Reuse CrateNum for proc-macro crates even when cross-compiling
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56935.
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@alexcrichton`
Proc-macros are always compiled for the host, so this should be the same
in every way as recompiling the crate.
I am not sure why the previous code special-cased the target, since the
compiler properly gives an error when trying to load a crate for a
different host:
```
error[E0461]: couldn't find crate `dependency` with expected target triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--> /home/joshua/rustc4/src/test/ui/cfg-dependent.rs:8:2
|
LL | dependency::is_64();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `dependency`, target triple i686-unknown-linux-gnu: /home/joshua/rustc4/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/cfg-dependent/auxiliary/libdependency.so
```
I think another possible fix is to remove the check altogether. But I'm
not sure, and this fix works, so I'm not making the larger change here.
Update compiler-builtins to 0.1.47
Bumped to `0.1.47` to resolve missing symbols on `aarch` when linking
`cargo`. This was due to a recent change in a `cargo` dependency on
`curl` (upstream C library added code that uses the uncommon `long
double` type).
r? `@tmandry`
Make the specialized Fuse still deal with None
Fixes#85863 by removing the assumption that we'll never see a cleared iterator in the `I: FusedIterator` specialization. Now all `Fuse` methods check for the possibility that `self.iter` is `None`, and the specialization only avoids _setting_ that to `None` in `&mut self` methods.
Given that the previous example involves stepping forward from A to B,
the equivalent example on this line would make most sense as stepping
backward from B to A.
Bumped to `0.1.47` to resolve missing symbols on `aarch` when linking
`cargo`. This was due to a recent change in a `cargo` dependency on
`curl` (upstream C library added code that uses the uncommon `long
double` type).
FP fix and documentation for `branches_sharing_code` lint
Closesrust-lang/rust-clippy#7369
Related rust-lang/rust-clippy#7452 I'm still thinking about the best way to fix this. I could simply add another visitor to ensure that the moved expressions don't modify values being used in the condition, but I'm not totally happy with this due to the complexity. I therefore only documented it for now
changelog: [`branches_sharing_code`] fixed false positive where block expressions would sometimes be ignored.
Fix codeblocks overflow
Fixes#87043.
Instead of completely relying on `pulldown-cmark` (and its potential changes), I decided to move the generation of codeblocks HTML directly in rustdoc so we can unify the DOM and the CSS classes.
r? `@Nemo157`
expand: Support helper attributes for built-in derive macros
This is needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86735 (derive macro `Default` should have a helper attribute `default`).
With this PR we can specify helper attributes for built-in derives using syntax `#[rustc_builtin_macro(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]` which mirrors equivalent syntax for proc macros `#[proc_macro_derive(MacroName, attributes(attr1, attr2, ...))]`.
Otherwise expansion infra was already ready for this.
The attribute parsing code is shared between proc macro derives and built-in macros (`fn parse_macro_name_and_helper_attrs`).
This resolves all the problems we had around "normalizing" the representation of a Scalar in case it carries a Pointer value: we can just use Pointer if we want to have a value taht we are sure is already normalized.
Handle non-integer const generic parameters in debuginfo type names.
This PR fixes an ICE introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85269 which started emitting const generic arguments for debuginfo names but did not cover the case where such an argument could not be evaluated to a flat string of bits.
The fix implemented in this PR is very basic: If `try_eval_bits()` fails for the constant in question, we fall back to generating a stable hash of the constant and emit that instead. This way we get a (virtually) unique name and side step the problem of generating a string representation of a potentially complex value.
The downside is that the generated name will be rather opaque. E.g. the regression test adds a function `const_generic_fn_non_int<()>` which is then rendered as `const_generic_fn_non_int<{CONST#fe3cfa0214ac55c7}>`. I think it's an open question how to deal with this more gracefully.
I'd be interested in ideas on how to do this better.
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc `@dpaoliello` (do you see any problems with this approach?)
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` & `@nagisa` (who I've seen comment on debuginfo issues recently -- anyone else?)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86893
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87085 (Search result colors)
- #87090 (Make BTreeSet::split_off name elements like other set methods do)
- #87098 (Unignore some pretty printing tests)
- #87099 (Upgrade `cc` crate to 1.0.69)
- #87101 (Suggest a path separator if a stray colon is found in a match arm)
- #87102 (Add GUI test for "go to first" feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix 5707
changelog: ``[`redundant_clone`]``, fix#5707
# Root problem of #5707 :
```
&2:&mut HashMap = &mut _4;
&3:&str = & _5;
_1 = HashMap::insert(move _2,move _3, _);
```
generate PossibleBorrower(_2,_1) and PossibleBorrower(_3,_1).
However, it misses PossibleBorrower(_3,_2).
# My solution to #5707 :
When meet a function call, we should:
1. build PossibleBorrower between borrow parameters and return value (currently)
2. build PossibleBorrower between immutable borrow parameters and mutable borrow parameters (*add*)
3. build PossibleBorrower inside mutable borrow parameters (*add*)
For example:
```
_2: &mut _22;
_3: &mut _;
_4: & _;
_5: & _;
_1 = call(move _2, move _3, move _4, move _5);
```
we need to build
1. return value with parameter(current implementataion)
PossibleBorrower(_2,_1)
PossibleBorrower(_3,_1)
PossibleBorrower(_4,_1)
PossibleBorrower(_5,_1)
2. between mutable borrow and immutable borrow
PossibleBorrower(_4,_2)
PossibleBorrower(_5,_2)
PossibleBorrower(_4,_3)
PossibleBorrower(_5,_3)
3. between mutable borrow and mutable borrow
PossibleBorrower(_3,_2)
PossibleBorrower(_2,_3)
But that's not enough.
Modification to _2 actually apply to _22.
So I write a `PossibleBorrowed` visitor, which tracks (borrower => possible borrowed) relation.
For example (_2 => _22).
However, a lot of problems exist here.
## Known Problems:
1. not sure all `&mut`'s origin are collected.
I'm not sure how to deal with `&mut` when meet a function call, so I didn't do it currently.
Also, my implement is not flow sensitive, so it's not accurate.
```
foo(_2:&mut _, _3: &_)
```
This pr doesn't count _3 as origin of _2.
2. introduce false negative
`foo(_2, _3)` will emit PossibleBorrower(_3,_2) in this pr, but _3 and _2 may not have relation.
Clippy may feel that _3 is still in use because of _2, but actually, _3 is on longer needed and can be moved.
## Insight
The key problem is determine where every `&mut` come from accurately.
I think Polonius is an elegant solution to it. Polonius is flow sensitive and accurate.
But I'm uncertain about whether we can import Polonius in rust-clippy currently.
This pr actually is part of Polonius' functionality, I think.
# TODO
1. `cargo test` can't pass yet due to similar variable name
create method overview docs for core::option and core::result
The `Option` and `Result` types have large lists of methods. They each could use an overview page of methods grouped by category. These proposed overviews include "truth tables" for the underappreciated boolean operators/combinators of these types. The methods are already somewhat categorized in the source, but some logical groupings are broken up by the necessities of putting related methods in different `impl` blocks, for example.
This is based on #86209, but those are small changes and unlikely to conflict.
