Don't infer attributes of virtual calls based on the function body
Fixes (after backport) #137646.
Since we don't know the exact implementation of the virtual call, it might write to parameters, we can't infer the readonly attribute.
Reuse machinery from `tail_expr_drop_order` for `if_let_rescope`
Namely, it defines its own `extract_component_with_significant_dtor` which is a bit more accurate than `Ty::has_significant_drop`, since it has a hard-coded list of types from the ecosystem which are opted out of the lint.[^a]
Also, since we extract the dtors themselves, adopt the same *label* we use in `tail_expr_drop_order` to point out the destructor impl. This makes it much clear what's actually being dropped, so it should be clearer to know when it's a false positive.
This conflicts with #137444, but I will rebase whichever lands first.
[^a]: Side-note, it's kinda a shame that now there are two functions that presumably do the same thing. But this isn't my circus, nor are these my monkeys.
It mirrors `ExprKind::Binary`, and contains a `BinOpKind`. This makes
`AssocOp` more like `ExprKind`. Note that the variants removed from
`AssocOp` are all named differently to `BinOpToken`, e.g. `Multiply`
instead of `Mul`, so that's an inconsistency removed.
The commit adds `precedence` and `fixity` methods to `BinOpKind`, and
calls them from the corresponding methods in `AssocOp`. This avoids the
need to create an `AssocOp` from a `BinOpKind` in a bunch of places, and
`AssocOp::from_ast_binop` is removed.
`AssocOp::to_ast_binop` is also no longer needed.
Overall things are shorter and nicer.
Make -Z unpretty=mir suggest -Z dump-mir as well for discoverability
While debugging something else, I got quite annoyed with `-Z unpretty=mir` showing me post-processed MIR instead of the one just after it is built. I ended up asking on Zulip and got pointed to `-Z dump-mir`. While this feature is documented in the rustc dev guide, I think it'd be good if the possibility of making use of it was staring you in the face while you need it.
Teach structured errors to display short `Ty<'_>`
Make it so that in every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
Follow up to and response to the comments on #136898.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Change interners to start preallocated with an increased capacity
Inspired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137005.
Added a `with_capacity` function to `InternedSet`. Changed the `CtxtInterners` to start with `InternedSets` preallocated with a capacity.
This *does* increase memory usage at very slightly(by ~1 MB at the start), altough that increase quickly disaperars for larger crates(since they require such capacity anyway).
A local perf run indicates this improves compiletimes for small crates(like `ripgrep`), without a negative effect on larger ones.
ssa/mono: deduplicate `type_has_metadata`
The implementation of the `type_has_metadata` function is duplicated in `rustc_codegen_ssa` and `rustc_monomorphize`, so move this to `rustc_middle`.
Make it so that every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
remove `#[rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridde]`
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135031, we gained support for just leaving away the body. Now that the bootstrap compiler got bumped, stop using the old style and remove support for it.
r? `@oli-obk`
There are a few more mentions of this attribute in RA code that I didn't touch; Cc `@rust-lang/rust-analyzer`
New attribute parsing infrastructure
Another step in the plan outlined in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229
introduces infrastructure for structured parsers for attributes, as well as converting a couple of complex attributes to have such structured parsers.
This PR may prove too large to review. I left some of my own comments to guide it a little. Some general notes:
- The first commit is basically standalone. It just preps some mostly unrelated sources for the rest of the PR to work. It might not have enormous merit on its own, but not negative merit either. Could be merged alone, but also doesn't make the review a whole lot easier. (but it's only +274 -209)
- The second commit is the one that introduces new infrastructure. It's the important one to review.
- The 3rd commit uses the new infrastructure showing how some of the more complex attributes can be parsed using it. Theoretically can be split up, though the parsers in this commit are the ones that really test the new infrastructure and show that it all works.
- The 4th commit fixes up rustdoc and clippy. In the previous 2 they didn't compile yet while the compiler does. Separated them out to separate concerns and make the rest more palatable.
- The 5th commit blesses some test outputs. Sometimes that's just because a diagnostic happens slightly earlier than before, which I'd say is acceptable. Sometimes a diagnostic is now only emitted once where it would've been twice before (yay! fixed some bugs). One test I actually moved from crashes to fixed, because it simply doesn't crash anymore. That's why this PR Closes#132391. I think most choices I made here are generally reasonable, but let me know if you disagree anywhere.
