619 - SkiFire13:resultshunt-inplace, r=the8472
Implement `SourceIterator` and `InPlaceIterable` for `ResultShunt`
2021-04-04 19:19:59 +02:00
the8472
572873fce0
suggestion from review
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
2021-04-04 01:38:58 +02:00
The8472
3bd241f95b cleanup leak after test to make miri happy 2021-04-04 01:37:05 +02:00
The8472
fa89c0fbcf add testcase for double-drop during Vec in-place collection 2021-03-29 04:39:23 +02:00
Soveu
b0092bc995 Vec::dedup optimization - add benches 2021-03-16 14:41:26 +01:00
Soveu
96d6f22a8e
Merge branch 'master' into dedup 2021-03-15 21:51:38 +01:00
Soveu
2285f11724 Vec::dedup optimization - add test for panic 2021-03-15 21:26:22 +01:00
Soveu
2abab1f688 Vec::dedup optimization - add tests 2021-03-15 20:24:35 +01:00
Waffle
1f031d95de Add regression test for Vec::extend_from_within leak 2021-03-04 17:10:57 +03:00
Waffle
9c4e3af39d Add test that Vec::spare_capacity_mut doesn't invalidate pointers 2021-03-03 01:00:59 +03:00
Hanif Bin Ariffin
fa9af6a9be Added tests to drain an empty vec
Discovered this kind of issue in an unrelated library.
The author copied the tests from here and AFAIK, there are no tests for this particular case.

Signed-off-by: Hanif Bin Ariffin <hanif.ariffin.4326@gmail.com>
2021-02-13 11:18:36 +08:00
bors
1efd804983 Auto merge of #81126 - oxalica:retain-early-drop, r=m-ou-se
Optimize Vec::retain

Use `copy_non_overlapping` instead of `swap` to reduce memory writes, like what we've done in #44355 and `String::retain`.
#48065 already tried to do this optimization but it is reverted in #67300 due to bad codegen of `DrainFilter::drop`.

This PR re-implement the drop-then-move approach. I did a [benchmark](https://gist.github.com/oxalica/3360eec9376f22533fcecff02798b698) on small-no-drop, small-need-drop, large-no-drop elements with different predicate functions. It turns out that the new implementation is >20% faster in average for almost all cases. Only 2/24 cases are slower by 3% and 5%. See the link above for more detail.

I think regression in may-panic cases is due to drop-guard preventing some optimization. If it's permitted to leak elements when predicate function of element's `drop` panic, the new implementation should be almost always faster than current one.
I'm not sure if we should leak on panic, since there is indeed an issue (#52267) complains about it before.
2021-02-11 04:40:57 +00:00
Giacomo Stevanato
2fb56cc123 Update test to collect item with a different type than the original vec 2021-02-03 21:00:07 +01:00
Giacomo Stevanato
c6c8f3bf12 Move test 2021-02-01 17:16:54 +01:00
Waffle
d5c221107e add Vec::extend_from_within method
Implement <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2714>, changes from the RFC:
- Rename the method `append_from_within` => `extend_from_within`
- Loose :Copy bound => :Clone
- Specialize in case of :Copy

This commit also adds `Vec::split_at_spare` private method and use it to implement
`Vec::spare_capacity_mut` and `Vec::extend_from_within`. This method returns 2
slices - initialized elements (same as `&mut vec[..]`) and uninitialized but
allocated space (same as `vec.spare_capacity_mut()`).
2021-01-31 22:30:19 +03:00
oxalica
969e552355
Simplify and fix tests 2021-01-24 00:11:51 +08:00
oxalica
d6dec1ebe3
Optimize Vec::retain 2021-01-18 01:48:50 +08:00
Aaron Hill
6f91c32da6
Fix new 'unnecessary trailing semicolon' warnings 2020-11-26 17:08:36 -05:00
Alexis Bourget
42271a537a Move vec swap test 2020-10-17 18:48:20 +02:00
Alexis Bourget
4fd06b9bb5 Move vec-macro-repeat test 2020-10-17 18:48:20 +02:00
Alexis Bourget
4af560ecef Move zero-sized-vec-push test 2020-10-17 18:42:14 +02:00
bors
5779815f89 Auto merge of #74194 - mbrubeck:slice-eq, r=sfackler
Add PartialEq impls for Vec <-> slice

