- `check-pass` test for a MRE of #135020
- fail test for #135138
- switch to `TooGeneric` for checking CMSE fn signatures
- switch to `TooGeneric` for compute `SizeSkeleton` (for transmute)
- fix broken tests
[AIX] Lint on structs that have a different alignment in AIX's C ABI
This PR adds a linting diagnostic on AIX for repr(C) structs that are required to follow
the power alignment rule. A repr(C) struct needs to follow the power alignment rule if
the struct:
- Has a floating-point data type (greater than 4-bytes) as its first member, or
- The first member of the struct is an aggregate, whose recursively first member is a
floating-point data type (greater than 4-bytes).
The power alignment rule for eligible structs is currently unimplemented, so a linting
diagnostic is produced when such a struct is encountered.
previously field ordering was using the same seed for all instances of Foo,
now we pass seed values through the layout tree so that not only
the struct itself affects layout but also its fields
fix ICE on type error in promoted
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133968
Ensure that when we turn a type error into a "this promoted failed to evaluate" error, we do record this as something that may happen even in "infallible" promoteds.
On nightly, we mention the trait is unstable
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: Unstable` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:13:9
|
LL | foo(t)
| --- ^ the trait `Unstable` is not implemented for `T`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: required by a bound in `foo`
--> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:9:11
|
LL | fn foo<T: Unstable>(_: T) {}
| ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `foo`
help: consider restricting type parameter `T` but it is an `unstable` trait
|
LL | pub fn demo<T: Unstable>(t: T) {
| ++++++++++
```
On stable, we don't suggest the trait at all
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: Unstable` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:13:9
|
LL | foo(t)
| --- ^ the trait `Unstable` is not implemented for `T`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: required by a bound in `foo`
--> $DIR/unstable-trait-suggestion.rs:9:11
|
LL | fn foo<T: Unstable>(_: T) {}
| ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `foo`
```
Add language tests for aggregate types
This adds some tests for struct and union types, ensuring that they satisfy the rules for all structs and unions - namely that fields of structs do not overlap, fields are well-aligned, and the size of the entire.
The reference annotations used are from https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1654, though the rules tested here were FCPed in <https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1152>.
Emit warning when calling/declaring functions with unavailable vectors.
On some architectures, vector types may have a different ABI depending on whether the relevant target features are enabled. (The ABI when the feature is disabled is often not specified, but LLVM implements some de-facto ABI.)
As discussed in rust-lang/lang-team#235, this turns out to very easily lead to unsound code.
This commit makes it a post-monomorphization future-incompat warning to declare or call functions using those vector types in a context in which the corresponding target features are disabled, if using an ABI for which the difference is relevant. This ensures that these functions are always called with a consistent ABI.
See the [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731#issuecomment-2288558187) for more discussion.
Part of #116558
r? RalfJung
Suggest creating unary tuples when types don't match a trait
When you want to have a variadic function, a common workaround to implement this is to create a trait and then implement that trait for various tuples. For example in `pyo3` there exists
```rust
/// Calls the object with only positional arguments.
pub fn call1(&self, args: impl IntoPy<Py<PyTuple>>) -> PyResult<&PyAny> {
...
}
```
with various impls like
```rust
impl<A: IntoPy<PyObject> IntoPy<Py<PyAny>> for (A,)
impl<A: IntoPy<PyObject, B: IntoPy<PyObject> IntoPy<Py<PyAny>> for (A, B)
... etc
```
This means that if you want to call the method with a single item you have to create a unary tuple, like `(x,)`, rather than just `x`.
This PR implements a suggestion to do that, if applicable.
This is consistent with all other diagnostics I could find containing
features and enables the use of `DiagSymbolList` for generalizing
diagnostics for unstable library features to multiple features.
On some architectures, vector types may have a different ABI depending
on whether the relevant target features are enabled. (The ABI when the
feature is disabled is often not specified, but LLVM implements some
de-facto ABI.)
As discussed in rust-lang/lang-team#235, this turns out to very easily
lead to unsound code.
This commit makes it a post-monomorphization future-incompat warning to
declare or call functions using those vector types in a context in which
the corresponding target features are disabled, if using an ABI for
which the difference is relevant. This ensures that these functions are
always called with a consistent ABI.
See the [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731#issuecomment-2288558187)
for more discussion.
Part of #116558
Emit future-incompatibility lint when calling/declaring functions with vectors that require missing target feature
On some architectures, vector types may have a different ABI depending on whether the relevant target features are enabled. (The ABI when the feature is disabled is often not specified, but LLVM implements some de-facto ABI.)
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/235, this turns out to very easily lead to unsound code.
This commit makes it a post-monomorphization error to declare or call functions using those vector types in a context in which the corresponding target features are disabled, if using an ABI for which the difference is relevant. This ensures that these functions are always called with a consistent ABI.
See the [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731#issuecomment-2288558187) for more discussion.
r? RalfJung
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558
On some architectures, vector types may have a different ABI when
relevant target features are enabled.
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/235, this
turns out to very easily lead to unsound code.
This commit makes it an error to declare or call functions using those
vector types in a context in which the corresponding target features are
disabled, if using an ABI for which the difference is relevant.
For structs that cannot be unsized, the layout algorithm sometimes moves
unsized fields to the end of the struct, which circumvented the error
for unexpected unsized fields and returned an unsized layout anyway.
This commit makes it so that the unexpected unsized error is always
returned for structs that cannot be unsized, allowing us to remove an
old hack and fixing some old ICE.
transmute size check: properly account for alignment
Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are...
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101084