- The 6th commit adds a derive to pretty print attributes
- The 7th removes smir apis for attributes, for the time being. The api will at some point be replaced by one based on `rustc_ast_data_structures::AttributeKind`
In general, a lot of the additions here are comments. I've found it very important to document new things in the 2nd commit well so other people can start using it.
Closes#132391Closes#136717
Greatly simplify lifetime captures in edition 2024
Remove most of the `+ Captures` and `+ '_` from the compiler, since they are now unnecessary with the new edition 2021 lifetime capture rules. Use some `+ 'tcx` and `+ 'static` rather than being overly verbose with precise capturing syntax.
Give `global_asm` a fake body to store typeck results, represent `sym fn` as a hir expr to fix `sym fn` operands with lifetimes
There are a few intertwined problems with `sym fn` operands in both inline and global asm macros.
Specifically, unlike other anon consts, they may evaluate to a type with free regions in them without actually having an item-level type annotation to give them a "proper" type. This is in contrast to named constants, which always have an item-level type annotation, or unnamed constants which are constrained by their position (e.g. a const arg in a turbofish, or a const array length).
Today, we infer the type of the operand by looking at the HIR typeck results; however, those results are region-erased, so during borrowck we ICE since we don't expect to encounter erased regions. We can't just fill this type with something like `'static`, since we may want to use real (free) regions:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() {
asm!("/* ... */", sym bar::<&'a ()>);
}
```
The first idea may be to represent `sym fn` operands using *inline* consts instead of anon consts. This makes sense, since inline consts can reference regions from the parent body (like the `'a` in the example above). However, this introduces a problem with `global_asm!`, which doesn't *have* a parent body; inline consts *must* be associated with a parent body since they are not a body owner of their own. In #116087, I attempted to fix this by using two separate `sym` operands for global and inline asm. However, this led to a lot of confusion and also some unattractive code duplication.
In this PR, I adjust the lowering of `global_asm!` so that it's lowered in a "fake" HIR body. This body contains a single expression which is `ExprKind::InlineAsm`; we don't *use* this HIR body, but it's used in typeck and borrowck so that we can properly infer and validate the the lifetimes of `sym fn` operands.
I then adjust the lowering of `sym fn` to instead be represented with a HIR expression. This is both because it's no longer necessary to represent this operand as an anon const, since it's *just* a path expression, and also more importantly to sidestep yet another ICE (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137179), which has to do with the existing code breaking an invariant of def-id creation and anon consts. Specifically, we are not allowed to synthesize a def-id for an anon const when that anon const contains expressions with def-ids whose parent is *not* that anon const. This is somewhat related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130443#issuecomment-2445678945, which is also a place in the compiler where synthesizing anon consts leads to def-id parenting issue.
As a side-effect, this consolidates the type checking for inline and global asm, so it allows us to simplify `InlineAsmCtxt` a bit. It also allows us to delete a bit of hacky code from anon const `type_of` which was there to detect `sym fn` operands specifically. This also could be generalized to support `const` asm operands with types with lifetimes in them. Since we specifically reject these consts today, I'm not going to change the representation of those consts (but they'd just be turned into inline consts).
r? oli-obk -- mostly b/c you're patient and also understand the breadth of the code that this touches, please reassign if you don't want to review this.
Fixes#111709Fixes#96304Fixes#137179
Use `edition = "2024"` in the compiler (redux)
Most of this is binding mode changes, which I fixed by running `x.py fix`.
Also adds some miscellaneous `unsafe` blocks for new unsafe standard library functions (the setenv ones), and a missing `unsafe extern` block in some enzyme codegen code, and fixes some precise capturing lifetime changes (but only when they led to errors).
cc ``@ehuss`` ``@traviscross``
Prune dead regionck code
We never encounter `ObligationCauseCode`s that correspond to region obligations that originate from "within" a body, since we don't do HIR regionck anymore on bodies. So prune some dead code.
fix ICE in layout computation with unnormalizable const
The first commit reverts half of 7a667d206c, where I removed a case from `layout_of` for handling non-generic unevaluated consts in array length, that I incorrectly assumed to be unreachable. This can actually happen with the combination of `feature(generic_const_exprs)` and `feature(trivial_bounds)`, because GCE makes anon consts inherit their parent's predicates and with an impossible predicate like `u8: A` it's possible to have an array whose length is an associated const like `<u8 as A>::B` that is not generic, but also can't be normalized:
```rust
#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]
#![feature(trivial_bounds)]
trait A {
const B: usize;
}
// With GCE + trivial bounds this definition is not a compile error.
