Highlight clarifying information in "expected/found" error
When the expected and found types have the same textual representation, we add clarifying in parentheses. We now visually highlight it in the output.
Detect a corner case where the clarifying information would be the same for both types and skip it, as it doesn't add anything useful.
When the expected and found types have the same textual representation, we add clarifying in parentheses. We now visually highlight it in the output.
Detect a corner case where the clarifying information would be the same for both types and skip it, as it doesn't add anything useful.
Manually walk into WF obligations in `BestObligation` proof tree visitor
When we encounter a `WellFormed` obligation in the `BestObligation` proof tree visitor, ignore the proof tree and call `wf::unnormalized_obligations` to derive well-formed obligations with the correct cause codes. This is to avoid having to replicate the somewhat delicate logic that `wf.rs` does to set up its obligation causes... Don't see a better way to do this.
vibes?? r? lcnr
Compiler: Finalize dyn compatibility renaming
Update the Reference link to use the new URL fragment from https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1666 (this change has finally hit stable). Fixes a FIXME.
Follow-up to #130826.
Part of #130852.
~~Blocking it on #133372.~~ (merged)
r? ghost
Reword resolve errors caused by likely missing crate in dep tree
Reword label and add `help`:
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `some_novel_crate`
--> f704.rs:1:5
|
1 | use some_novel_crate::Type;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `some_novel_crate`
|
= help: if you wanted to use a crate named `some_novel_crate`, use `cargo add some_novel_crate` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
```
Fix#133137.
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `some_novel_crate`
--> file.rs:1:5
|
1 | use some_novel_crate::Type;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `some_novel_crate`
```
On resolve errors where there might be a missing crate, mention `cargo add foo`:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
--> $DIR/conflicting-impl-with-err.rs:4:11
|
LL | impl From<nope::Thing> for Error {
| ^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
|
= help: if you wanted to use a crate named `nope`, use `cargo add nope` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
```
Add missing check for async body when suggesting await on futures.
Currently the compiler suggests adding `.await` to resolve some type conflicts without checking if the conflict happens in an async context. This can lead to the compiler suggesting `.await` in function signatures where it is invalid. Example:
```rs
trait A {
fn a() -> impl Future<Output = ()>;
}
struct B;
impl A for B {
fn a() -> impl Future<Output = impl Future<Output = ()>> {
async { async { () } }
}
}
```
```
error[E0271]: expected `impl Future<Output = impl Future<Output = ()>>` to be a future that resolves to `()`, but it resolves to `impl Future<Output = ()>`
--> bug.rs:6:15
|
6 | fn a() -> impl Future<Output = impl Future<Output = ()>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `()`, found future
|
note: calling an async function returns a future
--> bug.rs:6:15
|
6 | fn a() -> impl Future<Output = impl Future<Output = ()>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `A::{synthetic#0}`
--> bug.rs:2:27
|
2 | fn a() -> impl Future<Output = ()>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `A::{synthetic#0}`
help: consider `await`ing on the `Future`
|
6 | fn a() -> impl Future<Output = impl Future<Output = ()>>.await {
| ++++++
```
The documentation of suggest_await_on_expect_found (`compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/infer/suggest.rs:156`) even mentions such a check but does not actually implement it.
This PR adds that check to ensure `.await` is only suggested within async blocks.
There were 3 unit tests whose expected output needed to be changed because they had the suggestion outside of async. One of them (`tests/ui/async-await/dont-suggest-missing-await.rs`) actually tests that exact problem but expects it to be present.
Thanks to `@llenck` for initially noticing the bug and helping with fixing it
Use `structurally_normalize` instead of manual `normalizes-to` goals in alias relate errors
r? `@lcnr`
I added `structurally_normalize_term` so that code that is generic over ty or const can use the structurally normalize helpers. See `tests/ui/traits/next-solver/diagnostics/alias_relate_error_uses_structurally_normalize.rs` for a description of the reason for the (now fixed) ICEs
This CL makes a number of small changes to dyn compatibility errors:
- "object safety" has been renamed to "dyn-compatibility" throughout
- "Convert to enum" suggestions are no longer generated when there
exists a type-generic impl of the trait or an impl for `dyn OtherTrait`
- Several error messages are reorganized for user readability
Additionally, the dyn compatibility error creation code has been
split out into functions.
cc #132713
cc #133267
Make sure to mark `IMPL_TRAIT_REDUNDANT_CAPTURES` as `Allow` in edition 2024
I never got sign-off on #127672 for this lint being warn by default in edition 2024, so let's turn downgrade this lint to allow for now.
Should be backported so it ships with the edition.
