Commit Graph

919 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicholas Nethercote
66e9b1149c Rearrange TokenTreesReader::parse_token_tree.
`parse_token_tree` is basically a match with four arms: `Eof`,
`OpenDelim`, `CloseDelim`, and "other". It has two call sites, and at
each call site one of the arms is unreachable. It's also not inlined.

This commit removes `parse_token_tree` by splitting it into four
functions and inlining them. This avoids some repeated conditional
tests and also some non-inlined function calls on the hot path.
2022-09-26 08:28:45 +10:00
Rageking8
a1062b9bdc
recover from struct nested in struct 2022-09-22 23:41:38 +08:00
Xiretza
ae56d2a118 Add missing code="" attributes to suggestion subdiagnostics 2022-09-22 17:25:50 +02:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
e52e2344dc FIX - adopt new Diagnostic naming in newly migrated modules
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs

UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic

[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`

FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way

DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method

FIX - broken test

FIX - Rebase conflict

UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
2022-09-21 11:43:22 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5b8152807c UPDATE - move SessionDiagnostic from rustc_session to rustc_errors 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
bors
b79b7d8b4e Auto merge of #101846 - chenyukang:fix-101793, r=davidtwco
Fix the wording of help msg for bitwise not

Fixes #101793
2022-09-21 12:32:54 +00:00
Michael Howell
14b27cfd11
Rollup merge of #100250 - cjgillot:recover-token-stream, r=Aaron1011
Manually cleanup token stream when macro expansion aborts.

In case of syntax error in macro expansion, the expansion code can decide to stop processing anything. In that case, the token stream is malformed. This makes downstream users, like derive macros, ICE.

In this case, this PR manually cleans up the token stream by closing all currently open delimiters.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96818.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80447.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81920.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91023.
2022-09-20 10:12:56 -07:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
Guillaume Gomez
9a72ded562
Rollup merge of #101859 - Rageking8:slight-vertical-formatting, r=compiler-errors
Slight vertical formatting
2022-09-16 13:07:18 +02:00
yukang
484b612909 use subdiagnostic for logical negation, bitwise not 2022-09-16 14:41:42 +08:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
yukang
4bf7d2ca91 tweak suggestion 2022-09-16 01:09:26 +08:00
Rageking8
6d7beafc87 slight vertical formatting 2022-09-15 23:51:43 +08:00
yukang
f43562b95b more tweak on diagnostic messages 2022-09-15 22:39:16 +08:00
yukang
98e20c097c fix #101797: Suggest associated const for incorrect use of let in traits 2022-09-15 16:15:38 +08:00
bors
750bd1a7ff Auto merge of #101313 - SparrowLii:mk_attr_id, r=cjgillot
make `mk_attr_id` part of `ParseSess`

Updates #48685

The current `mk_attr_id` uses the `AtomicU32` type, which is not very efficient and adds a lot of lock contention in a parallel environment.

This PR refers to the task list in #48685, uses `mk_attr_id` as a method of the `AttrIdGenerator` struct, and adds a new field `attr_id_generator` to `ParseSess`.

`AttrIdGenerator` uses the `WorkerLocal`, which has two advantages: 1. `Cell` is more efficient than `AtomicU32`, and does not increase any lock contention. 2. We put the index of the work thread in the first few bits of the generated `AttrId`, so that the `AttrId` generated in different threads can be easily guaranteed to be unique.

cc `@cjgillot`
2022-09-14 20:52:18 +00:00
bors
6153d3cbe6 Auto merge of #101212 - eholk:dyn-star, r=compiler-errors
Initial implementation of dyn*

This PR adds extremely basic and incomplete support for [dyn*](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/). The goal is to get something in tree behind a flag to make collaboration easier, and also to make sure the implementation so far is not unreasonable. This PR does quite a few things:

* Introduce `dyn_star` feature flag
* Adds parsing for `dyn* Trait` types
* Defines `dyn* Trait` as a sized type
* Adds support for explicit casts, like `42usize as dyn* Debug`
  * Including const evaluation of such casts
* Adds codegen for drop glue so things are cleaned up properly when a `dyn* Trait` object goes out of scope
* Adds codegen for method calls, at least for methods that take `&self`

Quite a bit is still missing, but this gives us a starting point. Note that this is never intended to become stable surface syntax for Rust, but rather `dyn*` is planned to be used as an implementation detail for async functions in dyn traits.