// Computing the layout of this type shouldn't ICE.
struct S([u8; <u8 as A>::B])
where
u8: A;
```
---
The first commit also incidentally fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137308, which also managed to get an unnormalizable assoc const into an array length:
```rust
trait A {
const B: usize;
}
impl<C: ?Sized> A for u8 { //~ ERROR: the type parameter `C` is not constrained
const B: usize = 42;
}
// Computing the layout of this type shouldn't ICE, even with the compile error above.
struct S([u8; <u8 as A>::B]);
```
This happens, because we bail out from `codegen_select_candidate` with an error if the selected impl has unconstrained params to avoid leaking infer vars out of a query. `Instance::try_resolve` will then return `Ok(None)`, which for assoc consts roughly means "this const can't be evaluated in a generic context" and is treated as such: 71e06b9c59/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/queries.rs (L84) (and this can ICE if the const isn't generic: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135617).
However, here `<u8 as A>::B` is definitely not "too generic" and also not unresolvable due to an unsatisfiable `u8: A` bound, so I've included the second commit to change the result of `Instance::try_resolve` from `Ok(None)` to `Err(ErrorGuaranteed)` when resolving an assoc item to an impl with unconstrained generic params. This has the effect that `<u8 as A>::B` will now be normalized to `ConstKind::Error` in the example above.
This properly fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137308, by no longer treating `<u8 as A>::B` as unresolvable even though it clearly has a unique impl that it resolves to. It also has the effect of changing the layout error from `Unknown` ("the type may be valid but has no sensible layout") to `ReferencesError` ("a non-layout error is reported elsewhere") which seems more appropriate.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Ignore fake borrows for packed field check
We should not emit unaligned packed field reference errors for the fake borrows that we generate during match lowering.
These fake borrows are there to ensure in *borrow-checking* that we don't modify the value being matched (which is why this only occurs when there's a match guard, in this case `if true`), but they are removed after the MIR is processed by `CleanupPostBorrowck`, since they're really just there to cause borrowck errors if necessary.
I modified `PlaceContext::is_borrow` since that's used by the packed field check:
17c1c329a5/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/check_packed_ref.rs (L40)
It's only used in one other place, in the SROA optimization (by which fake borrows are removed, so it doesn't matter):
17c1c329a5/compiler/rustc_mir_dataflow/src/value_analysis.rs (L922)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137250
Do not deduplicate list of associated types provided by dyn principal
## Background
The way that we handle a dyn trait type's projection bounds is very *structural* today. A dyn trait is represented as a list of `PolyExistentialPredicate`s, which in most cases will be a principal trait (like `Iterator`) and a list of projections (like `Item = u32`). Importantly, the list of projections comes from user-written associated type bounds on the type *and* from elaborating the projections from the principal's supertraits.
For example, given a set of traits like:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
```
For the type `dyn Bar<i32, u32>`, the list of projections will be something like `[Foo<i32>::Assoc = i32, Foo<u32>::Assoc = u32]`. We deduplicate these projections when they're identical, so for `dyn Bar<(), ()>` would be something like `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
## Shortcomings 1: inference
We face problems when we begin to mix this structural notion of projection bounds with inference and associated type normalization. For example, let's try calling a generic function that takes `dyn Bar<A, B>` with a value of type `dyn Bar<(), ()>`:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
fn call_bar<A, B>(_: &dyn Bar<A, B>) {}
fn test(x: &dyn Bar<(), ()>) {
call_bar(x);
// ^ ERROR mismatched types
}
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:10:14
|
10 | call_bar(x);
| -------- ^ expected trait `Bar<_, _>`, found trait `Bar<(), ()>`
```
What's going on here? Well, when calling `call_bar`, the generic signature `&dyn Bar<?A, ?B>` does not unify with `&dyn Bar<(), ()>` because the list of projections differ -- `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]` vs `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
A simple solution to this may be to unify the principal traits first, then attempt to deduplicate them after inference. In this case, if we constrain `?A = ?B = ()`, then we would be able to deduplicate those projections in the first list.