This is a follow-up to #71660 and rust-lang/rfcs#2917 to add two more missing vec/slice PartialEq impls:

```
impl<A, B> PartialEq<[B]> for Vec<A> where A: PartialEq<B> { .. }
impl<A, B> PartialEq<Vec<B>> for [A] where A: PartialEq<B> { .. }
```

Since this is insta-stable, it should go through the `@rust-lang/libs` FCP process.  Note that I used version 1.47.0 for the `stable` attribute because I assume this will not merge before the 1.46.0 branch is cut next week.
2020-10-07 01:20:11 +00:00
Alexis Bourget
f6a4189d05 Move vec-cycle-wrapped test 2020-09-21 21:50:27 +02:00
Alexis Bourget
6bc0357dad Move vec-cycle test 2020-09-21 21:50:27 +02:00
Mara Bos
1e2dba1e7c Use T::BITS instead of size_of::<T> * 8. 2020-09-19 06:54:42 +02:00
Ralf Jung
9d0a265b6c
Rollup merge of #76662 - RalfJung:lib-test-miri, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Fix liballoc test suite for Miri

Mostly, fix the regression introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75207 that caused slices (i.e., references) to be created to invalid memory or memory that has aliasing pointers that we want to keep valid. @dylni  this changes the type of `check_range` to only require the length, not the full reference to the slice, which indeed is all the information this function requires.

Also reduce the size of a test introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70793 to make it not take 3 minutes in Miri.

This makes https://github.com/RalfJung/miri-test-libstd work again.
2020-09-16 08:25:02 +02:00
Dylan DPC
fb9bb2b5ca
Rollup merge of #75146 - tmiasko:range-overflow, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Detect overflow in proc_macro_server subspan

* Detect overflow in proc_macro_server subspan
* Add tests for overflow in Vec::drain
* Add tests for overflow in String / VecDeque operations using ranges
2020-09-16 01:30:30 +02:00
Ralf Jung
c528d24196 fix slice::check_range aliasing problems 2020-09-15 23:14:41 +02:00
Ralf Jung
d888725fba reduce size of test_from_iter_specialization_with_iterator_adapters test in Miri 2020-09-15 23:03:07 +02:00
bors
6cae28165f Auto merge of #76682 - richkadel:vec-take, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Optimize behavior of vec.split_off(0) (take all)

Optimization improvement to `split_off()` so the performance meets the
intuitively expected behavior when `at == 0`, avoiding the current behavior
of copying the entire vector.

The change honors documented behavior that the original vector's
"previous capacity unchanged".

This improvement better supports the pattern for building and flushing a
buffer of elements, such as the following:

```rust
    let mut vec = Vec::new();
    loop {
        vec.push(something);
        if condition_is_met {
            process(vec.split_off(0));
        }
    }
```

`Option` wrapping is the first alternative I thought of, but is much
less obvious and more verbose:

```rust
    let mut capacity = 1;
    let mut vec: Option<Vec<Stuff>> = None;
    loop {
        vec.get_or_insert_with(|| Vec::with_capacity(capacity)).push(something);
        if condition_is_met {
            capacity = vec.capacity();
            process(vec.take().unwrap());
        }
    }
```

Directly using `mem::replace()` (instead of  calling`split_off()`) could work,
but `mem::replace()` is a more advanced tool for Rust developers, and in
this case, I believe developers would assume the standard library should
be sufficient for the purpose described here.

The benefit of the approach to this change is it does not change the
existing API contract, but improves the peformance of `split_off(0)` for
`Vec`, `String` (which delegates `split_off()` to `Vec`), and any other
existing use cases.

This change adds tests to validate the behavior of `split_off()` with
regard to capacity, as originally documented, and confirm that behavior
still holds, when `at == 0`.

The change is an implementation detail, and does not require a
documentation change, but documenting the new behavior as part of its
API contract may benefit future users.

(Let me know if I should make that documentation update.)