Joint work with `@nikomatsakis` and `@compiler-errors.`

r? `@bjorn3`
2022-09-14 18:10:51 +00:00
SparrowLii
1a3ecbdb6a make mk_attr_id part of ParseSess 2022-09-14 08:49:10 +08:00
Eric Holk
cf04547b0b Address code review comments 2022-09-13 14:50:12 -07:00
Camille GILLOT
cb5ea8d0b6 Emit an error instead of reconstructing token stream. 2022-09-13 19:47:50 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
8823634db8 Manually cleanup token stream when macro expansion aborts. 2022-09-13 19:46:01 +02:00
Eric Holk
eff35e59c6 Introduce dyn_star feature flag
The primary purpose of this commit is to introduce the
dyn_star flag so we can begin experimenting with implementation.

In order to have something to do in the feature gate test, we also add
parser support for `dyn* Trait` objects. These are currently treated
just like `dyn Trait` objects, but this will change in the future.

Note that for now `dyn* Trait` is experimental syntax to enable
implementing some of the machinery needed for async fn in dyn traits
without fully supporting the feature.
2022-09-12 16:55:55 -07:00
Nicholas Nethercote
d2df07c425 Rename {Create,Lazy}TokenStream as {To,Lazy}AttrTokenStream.
`To` is better than `Create` for indicating that this is a non-consuming
conversion, rather than creating something out of nothing.

And the addition of `Attr` is because the current names makes them sound
like they relate to `TokenStream`, but really they relate to
`AttrTokenStream`.
2022-09-09 17:25:38 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
a56d345490 Rename AttrAnnotatedToken{Stream,Tree}.
These two type names are long and have long matching prefixes. I find
them hard to read, especially in combinations like
`AttrAnnotatedTokenStream::new(vec![AttrAnnotatedTokenTree::Token(..)])`.

This commit renames them as `AttrToken{Stream,Tree}`.
2022-09-09 12:45:26 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
890e759ffc Move Spacing out of AttrAnnotatedTokenStream.
And into `AttrAnnotatedTokenTree::Token`.

PR #99887 did the same thing for `TokenStream`.
2022-09-09 12:00:46 +10:00
Dylan DPC
8d2a492d73
Rollup merge of #101515 - chenyukang:fix-101477, r=fee1-dead
Recover from typo where == is used in place of =

Fixes #101477
2022-09-08 20:48:37 +05:30
yukang
ddb225f1f5 fixes #101477: Recover from typo where == is used in place of = 2022-09-08 15:14:18 +08:00
Matthias Krüger
c365ce3ffd
Rollup merge of #101502 - TaKO8Ki:do-not-suggest-semicolon-for-macro-without-exclamation-mark, r=wesleywiser
Do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without `!`

Fixes a regression in #101490
2022-09-07 21:48:15 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
7ac124803f do not suggest a semicolon for a macro without ! 2022-09-07 03:59:47 +09:00
Guillaume Gomez
78968e5959
Rollup merge of #101457 - ChayimFriedman2:struct-field-semi, r=fee1-dead
Recover from using `;` as separator between fields

Partially fixes #101440 (only for record structs).

Doing that for tuple structs is harder as their parsing passes through a bunch of helper functions. I don't know how to do that. But [their error message is better anyway](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=cc6ee8bb2593596c0cea89d49e79bcb4) and suggests using a comma, even if it doesn't suggest replacing the semicolon with it.
2022-09-06 17:00:28 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
4d830b7775
Rollup merge of #101434 - JhonnyBillM:replace-session-for-handler-in-into-diagnostic, r=davidtwco
Update `SessionDiagnostic::into_diagnostic` to take `Handler` instead of `ParseSess`

Suggested by the team in [this Zulip Topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler).

`Handler` already has almost all the capabilities of `ParseSess` when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access `source_map` from the emitter in order to get a `Snippet` and the `start_point`. Not sure if adding these two methods [`span_to_snippet_from_emitter` and  `span_start_point_from_emitter`] is the best way to address this gap.

P.S. If this goes in the right direction, then we probably may want to move `SessionDiagnostic` to `rustc_errors` and rename it to `DiagnosticHandler` or something similar.

r? `@davidtwco`
r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-09-06 17:00:26 +02:00
bors
a594044533 Auto merge of #101362 - compiler-errors:unnecessary-let, r=cjgillot
Suggest removing unnecessary prefix let in patterns

Helps with #101291, though I think `@estebank` probably wants this:

> Finally, I think it'd be nice if we could detect that we don't know for sure and "just" swallow the rest of the expression (find the next ; accounting for nested braces) or the end of the item (easier).

