They are infallible, and could not be actually used because
they will trigger an error when monomorphized, but it is better
to just remove them.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/402
Suggested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
The `unsupported` type is imported two times, as `super::unsupported` and as `crate::sys::unsupported`, throwing an error. Remove `super::unsupported` in favor of the other.
Document rustfmt on nightly-rustc
- Refactor the doc step for Rustdoc into a macro
- Call the macro for both rustdoc and rustfmt
- Add a `recursion_limit` macro to avoid overflow errors
This does not currently pass --document-private-items for rustfmt due to https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/8422#issuecomment-871082935.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` cc `@calebcartwright`
Add linked list cursor end methods
I add several methods to `LinkedList::CursorMut` and `LinkedList::Cursor`. These methods allow you to access/manipulate the ends of a list via the cursor. This is especially helpful when scanning through a list and reordering. For example:
```rust
let mut c = ll.back_cursor_mut();
let mut moves = 10;
while c.current().map(|x| x > 5).unwrap_or(false) {
let n = c.remove_current();
c.push_front(n);
if moves > 0 { break; } else { moves -= 1; }
}
```
I encountered this problem working on my bachelors thesis doing graph index manipulation.
While this problem can be avoided by splicing, it is awkward. I asked about the problem [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/linked-list-cursurmut-missing-methods/14921/4) and it was suggested I write a PR.
All methods added consist of
```rust
Cursor::front(&self) -> Option<&T>;
Cursor::back(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::front(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::back(&self) -> Option<&T>;
CursorMut::front_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
CursorMut::back_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
CursorMut::push_front(&mut self, elt: T);
CursorMut::push_back(&mut self, elt: T);
CursorMut::pop_front(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
CursorMut::pop_back(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
```
#### Design decisions:
I tried to remain as consistent as possible with what was already present for linked lists.
The methods `front`, `front_mut`, `back` and `back_mut` are identical to their `LinkedList` equivalents.
I tried to make the `pop_front` and `pop_back` methods work the same way (vis a vis the "ghost" node) as `remove_current`. I thought this was the closest analog.
`push_front` and `push_back` do not change the "current" node, even if it is the "ghost" node. I thought it was most intuitive to say that if you add to the list, current will never change.
Any feedback would be welcome 😄
Revert "Don't load all extern crates unconditionally"
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84738.
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83738.
For the "smart" load of external crates, we need to be able to access their items in order to check their doc comments, which seems, if not impossible, quite complicated using only the AST.
For some context, I first tried to extend the `IntraLinkCrateLoader` visitor by adding `visit_foreign_item`. Unfortunately, it never enters into this call, so definitely not the right place...
I then added `visit_use_tree` to then check all the imports outside with something like this:
```rust
let mut loader = crate::passes::collect_intra_doc_links::IntraLinkCrateLoader::new(resolver);
ast::visit::walk_crate(&mut loader, krate);
let mut items = Vec::new();
for import in &loader.imports_to_check {
if let Some(item) = krate.items.iter().find(|i| i.id == *import) {
items.push(item);
}
}
for item in items {
ast::visit::walk_item(&mut item);
for attr in &item.attrs {
loader.check_attribute(attr);
}
}
```
This was, of course, a failure. We find the items without problems, but we still can't go into the external crate to check its items' attributes.
Finally, `@jyn514` suggested to look into the [`CrateLoader`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/creader/struct.CrateLoader.html), but it only seems to provide metadata (I went through [`CStore`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/creader/struct.CStore.html) and [`CrateMetadata`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_metadata/rmeta/decoder/struct.CrateMetadata.html)).
I think we are too limited here (with AST only) to be able to determine the crates we actually need to import, but it's very likely that I missed something. Maybe `@petrochenkov` or `@Aaron1011` have an idea?
So until we find a way to make it work completely, we need to revert it to fix the ICE. Once merged, we'll need to re-open #68427.
r? `@jyn514`
Redefine `ErrorKind::Other` and stop using it in std.
This implements the idea I shared yesterday in the libs meeting when we were discussing how to handle adding new `ErrorKind`s to the standard library: This redefines `Other` to be for *user defined errors only*, and changes all uses of `Other` in the standard library to a `#[doc(hidden)]` and permanently `#[unstable]` `ErrorKind` that users can not match on. This ensures that adding `ErrorKind`s at a later point in time is not a breaking change, since the user couldn't match on these errors anyway. This way, we use the `#[non_exhaustive]` property of the enum in a more effective way.
Open questions:
- How do we check this change doesn't cause too much breakage? Will a crate run help and be enough?
- How do we ensure we don't accidentally start using `Other` again in the standard library? We don't have a `pub(not crate)` or `#[deprecated(in this crate only)]`.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79965
cc `@rust-lang/libs` `@ijackson`
r? `@dtolnay`
Implement printing of stack traces on LLVM segfaults and aborts
Implement #79153
Based on discussion, try to extend the rust_backtrace=1 feature to handle segfault or aborts in the llvm backend
Add stderr_locked, stdin_locked, and stdout_locked free functions
to obtain owned locked stdio handles in a single step. Also add
into_lock methods to consume a stdio handle and return an owned
lock. These methods will make it easier to use locked stdio
handles without having to deal with lifetime problems or keeping
bindings to the unlocked handles around.
Include terminators in instance size estimate
For example, drop glue generated for struct below, doesn't have any
statements, only terminators. Previously it received an estimate of 0,
the new estimate is 13 (6+5 drop terminators, +1 resume, +1 return).
```rust
struct S {
a: String,
b: String,
c: String,
d: String,
e: String,
f: String,
}
```
Originally reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69382#issue-569392141
The recursion_limit attribute avoids the following error:
```
error[E0275]: overflow evaluating the requirement `std::ptr::Unique<rustc_ast::Pat>: std::marker::Send`
|
= help: consider adding a `#![recursion_limit="256"]` attribute to your crate (`rustfmt_nightly`)
```
Allow anyone to add or remove any label starting with perf-
In order to fully realize planned changes to the performance tracking process, we'd like to allow anyone to change the perf related labels.
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Test for const trait impls behind feature gates
- Make the previous cross-crate tests use revisions instead of being separate files
- Added test for gating const trait impls.
cc ``@oli-obk`` ``@jonas-schievink``
fix(rustdoc): generics search
This commit adds a test case for generics, re-adds generics data
to the search index, and tweaks function indexing to use less space in JSON.
This partially reverts commit 14ca89446c.
Check the number of generic lifetime and const parameters of intrinsics
This pull request fixes#85855. The current code for type checking intrinsics only checks the number of generic _type_ parameters, but does not check for an incorrect number of lifetime or const parameters, which can cause problems later on, such as the ICE in #85855, where the code thought that it was looking at a type parameter but found a lifetime parameter:
```
error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/generics.rs:188:18:
expected type parameter, but found another generic parameter
```
The changes in this PR add checks for the number of lifetime and const parameters, expand the scope of `E0094` to also apply to these cases, and improve the error message by properly pluralizing the number of expected generic parameters.
Also an fix issue with tuple type names where we can't cast to them in
natvis (required by the visualizer for `HashMap`) because of
peculiarities with the natvis expression evaluator.
