Add a conversion from `&mut T` to `&mut UnsafeCell<T>`
Provides a safe way of downgrading an exclusive reference into an alias-able `&UnsafeCell<T>` reference.
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/198.
debug format `Const`'s less verbosely
Not user visible change only visible to people debugging const generics.
Currently debug output for `ty::Const` is super verbose (even for `-Zverbose` lol), things like printing infer vars as `Infer(Var(?0c))` instead of just `?0c`, bound vars and placeholders not using `^0_1` or `!0_1` syntax respectively. With these changes its imo better but not perfect:
`Const { ty: usize, kind: ^0_1 }`
is still a lot for not much information. not entirely sure what to do about that so not dealing with it yet.
Need to do formatting for `ConstKind::Expr` at some point too since rn it sucks (doesn't even print anything with `Display`) not gonna do that in this PR either.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107680 (Hide repr attribute from doc of types without guaranteed repr)
- #111488 (Use error term in projection if missing associated item in new solver)
- #111533 (Handle error body in generator layout)
- #111573 (Erase `ReError` properly)
- #111592 (Change Vec examples to not assert exact capacity except where it is guaranteed)
- #111610 (fix(diagnostic): wrap parens for ref impl trait param)
- #111642 ([rustdoc] Only keep impl blocks from bodies)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix(diagnostic): wrap parens for ref impl trait param
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99597
When parameters are an `impl_trait` which it needed to add trait, and it is a reference, add parentheses to the type of the parameter in the suggestion
Erase `ReError` properly
Fixes#111341
Since we check whether a type has free regions before erasing (to short circuit unnecesary folding), we need to consider `ReError` as a free region, or else we'll skip it when erasing a type that only mentions `ReError`.
cc `@nnethercote`
Handle error body in generator layout
Fixes#111468
I feel like making this query return `Option<GeneratorLayout>` might be better but had some issues with that approach
Always fall back to PartialEq when a constant in a pattern is not recursively structural-eq
Right now we destructure the constant as far as we can, but with this PR we just don't take it apart anymore. This is preparatory work for moving to always using valtrees, as these will just do a single conversion of the constant to a valtree at the start, and if that fails, fall back to `PartialEq`.
This removes a few cases where we emitted the `unreachable pattern` lint, because we stop looking into the constant deeply enough to detect that a constant is already covered by another pattern.
Previous work: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70743
This is groundwork towards fixing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83085 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105047
Suppress "erroneous constant used" for constants tainted by errors
When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
Fixes#110891.
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items.
I encountered #111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition.
I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
Recover `impl<T ?Sized>` correctly
Fixes#111327
r? ````@Nilstrieb```` but you can re-roll
Alternatively, happy to close this if we're okay with just saying "sorry #111327 is just a poor side-effect of parser ambiguity" 🤷
Combine three generalizer implementations
Fixes#111092Fixes#109505
This code is a bit delicate and there were subtle changes between them, so I'll leave inline comments where further inspection is needed.
Regarding this comment from #109813 -- "add tests triggering all codepaths: at least the combine and the const generalizer", can't really do that now, and I don't really know how we'd get a higher-ranked const error since non-lifetime binders doesn't *really* support `for<const ..>` (it errors out when you try to use it).
r? `@lcnr`
Remove misleading target feature aliases
Fixes#100752. This is a follow up to #103750. These aliases could not be completely removed until rust-lang/stdarch#1355 landed.
cc `@Amanieu`