... to be implemented before we close that issue out completely.
2022-09-06 08:49:54 +00:00
bors
6c358c67d4 Auto merge of #101241 - camsteffen:refactor-binding-annotations, r=cjgillot
`BindingAnnotation` refactor

* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`

One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.

I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
2022-09-06 03:16:29 +00:00
Chayim Refael Friedman
fbf11cfc13 Recover from using ; as separator between fields 2022-09-05 19:15:23 +00:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
321e60bf34 UPDATE - into_diagnostic to take a Handler instead of a ParseSess
Suggested by the team in this Zulip Topic https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler

Handler already has almost all the capabilities of ParseSess when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access source_map from the emitter in order to get a Snippet and the start_point. Not sure if this is the best way to address this gap
2022-09-05 02:18:45 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
57198b549f remove redundant clones 2022-09-03 07:58:41 +02:00
Michael Goulet
91674cc56c Suggest removing unnecessary prefix let in patterns 2022-09-03 05:39:46 +00:00
Cameron Steffen
02ba216e3c Refactor and re-use BindingAnnotation 2022-09-02 12:55:05 -05:00
Oli Scherer
ee3c835018 Always import all tracing macros for the entire crate instead of piecemeal by module 2022-09-01 14:54:27 +00:00
bors
eac6c33bc6 Auto merge of #100869 - nnethercote:replace-ThinVec, r=spastorino
Replace `rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` with `thin_vec::ThinVec`

`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` looks like this:
```
pub struct ThinVec<T>(Option<Box<Vec<T>>>);
```
It's just a zero word if the vector is empty, but requires two
allocations if it is non-empty. So it's only usable in cases where the
vector is empty most of the time.

This commit removes it in favour of `thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is also
word-sized, but stores the length and capacity in the same allocation as
the elements. It's good in a wider variety of situation, e.g. in enum
variants where the vector is usually/always non-empty.

The commit also:
- Sorts some `Cargo.toml` dependency lists, to make additions easier.
- Sorts some `use` item lists, to make additions easier.
- Changes `clean_trait_ref_with_bindings` to take a
  `ThinVec<TypeBinding>` rather than a `&[TypeBinding]`, because this
  avoid some unnecessary allocations.

r? `@spastorino`
2022-09-01 08:01:06 +00:00
Dezhi Wu
b1430fb7ca Fix a bunch of typo
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].

I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.

[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2022-08-31 18:24:55 +08:00
Nilstrieb
d1ef8180f9 Revert let_chains stabilization
This reverts commit 3266460749.

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29 19:34:11 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
c768617f6f Improve parse_dot_or_call_expr_with.
Avoid all the extra work in the very common case where `attrs` is empty.
2022-08-29 15:42:16 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
b38106b6d8 Replace rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec with thin_vec::ThinVec.
`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` looks like this:
```
pub struct ThinVec<T>(Option<Box<Vec<T>>>);
```
It's just a zero word if the vector is empty, but requires two
allocations if it is non-empty. So it's only usable in cases where the
vector is empty most of the time.

This commit removes it in favour of `thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is also
word-sized, but stores the length and capacity in the same allocation as
the elements. It's good in a wider variety of situation, e.g. in enum
variants where the vector is usually/always non-empty.

The commit also:
- Sorts some `Cargo.toml` dependency lists, to make additions easier.
- Sorts some `use` item lists, to make additions easier.
- Changes `clean_trait_ref_with_bindings` to take a
  `ThinVec<TypeBinding>` rather than a `&[TypeBinding]`, because this
  avoid some unnecessary allocations.
2022-08-29 15:42:13 +10:00
bors
ce36e88256 Auto merge of #100497 - kadiwa4:remove_clone_into_iter, r=cjgillot
Avoid cloning a collection only to iterate over it

`@rustbot` label: +C-cleanup
2022-08-28 18:31:08 +00:00
Yuki Okushi
ed8cfc86a2
Rollup merge of #100188 - chenyukang:fix-issue-100165, r=estebank
Parser will not suggest invalid expression when use public

Fixes #100165
2022-08-25 08:50:56 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
f4550a6edf
Rollup merge of #99332 - jyn514:stabilize-label-break-value, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize `#![feature(label_break_value)]`