However, this idea is still pretty fragile, and it's not a complete solution.
## Shortcomings 2: normalization
Consider a slightly modified example:
```rust
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
trait Mirror {
type Assoc;
}
impl<T> Mirror for T {
type Assoc = T;
}
fn call_bar(_: &dyn Bar<(), <() as Mirror>::Assoc>) {}
fn test(x: &dyn Bar<(), ()>) {
call_bar(x);
}
```
This fails in the new solver. In this example, we try to unify `dyn Bar<(), ()>` and `dyn Bar<(), <() as Mirror>::Assoc>`. We are faced with the same problem even though there are no inference variables, and making this work relies on eagerly and deeply normalizing all projections so that they can be structurally deduplicated.
This is incompatible with how we handle associated types in the new trait solver, and while we could perhaps support it with some major gymnastics in the new solver, it suggests more fundamental shortcomings with how we deal with projection bounds in the new solver.
## Shortcomings 3: redundant projections
Consider a final example:
```rust
trait Foo {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar: Foo<Assoc = ()> {}
fn call_bar1(_: &dyn Bar) {}
fn call_bar2(_: &dyn Bar<Assoc = ()>) {}
fn main() {
let x: &dyn Bar<Assoc = _> = todo!();
call_bar1(x);
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
call_bar2(x);
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
}
```
In this case, we have a user-written associated type bound (`Assoc = _`) which overlaps the bound that comes from the supertrait projection of `Bar` (namely, `Foo<Assoc = ()>`). In a similar way to the two examples above, this causes us to have a projection list mismatch that the compiler is not able to deduplicate.
## Solution
### Do not deduplicate after elaborating projections when lowering `dyn` types
The root cause of this issue has to do with mismatches of the deduplicated projection list before and after substitution or inference. This PR aims to avoid these issues by *never* deduplicating the projection list after elaborating the list of projections from the *identity* substituted principal trait ref.
For example,
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
```
When computing the projections for `dyn Bar<(), ()>`, before this PR we'd elaborate `Bar<(), ()>` to find a (deduplicated) projection list of `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
After this PR, we take the principal trait and use its *identity* substitutions `Bar<A, B>` during elaboration, giving us projections `[Foo<A>::Assoc = A, Foo<B>::Assoc = B]`. Only after this elaboration do we substitute `A = (), B = ()` to get `[Foo<()>::Assoc = (), Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`. This allows the type to be unified with the projections for `dyn Bar<?A, ?B>`, which are `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]`.
This helps us avoid shorcomings 1 noted above.
### Do not deduplicate projections when relating `dyn` types
Similarly, we also do not call deduplicate when relating dyn types. This means that the list of projections does not differ depending on if the type has been normalized or not, which should avoid shortcomings 2 noted above.
Following from the example above, when relating projection lists like `[Foo<()>::Assoc = (), Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]` and `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]`, the latter won't be deduplicated to a list of length 1 which would immediately fail to relate to the latter which is a list of length 2.
### Implement proper precedence between supertrait and user-written projection bounds when lowering `dyn` types
```rust
trait Foo {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar: Foo<Assoc = ()> {}
```
Given a type like `dyn Foo<Assoc = _>`, we used to previously include *both* the supertrait and user-written associated type bounds in the projection list, giving us `[Foo::Assoc = (), Foo::Assoc = _]`. This would never unify with `dyn Foo`. However, this PR implements a strategy which overwrites the supertrait associated type bound with the one provided by the user, giving us a projection list of `[Foo::Assoc = _]`.
Why is this OK? Well, if a user wrote an associated type bound that is unsatisfiable (e.g. `dyn Bar<Assoc = i32>`) then the dyn type would never implement `Bar` or `Foo` anyways. If the user wrote something that is either structurally equal or equal modulo normalization to the supertrait bound, then it should be unaffected. And if the user wrote something that needs inference guidance (e.g. `dyn Bar<Assoc = _>`), then it'll be constrained when proving `dyn Bar<Assoc = _>: Bar`.
