make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph
It has/had a glob re-export of `rustc_attr_data_structures`, which is a crate much lower in the graph, and a lot of crates were using it *just* (or *mostly*) for that re-export, while they can rely on `rustc_attr_data_structures` directly.
Previous graph:
Graph with this PR:
The first commit keeps the re-export, and just changes the dependency if possible. The second commit is the "breaking change" which removes the re-export, and "explicitly" adds the `rustc_attr_data_structures` dependency where needed. It also switches over some src/tools/*.
The second commit is actually a lot more involved than I expected. Please let me know if it's a better idea to back it out and just keep the first commit.
Stage0 bootstrap update
This PR [follows the release process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday) to update the stage0 compiler.
The only thing of note is 58651d1b31, which was flagged by clippy as a correctness fix. I think allowing that lint in our case makes sense, but it's worth to have a second pair of eyes on it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles
Fixes#140747
I think there are going to be a lot of cases where macros are expanded in the compiler resulting in span offsets, and I'd like to know how that's typically handled. Does it have to be handled specially every time?
The documentation is talking about other way using only raw pointers, but the example was use `std::slice::from_raw_parts_mut` which also create a reference. `std::ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut` should be used instead, and it also highlights the benefit of raw pointer manipulation compared to dereference, as the function doesn't need to be unsafe anymore.
Moreover, [`unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2024/unsafe-op-in-unsafe-fn.html) warning has been enabled since Edition 2024, so I've updated the examples to use unsafe blocks.
handle paren in macro expand for let-init-else expr
Fixes#131655
This PR modifies the codegen logic of the macro expansion within `let-init-else` expression:
- Before: The expression `let xxx = (mac! {}) else {}` expands to `let xxx = (expanded_ast) else {}`.
- After: The same expression expands to `let xxx = expanded_ast else {}`.
An alternative solution to this issue could involve handling the source code directly when encountering unused parentheses in `let-init-else` expressions. However, this approach might be more cumbersome due to the absence of the necessary data structure.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Check bare function idents for non snake-case name
This PR adds the check required to lint on bare function idents for non snake-case name.
Reported at #140089.
cc `@theemathas`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140056 (Fix a wrong error message in 2024 edition)
- #140220 (Fix detection of main function if there are expressions around it)
- #140249 (Remove `weak` alias terminology)
- #140316 (Introduce `BoxMarker` to improve pretty-printing correctness)
- #140347 (ci: clean more disk space in codebuild)
- #140349 (ci: use aws codebuild for the `dist-x86_64-linux` job)
- #140379 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove `weak` alias terminology
I find the "weak" alias terminology to be quite confusing. It implies the existence of "strong" aliases (which do not exist) and I'm not really sure what about weak aliases is "weak". I much prefer "free alias" as the term. I think it's much more obvious what it means as "free function" is a well defined term that already exists in rust.
It's also a little confusing given "weak alias" is already a term in linker/codegen spaces which are part of the compiler too. Though I'm not particularly worried about that as it's usually very obvious if you're talking about the type system or not lol. I'm also currently trying to write documentation about aliases and it's somewhat awkward/confusing to be talking about *weak* aliases, when I'm not really sure what the basis for that as the term actually *is*.
I would also be happy to just find out there's a nice meaning behind calling them "weak" aliases :-)
r? `@oli-obk`
maybe we want a types MCP to decide on a specific naming here? or maybe we think its just too late to go back on this naming decision ^^'
Implement a lint for implicit autoref of raw pointer dereference - take 2
*[t-lang nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123239#issuecomment-2727551097)*
This PR aims at implementing a lint for implicit autoref of raw pointer dereference, it is based on #103735 with suggestion and improvements from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103735#issuecomment-1370420305.
The goal is to catch cases like this, where the user probably doesn't realise it just created a reference.
```rust
pub struct Test {
data: [u8],
}
pub fn test_len(t: *const Test) -> usize {
unsafe { (*t).data.len() } // this calls <[T]>::len(&self)
}
```
Since #103735 already went 2 times through T-lang, where they T-lang ended-up asking for a more restricted version (which is what this PR does), I would prefer this PR to be reviewed first before re-nominating it for T-lang.
----
Compared to the PR it is as based on, this PR adds 3 restrictions on the outer most expression, which must either be:
1. A deref followed by any non-deref place projection (that intermediate deref will typically be auto-inserted)
2. A method call annotated with `#[rustc_no_implicit_refs]`.
3. A deref followed by a `addr_of!` or `addr_of_mut!`. See bottom of post for details.
There are several points that are not 100% clear to me when implementing the modifications:
- ~~"4. Any number of automatically inserted deref/derefmut calls." I as never able to trigger this. Am I missing something?~~ Fixed
- Are "index" and "field" enough?