See the stabilization report in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1186213313.
2022-08-25 08:50:54 +09:00
Joshua Nelson
31e39446ec Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Dylan DPC
28ead17745
Rollup merge of #100909 - nnethercote:minor-ast-LitKind-improvement, r=petrochenkov
Minor `ast::LitKind` improvements

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-08-23 20:40:09 +05:30
yukang
351acc87f5 parser will not give wrong help message for 'public' 2022-08-23 17:02:40 +08:00
Nicholas Nethercote
6087dc2054 Remove the symbol from ast::LitKind::Err.
Because it's never used meaningfully.
2022-08-23 16:56:24 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
54d0f50677
Rollup merge of #100565 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-adding-missing-semicolon-before-item, r=compiler-errors
Suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item

fixes #100533
2022-08-23 06:55:24 +02:00
Dylan DPC
75b7089d1e
Rollup merge of #100713 - Xiretza:parser-expr-session-diagnostics, r=estebank
Convert diagnostics in parser/expr to SessionDiagnostic

This migrates all the easy cases in `rustc_parse::parser::expr` to `SessionDiagnostic`s, I've left things such as `multipart_suggestion`s out for now in the hopes of a derive API being developed soon.
2022-08-22 20:34:14 +05:30
Dylan DPC
3842117ef2
Rollup merge of #99915 - WaffleLapkin:recover_keyword_bounds, r=compiler-errors
Recover keywords in trait bounds

(_this pr was inspired by [this tweet](https://twitter.com/Azumanga/status/1552982326409367561)_)

Recover keywords in trait bound, motivational example:
```rust
fn f(_: impl fn()) {} // mistyped, meant `Fn`
```

<details><summary>Current nightly (3 needless and confusing errors!)</summary>
<p>

```text
error: expected identifier, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |               ^^ expected identifier, found keyword
  |
help: escape `fn` to use it as an identifier
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl r#fn()) {}
  |               ++

error: expected one of `:` or `|`, found `)`
 --> ./t.rs:1:19
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |                   ^ expected one of `:` or `|`

error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `)`, `,`, `?`, `for`, `~`, lifetime, or path, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |              -^^ expected one of 9 possible tokens
  |              |
  |              help: missing `,`

error: at least one trait must be specified
 --> ./t.rs:1:10
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |          ^^^^
```

</p>
</details>

This PR:
```text
error: expected identifier, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |               ^^ expected identifier, found keyword
  |
help: escape `fn` to use it as an identifier
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl r#fn()) {}
  |               ++

error[E0405]: cannot find trait `r#fn` in this scope
  --> ./t.rs:1:15
   |
1  | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
   |               ^^ help: a trait with a similar name exists (notice the capitalization): `Fn`
   |
  ::: /home/waffle/projects/repos/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:74:1
   |
74 | pub trait Fn<Args>: FnMut<Args> {
   | ------------------------------- similarly named trait `Fn` defined here
```

It would be nice to have suggestion in the first error like "have you meant `Fn` trait", instead of a separate error, but the recovery is deep inside ident parsing, which makes it a lot harder to do.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-08-22 11:45:42 +05:30
Nicholas Nethercote
619b8abaa6 Use AttrVec in more places.
In some places we use `Vec<Attribute>` and some places we use
`ThinVec<Attribute>` (a.k.a. `AttrVec`). This results in various points
where we have to convert between `Vec` and `ThinVec`.

This commit changes the places that use `Vec<Attribute>` to use
`AttrVec`. A lot of this is mechanical and boring, but there are
some interesting parts:
- It adds a few new methods to `ThinVec`.
- It implements `MapInPlace` for `ThinVec`, and introduces a macro to
  avoid the repetition of this trait for `Vec`, `SmallVec`, and
  `ThinVec`.

Overall, it makes the code a little nicer, and has little effect on
performance. But it is a precursor to removing
`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` and replacing it with
`thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is implemented more efficiently.
2022-08-22 07:35:33 +10:00
Xiretza
ffcaa0dee2 Migrate diagnostics in parser/expr to SessionDiagnostic 2022-08-21 14:54:05 +02:00
Maybe Waffle
5d5e451618 recover const Tr bounds (no ~) 2022-08-21 14:58:42 +04:00
Xiretza
7f3a6fd7f6 Replace #[lint/warning/error] with #[diag] 2022-08-21 09:17:43 +02:00
bors
dd01122b5c Auto merge of #100564 - nnethercote:box-ast-MacCall, r=spastorino
Box the `MacCall` in various types.

