We do not coerce `&mut &mut T -> *mut mut T`
Resolves#34117 by declaring it to be "working as intended" until someone RFCs it or whatever other lang proposal would be required. It seems a bit of a footgun, but perhaps there are strong reasons to allow it anyways. Seeing as how I often have to be mindful to not allow a pointer to coerce the wrong way in my FFI work, I am inclined to think not, but perhaps it's fine in some use-case and that's actually more common?
Enable `--check-cfg` by default in UI tests
This PR enables-by-default `--check-cfg` in UI tests, now that it has become stable.
To do so this PR does 2 main things:
- it introduce the `no-auto-check-cfg` directive to `compiletest`, to prevent any `--check-cfg` args (only to be used for `--check-cfg` tests)
- it updates the _remaining_[^1] UI tests by either:
- allowing the lint when neither expecting the lint nor giving the check-cfg args make sense
- give the appropriate check-cfg args
- or expect the lint, when it useful
[^1]: some preparation work was done in #123577#123702
I highly recommend reviewing this PR commit-by-commit.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Change `SIGPIPE` ui from `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` to `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`
In the stabilization [attempt](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832) of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern was [raised ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-2007394609) related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes awkward.
So as a first step towards the next stabilization attempt, this PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was [also raised](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-1987023484), namely that the ui should not leak **how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be iterated on further before stabilization.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
Use a proof tree visitor to refine the `Obligation` for error reporting in new solver
With the magic of `ProofTreeVisitor`, we can close the gap that we have on `ObligationCause`s being not as descriptive in the new trait solver.
r? lcnr
Needs some work and obviously documentation.
Some hir cleanups
It seemed odd to not put `AnonConst` in the arena, compared with the other types that we did put into an arena. This way we can also give it a `Span` without growing a lot of other HIR data structures because of the extra field.
r? compiler
In the stabilization attempt of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern
was raised related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long
term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just
libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes
awkward.
So as a first step towards towards the next stabilization attempt, this
PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag
`-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language
is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was also raised, namely that the ui should not leak
**how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new
flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be
iterated on further before stabilization.
Use an explicit x86-64 cpu in tests that are sensitive to it
There are a few tests that depend on some target features **not** being
enabled by default, and usually they are correct with the default x86-64
target CPU. However, in downstream builds we have modified the default
to fit our distros -- `x86-64-v2` in RHEL 9 and `x86-64-v3` in RHEL 10
-- and the latter especially trips tests that expect not to have AVX.
These cases are few enough that we can just set them back explicitly.
Add a lint against never type fallback affecting unsafe code
~~I'm not very happy with the code quality... `VecGraph` not allowing you to get predecessors is very annoying. This should work though, so there is that.~~ (ended up updating `VecGraph` to support getting predecessors)
~~First few commits are from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123934https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123980~~
Rewrite select (in the new solver) to use a `ProofTreeVisitor`
We can use a proof tree visitor rather than collecting and recomputing all the nested goals ourselves.
Based on #124415
There are a few tests that depend on some target features **not** being
enabled by default, and usually they are correct with the default x86-64
target CPU. However, in downstream builds we have modified the default
to fit our distros -- `x86-64-v2` in RHEL 9 and `x86-64-v3` in RHEL 10
-- and the latter especially trips tests that expect not to have AVX.
These cases are few enough that we can just set them back explicitly.
Cleanup: Replace item names referencing GitHub issues or error codes with something more meaningful
**lcnr** in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117164#pullrequestreview-1969935387:
> […] while I know that there's precendent to name things `Issue69420`, I really dislike this as it requires looking up the issue to figure out the purpose of such a variant. Actually referring to the underlying issue, e.g. `AliasMayNormToUncovered` or whatever and then linking to the issue in a doc comment feels a lot more desirable to me. We should ideally rename all the functions and enums which currently use issue numbers.
I've grepped through `compiler/` like crazy and think that I've found all instances of this pattern.
However, I haven't renamed `compute_2229_migrations_*`. Should I?
The first commit introduces an abhorrent and super long name for an item because naming is hard but also scary looking / unwelcoming names are good for things related to temporary-ish backcompat hacks. I'll let you discover it by yourself.
Contains a bit of drive-by cleanup and a diag migration bc that was the simplest option.
r? lcnr or compiler
Lazily normalize inside trait ref during orphan check & consider ty params in rigid alias types to be uncovered
Fixes#99554, fixesrust-lang/types-team#104.
Fixes#114061.
Supersedes #100555.
Tracking issue for the future compatibility lint: #124559.
r? lcnr
and replace it with a simple note suggesting
returning a value.