Importantly, this differs from the strategy in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133397, which preferred the *supertrait* bound and ignored the user-written bound. While that's also theoretically justifiable in its own way, it does lead to code which does not (and probably should not) compile either today or after this PR, like:
```rust
trait IteratorOfUnit: Iterator<Item = ()> {}
impl<T> IteratorOfUnit for T where T: Iterator<Item = ()> {}
fn main() {
let iter = [()].into_iter();
let iter: &dyn IteratorOfUnit<Item = i32> = &iter;
}
```
### Conclusion
This is a far less invasive change compared to #133397, and doesn't necessarily necessitate the addition of new lints or any breakage of existing code. While we could (and possibly should) eventually introduce lints to warn users of redundant or mismatched associated type bounds, we don't *need* to do so as part of fixing this unsoundness, which leads me to believe this is a much safer solution.
Simplify `Postorder` customization.
`Postorder` has a `C: Customization<'tcx>` parameter, that gives it flexibility about how it computes successors. But in practice, there are only two `impls` of `Customization`, and one is for the unit type.
This commit simplifies things by removing the generic parameter and replacing it with an `Option`.
r? ````@saethlin````
The comments didn't make much sense to me. I asked Matthew Jasper on
Zulip about it and they said:
> I think that at the time I wanted to replace all (or most of) this
> with a reference to the HIR Id of the variable. I'll give this a look
> to see if it's still a reasonable idea, but removing the comments is
> fine.
and then:
> I don't think that changing this to an HirId would be better,
> recovering the information from the HIR seems like too much effort in
> exchange for making the MIR a little smaller.
`Postorder` has a `C: Customization<'tcx>` parameter, that gives it
flexibility about how it computes successors. But in practice, there are
only two `impls` of `Customization`, and one is for the unit type.
This commit simplifies things by removing the generic parameter and
replacing it with an `Option`.
Make fewer crates depend on `rustc_ast_ir`
I think it simplifies the crate graph and also exposes people less to confusion if downstream crates don't interact with `rustc_ast_ir` directly and instead just use its functionality reexported through more familiar paths.
r? oli-obk since you introduced ast-ir
The only visible change is to the filenames produce by `-Zdump-mir`.
E.g. before and after:
```
h.main.003-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
h.main.2-2-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
```
It also fixes a FIXME comment.
rustfmt doesn't touch it because it's a macro body, but it's large
enough that the misformatting is annoying. This commit improves it. The
most common problems fixed:
- Unnecessary multi-line patterns reduced to one line.
- Multi-line function headers adjusted so the parameter indentation
doesn't depend on the length of the function name. (This is Rust code,
not C.)
- `|` used at the start of lines, not the end.
- More consistent formatting of empty function bodies.
- Overly long lines are broken.
The `MirVisitable` trait is just a complicated way to visit either a
statement or a terminator. (And its impl for `Terminator` is unused.) It
has a single use.
This commit removes it, replacing it with an if/else, which is shorter
and simpler.
`visit_local` is the only method that doesn't call a corresponding
`super_local` method. This is valid, because `super_local` would be
empty. But it's inconsistent with every other case; we have multiple
other empty `super` methods: `super_span`, `super_ty`, etc.
This commit adds an empty `super_local` and makes `visit_local` call it.
Emit dropck normalization errors in borrowck
Borrowck generally assumes that any queries it runs for type checking will succeed, thinking that HIR typeck will have errored first if there was a problem. However as of #98641, dropck isn't run on HIR, so there's no direct guarantee that it doesn't error. While a type being well-formed might be expected to ensure that its fields are well-formed, this is not the case for types containing a type projection:
```rust
pub trait AuthUser {
type Id;
}
pub trait AuthnBackend {
type User: AuthUser;
}
pub struct AuthSession<Backend: AuthnBackend> {
data: Option<<<Backend as AuthnBackend>::User as AuthUser>::Id>,
}
pub trait Authz: Sized {
type AuthnBackend: AuthnBackend<User = Self>;
}
pub fn run_query<User: Authz>(auth: AuthSession<User::AuthnBackend>) {}
// ^ No User: AuthUser bound is required or inferred.