r? `@spastorino`
2022-08-20 10:26:54 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
af89769c82
Rollup merge of #100750 - akabinds:akabinds/improved-invalid-function-qual-error, r=davidtwco
improved diagnostic for function defined with `def`, `fun`, `func`, or `function` instead of `fn`

Closes #99751
2022-08-20 07:09:05 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
eacbe5437e
Rollup merge of #100667 - Xiretza:diag-structs-parser-ivd, r=davidtwco
Migrate "invalid variable declaration" errors to SessionDiagnostic

After seeing the great blog post on Inside Rust, I decided to try my hand at this. Just one diagnostic for now to get used to the workflow and to check if this is the way to do it or if there are any problems.
2022-08-20 07:09:01 +02:00
akabinds
1b54ad0585 added improved diagnostic for a function defined with an invalid qualifier 2022-08-18 16:14:04 -05:00
Matthias Krüger
5548e585c1
Rollup merge of #100670 - Xiretza:parser-stmt-force-collect-docs, r=davidtwco
Fix documentation of rustc_parse::parser::Parser::parse_stmt_without_recovery

Something seems to have gotten out of sync during the creation of #81177, where both the argument and comment were introduced.
2022-08-18 05:10:49 +02:00
Xiretza
e8499cfadc Migrate "invalid variable declaration" errors to SessionDiagnostic 2022-08-17 19:08:37 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
d5dca26a94
Rollup merge of #100018 - nnethercote:clean-up-LitKind, r=petrochenkov
Clean up `LitKind`

r? ``@petrochenkov``
2022-08-17 12:32:49 +02:00
Xiretza
d3bf103d1b Fix documentation of rustc_parse::parser::Parser::parse_stmt_without_recovery
Something seems to have gotten out of sync during the creation of #81177,
where both the argument and comment were introduced.
2022-08-17 11:18:48 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
eafd0dfd05 Box the MacCall in various types. 2022-08-17 08:10:56 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
5d3cc1713a Rename some things related to literals.
- Rename `ast::Lit::token` as `ast::Lit::token_lit`, because its type is
  `token::Lit`, which is not a token. (This has been confusing me for a
  long time.)
  reasonable because we have an `ast::token::Lit` inside an `ast::Lit`.
- Rename `LitKind::{from,to}_lit_token` as
  `LitKind::{from,to}_token_lit`, to match the above change and
  `token::Lit`.
2022-08-16 13:41:34 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
9619a2e3a3 Avoid unnecessary cloning in Parser::get_ident_from_generic_arg. 2022-08-16 12:14:52 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
3e04fed6fa Remove {ast,hir}::WhereEqPredicate::id.
These fields are unused.
2022-08-16 12:13:23 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
e14d12cb66
Rollup merge of #100559 - nnethercote:parser-simplifications, r=compiler-errors
Parser simplifications

Best reviewed one commit at a time.

r? ``@compiler-errors``
2022-08-15 20:11:38 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
e369ec871e
Rollup merge of #100458 - compiler-errors:fn-argument-span, r=estebank
Adjust span of fn argument declaration

Span of a fn argument declaration goes from:

```
fn foo(i : i32 , ...)
       ^^^^^^^^
```

to:

```
fn foo(i : i32 , ...)
       ^^^^^^^
```

That is, we don't include the extra spacing up to the trailing comma, which I think is more correct.

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99646#discussion_r944568074
r? ``@estebank``

---

The two tests that had dramatic changes in their rendering I think actually are improved, though they are kinda poor spans both before and after the changes. 🤷 Thoughts?
2022-08-15 20:11:35 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
fece51174b
Rollup merge of #100566 - TaKO8Ki:use-create-snapshot-for-diagnostic, r=cjgillot
Use `create_snapshot_for_diagnostic` instead of `clone` for `Parser`

follow-up to #98020
2022-08-15 10:28:14 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
748925bf1b
Rollup merge of #100534 - Rageking8:Rageking8-refactor1, r=compiler-errors
Make code slightly more uniform
2022-08-15 10:28:13 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
84f0d5e460 use create_snapshot_for_diagnostic instead of clone for Parser 2022-08-15 16:42:58 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
40dcf89a26 suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item 2022-08-15 16:10:31 +09:00
Nicholas Nethercote
2ef0479568 Simplify attribute handling in parse_bottom_expr.
`Parser::parse_bottom_expr` currently constructs an empty `attrs` and
then passes it to a large number of other functions. This makes the code
harder to read than it should be, because it's not clear that many
`attrs` arguments are always empty.