The type mismatch error was never due to
how many times the loop iterates. It is more
because of the peculiar structure of what the for
loop desugars to. So the note talking about
iteration count didn't make sense
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #124519 (adapt a codegen test for llvm 19)
- #124524 (Add StaticForeignItem and use it on ForeignItemKind)
- #124540 (Give proof tree visitors the ability to instantiate nested goals directly)
- #124543 (codegen tests: Tolerate `range()` qualifications in enum tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add StaticForeignItem and use it on ForeignItemKind
This is in preparation for unsafe extern blocks that adds a safe variant for functions inside extern blocks.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@compiler-errors`
coverage: Replace boolean options with a `CoverageLevel` enum
After #123409, and some discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79649#issuecomment-2042093553 and #124120, it became clear to me that we should have a unified concept of “coverage level”, instead of having several separate boolean flags that aren't actually independent.
This PR therefore introduces a `CoverageLevel` enum, to replace the existing boolean flags for `branch` and `mcdc`.
The `no-branch` value (for `-Zcoverage-options`) has been renamed to `block`, instructing the compiler to only instrument for block coverage, with no branch coverage or MD/DC instrumentation.
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
cc `@ZhuUx` `@Lambdaris` `@RenjiSann`
Add a note to the ArbitraryExpressionInPattern error
The current "arbitrary expressions aren't allowed in patterns" error is confusing, as it fires for code where it *looks* like a pattern but the compiler still treats it as an expression. That this is due to the `:expr` fragment specifier forcing the expression-ness property on the code.
In the test suite, the "arbitrary expressions aren't allowed in patterns" error can only be found in combination with macro_rules macros that force expression-ness of their content, namely via `:expr` metavariables. I also can't come up with cases where there would be an expression instead of a pattern, so I think it's always coming from an `:expr`.
In order to make the error less confusing, this adds a note explaining the weird `:expr` fragment behaviour.
Fixes#99380
[Refactor] Rename `Lint` and `LintGroup`'s `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded`
The field being named `is_loaded` was very confusing. Turns out it's true for lints that are registered by external tools like Clippy (I had to look at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116412 to know what the variable meant). So I renamed `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded` and added some docs.
Mark unions non-const-propagatable in `KnownPanicsLint` without calling layout
Fixes#123710
The ICE occurs during the layout calculation of the union `InvalidTag` in #123710 because the following assert fails:5fe8b697e7/compiler/rustc_abi/src/layout.rs (L289-L292)
The layout calculation is invoked by `KnownPanicsLint` when it is trying to figure out which locals it can const prop. Since `KnownPanicsLint` is never actually going to const props unions thanks to PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121628 there's no point calling layout to check if it can. So in this fix I skip the call to layout and just mark the local non-const propagatable if it is a union.
Fix#124478 - offset_of! returns a temporary
This was due to the must_use() call. Adding HIR's `OffsetOf` to the must_use checking within the compiler avoids this issue while maintaining the lint output.
Fixes#124478. `@tgross35`
Do not ICE on invalid consts when walking mono-reachable blocks
The `bug!` here was written under the logic of "this condition is impossible, right?" except that of course, if the compiler is given code that results in an compile error, then the situation is possible.
So now we just direct errors into the already-existing path for when we can't do a mono-time optimization.
Fix ICE on invalid const param types
Fixes ICE #123863 which occurs because the const param has a type which is not a `bool`, `char` or an integral type.
The ICEing code path begins here in `typeck_with_fallback`: cb3752d20e/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/lib.rs (L167)
The `fallback` invokes the `type_of` query and that eventually ends up calling `ct_infer` from the lowering code over here:
cb3752d20e/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/hir_ty_lowering/mod.rs (L561) and `ct_infer` ICEs at this location: cb3752d20e/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect.rs (L392)
To fix the ICE it I'm triggering a `span_delayed_bug` before we hit `ct_infer` if the type of the const param is not one of the supported types
### Edit
On `@lcnr's` suggestion I've changed the approach to not let `ReStatic` region hit the `bug!` in `ct_infer` instead of triggering a `span_delayed_bug`.
Fix substitution parts having a shifted underline in some cases
If two suggestions parts are side by side, the underline's offset:
(WIP PR as an example, not yet pushed)
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> ./main.rs:4:9
|
4 | 1 + 2 => 3
| ^^^^^ arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns
|
help: check the value in an arm guard
|
4 | n if n == 1 + 2 => 3
| ~ +++++++++++++
```
The emitter didn't take into account that the string had shrunk/grown if two substitution parts were side-by-side (surprisingly, there was only one case in the ui testsuite.)
```
help: check the value in an arm guard
|
4 | n if n == 1 + 2 => 3
| ~ +++++++++++++
```
``@rustbot`` label +A-suggestion-diagnostics
ast: Generalize item kind visiting
And avoid duplicating logic for visiting `Item`s with different kinds (regular, associated, foreign).
The diff is better viewed with whitespace ignored.