```@rustbot``` label: +beta-nominated
The SCCs of the region graph are not a reliable heuristic to use for blaming an interesting
constraint for diagnostics. For region errors, if the outlived region is `'static`, or the involved
types are invariant in their lifetiems, there will be cycles in the constraint graph containing both
the target region and the most interesting constraints to blame. To get better diagnostics in these
cases, this commit removes that heuristic.
Make `ty::Error` implement all auto traits
I have no idea what's up with the crashes test I fixed--I really don't want to look into it since it has to do something with borrowck and multiple layers of opaques. I think the underlying idea of allowing error types to implement all auto traits is justified though.
Fixes#134796Fixes#131050
r? lcnr
(Re-)Implement `impl_trait_in_bindings`
This reimplements the `impl_trait_in_bindings` feature for local bindings.
"`impl Trait` in bindings" serve as a form of *trait* ascription, where the type basically functions as an infer var but additionally registering the `impl Trait`'s trait bounds for the infer type. These trait bounds can be used to enforce that predicates hold, and can guide inference (e.g. for closure signature inference):
```rust
let _: impl Fn(&u8) -> &u8 = |x| x;
```
They are implemented as an additional set of bounds that are registered when the type is lowered during typeck, and then these bounds are tied to a given `CanonicalUserTypeAscription` for borrowck. We enforce these `CanonicalUserTypeAscription` bounds during borrowck to make sure that the `impl Trait` types are sensitive to lifetimes:
```rust
trait Static: 'static {}
impl<T> Static for T where T: 'static {}
let local = 1;
let x: impl Static = &local;
//~^ ERROR `local` does not live long enough
```
r? oli-obk
cc #63065
---
Why can't we just use TAIT inference or something? Well, TAITs in bodies have the problem that they cannot reference lifetimes local to a body. For example:
```rust
type TAIT = impl Display;
let local = 0;
let x: TAIT = &local;
//~^ ERROR `local` does not live long enough
```
That's because TAITs requires us to do *opaque type inference* which is pretty strict, since we need to remap all of the lifetimes of the hidden type to universal regions. This is simply not possible here.
---
I consider this part of the "impl trait everywhere" experiment. I'm not certain if this needs yet another lang team experiment.
Tweak multispan rendering to reduce output length
Consider comments and bare delimiters the same as an "empty line" for purposes of hiding rendered code output of long multispans. This results in more aggressive shortening of rendered output without losing too much context, specially in `*.stderr` tests that have "hidden" comments. We do that check not only on the first 4 lines of the multispan, but now also on the previous to last line as well.
Consider comments and bare delimiters the same as an "empty line" for purposes of hiding rendered code output of long multispans. This results in more aggressive shortening of rendered output without losing too much context, specially in `*.stderr` tests that have "hidden" comments.
Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait)
This allows us to begin messing around `async fn` in `dyn Trait`. Calling an async fn from a trait object always returns a `dyn* Future<Output = ...>`.
To make it work, Implementations are currently required to return something that can be coerced to a `dyn* Future` (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/works.rs`). If it's not the right size, then it'll raise an error at the coercion site (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/wrong-size.rs`). Currently the only practical way of doing this is wrapping the body in `Box::pin(async move { .. })`.
This PR does not implement a helper type like a "`Boxing`"[^boxing] adapter, and I'll probably follow-up with another PR to improve the error message for the `PointerLike` trait (something that explains in just normal prose what is happening here, rather than a trait error).
[^boxing]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-fundamentals-initiative/explainer/user_guide_future.html#the-boxing-adapter
This PR also does not implement new trait solver support for AFIDT; I'll need to think how best to integrate it into candidate assembly, and that's a bit of a matter of taste, but I don't think it will be difficult to do.
This could also be generalized:
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Future` (soon).
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Iterator` and other "dyn rpitit safe" traits. We still need to nail down exactly what is needed for this to be okay (not soon).
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133119
Rudimentary heuristic to insert parentheses when needed for RPIT overcaptures lint
We don't have basically any preexisting machinery to detect when parentheses are needed for *types*. AFAICT, all of the diagnostics we have for opaques just... fail when they suggest `+ 'a` when that's ambiguous.
Fixes#132853
Gate async fn trait bound modifier on `async_trait_bounds`
This PR moves `async Fn()` trait bounds into a new feature gate: `feature(async_trait_bounds)`. The general vibe is that we will most likely stabilize the `feature(async_closure)` *without* the `async Fn()` trait bound modifier, so we need to gate that separately.
We're trying to work on the general vision of `async` trait bound modifier general in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710, however that RFC still needs more time for consensus to converge, and we've decided that the value that users get from calling the bound `async Fn()` is *not really* worth blocking landing async closures in general.