This commit removes `attrs` and the passing, simplifying a lot of
functions. The commit also renames `Parser::mk_expr` (which takes an
`attrs` argument) as `mk_expr_with_attrs`, and introduces a new
`mk_expr` which creates an expression with no attributes, which is the
more common case.
2022-08-15 13:29:28 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
1e8497351d Streamline parse_path_start_expr.
Let-chaining avoids some code duplication.
2022-08-15 09:51:11 +10:00
Matthias Krüger
13b8b6ede0
Rollup merge of #100253 - obeis:issue-100197, r=cjgillot
Recover from mutable variable declaration where `mut` is placed before `let`

Closes #100197
2022-08-14 20:16:00 +02:00
Rageking8
44f878d75f
Make code slightly more uniform 2022-08-14 22:17:49 +08:00
Dylan DPC
7473484d52
Rollup merge of #100115 - obeis:issue-99910, r=cjgillot
Suggest removing `let` if `const let` or `let const` is used

Closes #99910
2022-08-14 17:09:15 +05:30
Michael Goulet
86e1d1e28f
Rollup merge of #100446 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-removing-semicolon-after-impl-trait-items, r=compiler-errors
Suggest removing a semicolon after impl/trait items

fixes #99822
2022-08-13 21:06:51 -07:00
Michael Goulet
2af344595a
Rollup merge of #99646 - compiler-errors:arg-mismatch-single-arg-label, r=estebank
Only point out a single function parameter if we have a single arg incompatibility

Fixes #99635
2022-08-13 21:06:46 -07:00
Michael Goulet
29f905bfaf
Rollup merge of #100475 - chenyukang:fix-100461, r=fee1-dead
Give a helpful diagnostic when the next struct field has an attribute

Fixes #100461
2022-08-13 14:10:12 -07:00
KaDiWa
4eebcb9910
avoid cloning and then iterating 2022-08-13 16:16:52 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
d47df26784 use span_suggestion instead of span_suggestion_verbose 2022-08-13 22:10:54 +09:00
yukang
52a15180d2 give a helpful diagnostic even when the next struct field has an attribute 2022-08-13 12:50:53 +08:00
Mark Rousskov
154a09dd91 Adjust cfgs 2022-08-12 16:28:15 -04:00
Michael Goulet
9b0edd099d Adjust span of fn arguments 2022-08-12 15:21:39 +00:00
Michael Goulet
237cbe91a8 Adjust span of closure param 2022-08-12 15:18:40 +00:00
Dylan DPC
9914c96f06
Rollup merge of #100396 - chenyukang:fix-100394, r=petrochenkov
Suggest const and static for global variable

Fixing #100394
2022-08-12 20:39:16 +05:30
Takayuki Maeda
48c0341a70 suggest removing a semicolon after impl/trait items 2022-08-12 18:11:01 +09:00
Matthias Krüger
6ae0414122
Rollup merge of #100350 - jhpratt:stringify-vis, r=cjgillot
Stringify non-shorthand visibility correctly

This makes `stringify!(pub(in crate))` evaluate to `pub(in crate)` rather than `pub(crate)`, matching the behavior before the `crate` shorthand was removed. Further, this changes `stringify!(pub(in super))` to evaluate to `pub(in super)` rather than the current `pub(super)`. If the latter is not desired (it is _technically_ breaking), it can be undone.

Fixes #99981

`@rustbot` label +C-bug +regression-from-stable-to-beta +T-compiler
2022-08-11 22:53:06 +02:00
Dylan DPC
b5f5bdce87
Rollup merge of #100351 - compiler-errors:diagnostic-convention, r=fee1-dead
Use `&mut Diagnostic` instead of `&mut DiagnosticBuilder` unless needed

This seems to be the established convention (02ff9e0) when `DiagnosticBuilder` was first added. I am guilty of introducing some of these.
2022-08-11 22:47:03 +05:30
chenyukang
98518c2379 suggest const or static for global variable 2022-08-11 23:15:39 +08:00
Camille GILLOT
9701845287 Do not consider method call receiver as an argument in AST. 2022-08-10 18:34:54 +02:00
Michael Goulet
a2b6744af0 Use &mut Diagnostic instead of &mut DiagnosticBuilder unless needed 2022-08-10 03:45:42 +00:00