Note, for future consideration:

I think it would be helpful to introduce an additional method to `Vec`
(if not also to `String`):

```
    pub fn take_all(&mut self) -> Self {
        self.split_off(0)
    }
```

This would make it more clear how `Vec` supports the pattern, and make
it easier to find, since the behavior is similar to other `take()`
methods in the Rust standard library.

r? `@wesleywiser`
FYI: `@tmandry`
2020-09-15 05:01:17 +00:00
Rich Kadel
79aa9b15d7 Optimize behavior of vec.split_off(0) (take all)
Optimization improvement to `split_off()` so the performance meets the
intuitively expected behavior when `at == 0`, avoiding the current
behavior of copying the entire vector.

The change honors documented behavior that the method leaves the
original vector's "previous capacity unchanged".

This improvement better supports the pattern for building and flushing a
buffer of elements, such as the following:

```rust
    let mut vec = Vec::new();
    loop {
        vec.push(something);
        if condition_is_met {
            process(vec.split_off(0));
        }
    }
```

`Option` wrapping is the first alternative I thought of, but is much
less obvious and more verbose:

```rust
    let mut capacity = 1;
    let mut vec: Option<Vec<Stuff>> = None;
    loop {
        vec.get_or_insert_with(|| Vec::with_capacity(capacity)).push(something);
        if condition_is_met {
            capacity = vec.capacity();
            process(vec.take().unwrap());
        }
    }
```

Directly applying `mem::replace()` could work, but `mem::` functions are
typically a last resort, when a developer is actively seeking better
performance than the standard library provides, for example.

The benefit of the approach to this change is it does not change the
existing API contract, but improves the peformance of `split_off(0)` for
`Vec`, `String` (which delegates `split_off()` to `Vec`), and any other
existing use cases.

This change adds tests to validate the behavior of `split_off()` with
regard to capacity, as originally documented, and confirm that behavior
still holds, when `at == 0`.

The change is an implementation detail, and does not require a
documentation change, but documenting the new behavior as part of its
API contract may benefit future users.

(Let me know if I should make that documentation update.)

Note, for future consideration:

I think it would be helpful to introduce an additional method to `Vec`
(if not also to `String`):

```
    pub fn take_all(&mut self) -> Self {
        self.split_off(0)
    }
```

This would make it more clear how `Vec` supports the pattern, and make
it easier to find, since the behavior is similar to other `take()`
methods in the Rust standard library.
2020-09-13 14:32:29 -07:00
Ralf Jung
71a5c464d1 note that test_stable_pointers does not reflect a stable guarantee 2020-09-13 18:55:08 +02:00
Dylan DPC
1b24f1401d
Rollup merge of #76324 - ayushmishra2005:move_vec_tests_in_library, r=matklad
Move Vec slice UI tests in library

Moved some of Vec slice UI tests in Library as a part of #76268

r? @matklad
2020-09-07 01:18:07 +02:00
Dylan DPC
e488c4f187
Rollup merge of #76273 - CraftSpider:master, r=matklad
Move some Vec UI tests into alloc unit tests

A bit of work towards #76268, makes a number of the Vec UI tests that are simply running code into unit tests. Ensured that they are being run when testing liballoc locally.
2020-09-07 01:17:45 +02:00
Ayush Kumar Mishra
d16bbd1cb0 Move Vec slice UI tests in library 2020-09-04 17:18:26 +05:30
Tomasz Miąsko
d98bac4e4e Add tests for overflow in Vec::drain 2020-09-04 23:16:53 +02:00
Rune Tynan
2278c7255a
Remove vec-to_str.rs, merge the remaining test in with vec 2020-09-03 15:43:07 -04:00
The8472
435219dd82 remove empty Vec extend optimization
The optimization meant that every extend code path had to emit llvm
IR for from_iter and extend spec_extend, which likely impacts
compile times while only improving a few edge-cases
2020-09-03 20:59:35 +02:00
The8472
80638330f2 support in-place collect for MapWhile adapters 2020-09-03 20:59:32 +02:00
The8472
5530858a08 generalize in-place collect to types of same size and alignment 2020-09-03 20:59:31 +02:00