```
While improvements to trait solving might fix this in the future, for now we go for a pragmatic solution of emitting an error from borrowck (by rerunning dropck outside of a query) and making drop elaboration check if an error has been emitted previously before panicking for a failed normalization.
Closes#103899Closes#135039
r? `@compiler-errors` (feel free to re-assign)
Remove `rustc_middle::mir::tcx` module.
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in `rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame` indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl` blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`. This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in `mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
r? `@tmandry`
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in
`rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some
MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame`
indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the
code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl`
blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges
the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit
moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`.
This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in
`mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 2.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
r? Zalathar
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137095 (Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64)
- #137100 (HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses)
- #137105 (Restrict DerefPure for Cow<T> impl to T = impl Clone, [impl Clone], str.)
- #137120 (Enable `relative-path-include-bytes-132203` rustdoc-ui test on Windows)
- #137125 (Re-add missing empty lines in the releases notes)
- #137145 (use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests)
- #137149 (Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses
`rustc_hir_analysis::bounds::Bounds` with its methods is nowadays a paper-thin wrapper around `Vec<(Clause, Span)>`s and `Vec::push` essentially.
Its existence slightly annoyed me (and I keep opening its corresp. file instead of the identically named `bounds.rs` in `hir_ty_lowering/` that I actually want most of the time :P).
Opening to check if you agree with inlining it.
r? compiler-errors or reassign
Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64
I introduced the Hash64 and Hash128 types in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, essentially as a mechanism to prevent hashes from landing in our leb128 encoding paths. If you just have a u64 or u128 field in a struct then derive Encodable/Decodable, that number gets leb128 encoding. So if you need to store a hash or some other value which behaves very close to a hash, don't store it as a u64.
This reverts part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117603, which turned an encoded Hash64 into a u64.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, I don't expect this to be perf-sensitive on its own, though I expect that it may help stabilize some of the small rmeta size fluctuations we currently see in perf reports.
Overhaul `rustc_middle::limits`
In particular, to make `pattern_complexity` work more like other limits, which then enables some other simplifications.
r? ``@Nadrieril``
Start removing `rustc_middle::hir::map::Map`
`rustc_middle::hir::map::Map` is now just a low-value wrapper around `TyCtxt`. This PR starts removing it.
r? `@cjgillot`
First of all, note that `Map` has three different relevant meanings.
- The `intravisit::Map` trait.
- The `map::Map` struct.
- The `NestedFilter::Map` associated type.
The `intravisit::Map` trait is impl'd twice.
- For `!`, where the methods are all unreachable.
- For `map::Map`, which gets HIR stuff from the `TyCtxt`.
As part of getting rid of `map::Map`, this commit changes `impl
intravisit::Map for map::Map` to `impl intravisit::Map for TyCtxt`. It's
fairly straightforward except various things are renamed, because the
existing names would no longer have made sense.
- `trait intravisit::Map` becomes `trait intravisit::HirTyCtxt`, so named
because it gets some HIR stuff from a `TyCtxt`.
- `NestedFilter::Map` assoc type becomes `NestedFilter::MaybeTyCtxt`,
because it's always `!` or `TyCtxt`.
- `Visitor::nested_visit_map` becomes `Visitor::maybe_tcx`.
I deliberately made the new trait and associated type names different to
avoid the old `type Map: Map` situation, which I found confusing. We now
have `type MaybeTyCtxt: HirTyCtxt`.
The end goal is to eliminate `Map` altogether.
I added a `hir_` prefix to all of them, that seemed simplest. The
exceptions are `module_items` which became `hir_module_free_items` because
there was already a `hir_module_items`, and `items` which became
`hir_free_items` for consistency with `hir_module_free_items`.
It's always good to make `rustc_middle` smaller. `rustc_interface` is
the best destination, because it's the only crate that calls
`get_recursive_limit`.
It's similar to the other limits, e.g. obtained via `get_limit`. So it
makes sense to handle it consistently with the other limits. We now use
`Limit`/`usize` in most places instead of `Option<usize>`, so we use
`Limit::new(usize::MAX)`/`usize::MAX` to emulate how `None` used to work.