`obligations_for_self_ty`: use `ProofTreeVisitor` for nested goals
As always, dealing with proof trees continues to be a hacked together mess. After this PR and #124380 the only remaining blocker for core is https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/90. There is also a `ProofTreeVisitor` issue causing an ICE when compiling `alloc` which I will handle in a separate PR. This issue likely affects coherence diagnostics more generally.
The core idea is to extend the proof tree visitor to support visiting nested candidates without using a `probe`. We then simply recurse into nested candidates if they are the only potentially applicable candidate for a given goal and check whether the self type matches the expected one.
For that to work, we need to improve `CanonicalState` to also handle unconstrained inference variables created inside of the trait solver. This is done by extending the `var_values` of `CanoncalState` with each fresh inference variables. Furthermore, we also store the state of all inference variables at the end of each probe. When recursing into `InspectCandidates` we then unify the values of all these states.
r? `@compiler-errors`
uses a `ProofTreeVisitor` to look into nested
goals when looking at the pending obligations
during hir typeck. Used by closure signature
inference, coercion, and for async functions.
`-Z debug-macros` is "stabilized" by enabling it by default and removing.
`-Z collapse-macro-debuginfo` is stabilized as `-C collapse-macro-debuginfo`.
It now supports all typical boolean values (`parse_opt_bool`) in addition to just yes/no.
Default value of `collapse_debuginfo` was changed from `false` to `external` (i.e. collapsed if external, not collapsed if local).
`#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute without a value is no longer supported to avoid guessing the default.
Don't ICE when `codegen_select_candidate` returns ambiguity in new solver
Because we merge identical candidates, we may have >1 impl candidate to in `codegen_select_error` but *not* have a trait error.
r? lcnr
Detect borrow error involving sub-slices and suggest `split_at_mut`
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo` as mutable more than once at a time
--> $DIR/suggest-split-at-mut.rs:13:18
|
LL | let a = &mut foo[..2];
| --- first mutable borrow occurs here
LL | let b = &mut foo[2..];
| ^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
LL | a[0] = 5;
| ---- first borrow later used here
|
= help: use `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
Address most of #58792.
For follow up work, we should emit a structured suggestion for cases where we can identify the exact `let (a, b) = foo.split_at_mut(2);` call that is needed.
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo` as mutable more than once at a time
--> $DIR/suggest-split-at-mut.rs:13:18
|
LL | let a = &mut foo[..2];
| --- first mutable borrow occurs here
LL | let b = &mut foo[2..];
| ^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
LL | a[0] = 5;
| ---- first borrow later used here
|
= help: use `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
Address most of #58792.
For follow up work, we should emit a structured suggestion for cases where we can identify the exact `let (a, b) = foo.split_at_mut(2);` call that is needed.
Enforce closure args + return type are WF
I found this out when investigating https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123461#issuecomment-2040894359. Turns out we don't register WF obligations for closure args and return types, leading to the ICE.
~~I think this is a useful thing to check for, but I'd like to check what the fallout is.~~ crater is complete.
~~Worst case, I think we should enforce this across an edition boundary (and possibly eventually migrate this for all editions) -- this should be super easy to do, since this is a check in HIR wfcheck, so it can be made edition dependent.~~ I believe the regressions are manageable enough to not necessitate edition-specific behavior.
Fixes#123461
Provide more context and suggestions in borrowck errors involving closures
Start pointing to where bindings where declared when they are captured in closures:
```
error[E0597]: `x` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/suggest-return-closure.rs:23:9
|
LL | let x = String::new();
| - binding `x` declared here
...
LL | |c| {
| --- value captured here
LL | x.push(c);
| ^ borrowed value does not live long enough
...
LL | }
| -- borrow later used here
| |
| `x` dropped here while still borrowed
```
Suggest cloning in more cases involving closures:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo` in pattern guard
--> $DIR/issue-27282-move-ref-mut-into-guard.rs:11:19
|
LL | if { (|| { let mut bar = foo; bar.take() })(); false } => {},
| ^^ --- move occurs because `foo` has type `&mut Option<&i32>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| |
| `foo` is moved here
|
= note: variables bound in patterns cannot be moved from until after the end of the pattern guard
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | if { (|| { let mut bar = foo.clone(); bar.take() })(); false } => {},
| ++++++++
```
Mention when type parameter could be Clone
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
--> $DIR/use_of_moved_value_copy_suggestions.rs:7:9
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| - move occurs because `t` has type `T`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
...
LL | (t, t)
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
help: if `T` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> $DIR/use_of_moved_value_copy_suggestions.rs:4:16
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| ^ consider constraining this type parameter with `Clone`
...
LL | (t, t)
| - you could clone this value
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T: Copy>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| ++++++
```
The `help` is new. On ADTs, we also extend the output with span labels:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of static item `FOO`
--> $DIR/issue-17718-static-move.rs:6:14
|
LL | let _a = FOO;
| ^^^ move occurs because `FOO` has type `Foo`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: if `Foo` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> $DIR/issue-17718-static-move.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ consider implementing `Clone` for this type
...