----
cc `@JakobDegen` `@WaffleLapkin`
r? `@RalfJung`
try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: dist-various-2
Avoid re-interning in `LateContext::get_def_path`
The def path printer in `get_def_path` essentially calls `Symbol::intern(&symbol.to_string())` for simple symbols in a path. This accounts for ~30% of the runtime of get_def_path.
We can avoid this by simply appending the symbol directly when available.
This updates the lint-docs tool to default to the 2024 edition. The lint
docs are supposed to illustrate the code with the latest edition, and I
just forgot to update this in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133349.
Some docs needed to add the `edition` attribute since they were assuming
a particular edition, but were missing the explicit annotation.
The def path printer in `get_def_path` essentially calls
`Symbol::intern(&symbol.to_string())` for simple symbols in a path.
This accounts for ~30% of the runtime of get_def_path.
We can avoid this by simply appending the symbol directly when available.
Make #![feature(let_chains)] bootstrap conditional in compiler/
Let chains have been stabilized recently in #132833, so we can remove the gating from our uses in the compiler (as the compiler uses edition 2024).
Add `#[repr(u128)]`/`#[repr(i128)]` enums to `improper_ctypes_definitions`
This makes them warn whenever a plain `u128`/`i128` would. If the lang team decides to merge #137306 then this can be reverted.
Tracking issue: #56071
make abi_unsupported_vector_types a hard error
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558 by completing the transition; see that issue for context. The lint was introduced with Rust 1.84 and this has been shown in cargo's future breakage reports since Rust 1.85, released 6 weeks ago, and so far we got 0 complaints by users. There's not even a backlink on the tracking issue. We did a [crater run](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731#issuecomment-2286736295) when the lint was originally added and found no breakage. So I don't think we need another crater run now, but I can do one if the team prefers that.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131800 is done, so for most current targets (in particular, all tier 1 and tier 2 targets) we have the information to implement this check (modulo the targets where we don't properly support SIMD vectors yet, see the sub-issues of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558). If a new target gets added in the future, it will default to reject all SIMD vector types until proper information is added, which is the default we want.
This will need approval by for `@rust-lang/lang.` Cc `@workingjubilee` `@veluca93`
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135340 (Add `explicit_extern_abis` Feature and Enforce Explicit ABIs)
- #139440 (rustc_target: RISC-V: feature addition batch 2)
- #139667 (cfi: Remove #[no_sanitize(cfi)] for extern weak functions)
- #139828 (Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold)
- #139854 (Improve parse errors for stray lifetimes in type position)
- #139889 (Clean UI tests 3 of n)
- #139894 (Fix `opt-dist` CLI flag and make it work without LLD)
- #139900 (stepping into impls for normalization is unproductive)
- #139915 (replace some #[rustc_intrinsic] usage with use of the libcore declarations)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This will allow us to eagerly translate messages on a top-level
diagnostic, such as a `LintDiagnostic`. As a bonus, we can remove the
awkward closure passed into Subdiagnostic and make better use of
`Into`.
Add `explicit_extern_abis` Feature and Enforce Explicit ABIs
The unstable `explicit_extern_abis` feature is introduced, requiring explicit ABIs in `extern` blocks. Hard errors will be enforced with this feature enabled in a future edition.
RFC rust-lang/rfcs#3722
Update #134986
Fix `register_group_alias` for tools
In clippy we're looking at renaming `clippy::all` and registering an alias for it but currently that doesn't work for tools
The `lint_ids` of the alias are now populated at the time of registration to make it easier to handle
Overhaul `AssocItem`
`AssocItem` has multiple fields that only make sense some of the time. E.g. the `name` can be empty if it's an RPITIT associated type. It's clearer and less error prone if these fields are moved to the relevant `kind` variants.
r? ``@fee1-dead``
`hir::AssocItem` currently has a boolean `fn_has_self_parameter` field,
which is misplaced, because it's only relevant for associated fns, not
for associated consts or types. This commit moves it (and renames it) to
the `AssocKind::Fn` variant, where it belongs.
This requires introducing a new C-style enum, `AssocTag`, which is like
`AssocKind` but without the fields. This is because `AssocKind` values
are passed to various functions like `find_by_ident_and_kind` to
indicate what kind of associated item should be searched for, and having
to specify `has_self` isn't relevant there.
New methods:
- Predicates `AssocItem::is_fn` and `AssocItem::is_method`.
- `AssocItem::as_tag` which converts `AssocItem::kind` to `AssocTag`.
Removed `find_by_name_and_kinds`, which is unused.
`AssocItem::descr` can now distinguish between methods and associated
functions, which slightly improves some error messages.
add `naked_functions_rustic_abi` feature gate
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138997
Because the details of the rust abi are unstable, and a naked function must match its stated ABI, this feature gate keeps naked functions with a rustic abi ("Rust", "rust-cold", "rust-call" and "rust-intrinsic") unstable.
r? ````@traviscross````