The commit also adds `Limit::unlimited`.
Because it's only used in `rustc_mir_transform`. (Presumably it is
currently in `rustc_middle` because lots of other MIR-related stuff is,
but that's not a hard requirement.) And because `rustc_middle` is huge
and it's always good to make it smaller.
valtree performance tuning
Summary: This PR makes type checking of code with many type-level constants faster.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 was merged, we observed a small perf regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136318#issuecomment-2635562821). This happened because that PR introduced additional copies in the fast reject code path for consts, which is very hot for certain crates: 6c1d960d88/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/fast_reject.rs (L486-L487)
This PR improves the performance again by properly interning the valtrees so that copying and comparing them becomes faster. This will become especially useful with `feature(adt_const_params)`, so the fast reject code doesn't have to do a deep compare of the valtrees.
Note that we can't just compare the interned consts themselves in the fast reject, because sometimes `'static` lifetimes in the type are be replaced with inference variables (due to canonicalization) on one side but not the other.
A less invasive alternative that I considered is simply avoiding copies introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 and comparing the valtrees it in-place (see commit: 9e91e50ac5 / perf results: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136593#issuecomment-2642303245), however that was still measurably slower than interning.
There are some minor regressions in secondary benchmarks: These happen due to changes in memory allocations and seem acceptable to me. The crates that make heavy use of valtrees show no significant changes in memory usage.
Rename rustc_middle::Ty::is_unsafe_ptr to is_raw_ptr
The wording unsafe pointer is less common and not mentioned in a lot of places, instead this is usually called a "raw pointer". For the sake of uniformity, we rename this method.
This came up during the review of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134424.
r? `@Noratrieb`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135549 (Document some safety constraints and use more safe wrappers)
- #135965 (In "specify type" suggestion, skip type params that are already known)
- #136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
- #136646 (Add a TyPat in the AST to reuse the generic arg lowering logic)
- #136874 (Change the issue number for `likely_unlikely` and `cold_path`)
- #136884 (Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug)
- #136885 (i686-linux-android: increase CPU baseline to Pentium 4 (without an actual change)
- #136891 (Check sig for errors before checking for unconstrained anonymous lifetime)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug
Lower it as a ZST instead of a const error, which we can handle mostly fine. Delay a bug so we don't accidentally support it tho.
r? BoxyUwU
Fixes#136855Fixes#136853Fixes#136854Fixes#136337
Only added one test bc that's really the crux of the issue (fn item in array length position).
Properly deeply normalize in the next solver
Turn deep normalization into a `TypeOp`. In the old solver, just dispatch to the `Normalize` type op, but in the new solver call `deeply_normalize`. I chose to separate it into a different type op b/c some normalization is a no-op in the new solver, so this distinguishes just the normalization we need for correctness.
Then use `DeeplyNormalize` in the callsites we used to be using a `CustomTypeOp` (for normalizing known type outlives obligations), and also use it to normalize function args and impl headers in the new solver.
Finally, use it to normalize signatures for WF checks in the new solver as well. This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/146.
Simplify intra-crate qualifiers.
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name. (Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
r? `@jieyouxu`
compiler: die immediately instead of handling unknown target codegen
We cannot produce anything useful if asked to compile unknown targets. We should handle the error immediately at the point of discovery instead of propagating it upward, and preferably in the simplest way: Die.
This allows cleaning up our "error-handling" spread across 5 crates.
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name.
(Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work
because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
We cannot produce anything useful if asked to compile unknown targets.
We should handle the error immediately at the point of discovery instead
of propagating it upward, and preferably in the simplest way: Die.
This allows cleaning up our "error-handling" spread across 5 crates.
rustc_middle: parallel: TyCtxt: remove "unsafe impl DynSend/DynSync"
rustc_middle: parallel: TyCtxt: remove "unsafe impl DynSend/DynSync"
We don't need to "short circuit trait resolution", because DynSend and DynSync are auto traits and thus coinductive
cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349
r? SparrowLii
``@rustbot`` label: +WG-compiler-parallel
(rustbot sometimes ignores me and doesn't attach labels on my behalf. rustbot banned me?)
