Add the `#[derive_const]` attribute
Closes#102371. This is a minimal patchset for the attribute to work. There are no restrictions on what traits this attribute applies to.
r? `````@oli-obk`````
resolve: More detailed effective visibility tracking for imports
Per-`DefId` tracking is not enough, due to glob imports in particular, which have a single `DefId` for the whole glob import item.
We need to track this stuff per every introduced name (`NameBinding`).
Also drop `extern` blocks from the effective visibility table, they are nominally private and it doesn't make sense to keep them there.
Later commits add some debug-only invariant checking and optimiaztions to mitigate regressions in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103965#issuecomment-1304256445.
This is a bugfix and continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102026.
resolve: Turn the binding from `#[macro_export]` into a proper `Import`
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91795.
```rust
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ }
```
is desugared to something like
```rust
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ } // Non-modularized macro_rules item
pub use m; // It's modularized reexport
```
This PR adjusts the internal representation to better match this model.
Fix E0433 No Typo Suggestions
Fixes#48676Fixes#87791Fixes#96625Fixes#95462Fixes#101637
Follows up PR #72923
Several open issues refer to the problem that E0433 does not suggest typos like other errors normally do. This fix augments the implementation of PR #72923.
**Background**
When the path of a function call, e.g. `Struct::foo()`, involves names that cannot be resolved, there are two errors that could be emitted by the compiler:
- If `Struct` is not found, it is ``E0433: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `Struct` ``.
- If `foo` is not found in `Struct`, it is ``E0599: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Struct` in the current scope``
When a name is used as a type, `e.g. fn foo() -> Struct`, and the name cannot be resolved, it is ``E0412: cannot find type `Struct` in this scope``.
Before #72923, `E0433` does not implement any suggestions, and the PR introduces suggestions for missing `use`s. When a resolution error occurs in the path of a function call, it tries to smart resolve just the type part of the path, e.g. `module::Struct` of a call to `module::Struct::foo()`. However, along with the suggestions, the smart-resolve function will report `E0412` since it only knows that it is a type that we cannot resolve instead of being a part of the path. So, the original implementation swap out `E0412` errors returned by the smart-resolve function with the real `E0433` error, but keeps the "missing `use`" suggestions to be reported to the programmer.
**Issue**
The current implementation only reports if there are "missing `use`" suggestions returned by the smart-resolve function; otherwise, it would fall back the normal reporting, which does not emit suggestions. But the smart-resolve function could also produce typo suggestions, which are omitted currently.
Also, it seems like that not all info has been swapped out when there are missing suggestions. The error message underlining the name in the snippet still says ``not found in this scope``, which is a `E0412` messages, if there are `use` suggestions, but says the normal `use of undeclared type` otherwise.
**Fixes**
This fix swaps out all fields in `Diagnostic` returned by the smart-resolve function except for `suggestions` with the current error, and merges the `suggestions` of the returned error and that of the current error together. If there are `use` suggestions, the error is saved to `use_injection` to be reported at the end; otherwise, the error is emitted immediately as `Resolver::report_error` does.
Some tests are updated to use the correct underlining error messages, and one additional test for typo suggestion is added to the test suite.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
Point only to the identifiers in the typo suggestions of shadowed names instead of the entire struct
Fixes#103358.
As discussed in the issue, the `Span` of the candidate `Ident` for a typo replacement is stored alongside its `Symbol` in `TypoSuggestion`. Then, the span of the identifier is what the "you might have meant to refer to" note is pointed at, rather than the entire struct definition.
Comments in #103111 and the issue both suggest that it is desirable to:
1. include names defined in the same crate as the typo,
2. ignore names defined elsewhere such as in `std`, _and_
3. include names introduced indirectly via `use`.
Since a name from another crate but introduced via `use` has non-local `def_id`, to achieve this, a suggestion is displayed if either the `def_id` of the suggested name is local, or the `span` of the suggested name is in the same file as the typo itself.
Some UI tests have also been modified to reflect this change.
r? `@cjgillot`