LL | let _a = FOO;
| --- you could clone this value
help: consider borrowing here
|
LL | let _a = &FOO;
| +
```
Suggest cloning captured binding in move closure
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `bar`, a captured variable in an `FnMut` closure
--> $DIR/borrowck-move-by-capture.rs:9:29
|
LL | let bar: Box<_> = Box::new(3);
| --- captured outer variable
LL | let _g = to_fn_mut(|| {
| -- captured by this `FnMut` closure
LL | let _h = to_fn_once(move || -> isize { *bar });
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----
| | |
| | variable moved due to use in closure
| | move occurs because `bar` has type `Box<isize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| `bar` is moved here
|
help: clone the value before moving it into the closure 1
|
LL ~ let value = bar.clone();
LL ~ let _h = to_fn_once(move || -> isize { value });
|
```
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `bar`, a captured variable in an `FnMut` closure
--> $DIR/borrowck-move-by-capture.rs:9:29
|
LL | let bar: Box<_> = Box::new(3);
| --- captured outer variable
LL | let _g = to_fn_mut(|| {
| -- captured by this `FnMut` closure
LL | let _h = to_fn_once(move || -> isize { *bar });
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----
| | |
| | variable moved due to use in closure
| | move occurs because `bar` has type `Box<isize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| `bar` is moved here
|
help: clone the value before moving it into the closure
|
LL ~ let value = bar.clone();
LL ~ let _h = to_fn_once(move || -> isize { value });
|
```
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
--> $DIR/use_of_moved_value_copy_suggestions.rs:7:9
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| - move occurs because `t` has type `T`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
...
LL | (t, t)
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
help: if `T` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> $DIR/use_of_moved_value_copy_suggestions.rs:4:16
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| ^ consider constraining this type parameter with `Clone`
...
LL | (t, t)
| - you could clone this value
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
LL | fn duplicate_t<T: Copy>(t: T) -> (T, T) {
| ++++++
```
The `help` is new. On ADTs, we also extend the output with span labels:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of static item `FOO`
--> $DIR/issue-17718-static-move.rs:6:14
|
LL | let _a = FOO;
| ^^^ move occurs because `FOO` has type `Foo`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: if `Foo` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value
--> $DIR/issue-17718-static-move.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^ consider implementing `Clone` for this type
...
LL | let _a = FOO;
| --- you could clone this value
help: consider borrowing here
|
LL | let _a = &FOO;
| +
```
Start pointing to where bindings were declared when they are captured in closures:
```
error[E0597]: `x` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/suggest-return-closure.rs:23:9
|
LL | let x = String::new();
| - binding `x` declared here
...
LL | |c| {
| --- value captured here
LL | x.push(c);
| ^ borrowed value does not live long enough
...
LL | }
| -- borrow later used here
| |
| `x` dropped here while still borrowed
```
Suggest cloning in more cases involving closures:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `foo` in pattern guard
--> $DIR/issue-27282-move-ref-mut-into-guard.rs:11:19
|
LL | if { (|| { let mut bar = foo; bar.take() })(); false } => {},
| ^^ --- move occurs because `foo` has type `&mut Option<&i32>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
| |
| `foo` is moved here
|
= note: variables bound in patterns cannot be moved from until after the end of the pattern guard
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | if { (|| { let mut bar = foo.clone(); bar.take() })(); false } => {},
| ++++++++
```
Improve diagnostic for unknown `--print` request
This PR improves the diagnostic when encountering a unknown `--print` request.
It also moves the run-make test to a simple UI test.
Stabilise inline_const
# Stabilisation Report
## Summary
This PR will stabilise `inline_const` feature in expression position. `inline_const_pat` is still unstable and will *not* be stabilised.
The feature will allow code like this:
```rust
foo(const { 1 + 1 })
```
which is roughly desugared into
```rust
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
const FOO: i32 = 1 + 1;
}
foo(Foo::FOO)
```
This feature is from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2920 and is tracked in #76001 (the tracking issue should *not* be closed as it needs to track inline const in pattern position). The initial implementation is done in #77124.
## Difference from RFC
There are two major differences (enhancements) as implemented from the RFC. First thing is that the RFC says that the type of an inline const block inferred from the content *within* it, but we currently can infer the type using the information from outside the const block as well. This is a frequently requested feature to the initial implementation (e.g. #89964). The inference is implemented in #89561 and is done by treating inline const similar to a closure and therefore share inference context with its parent body.
This allows code like:
```rust
let v: Vec<i32> = const { Vec::new() };
```
Another enhancement that differs from the RFC is that we currently allow inline consts to reference generic parameters. This is implemented in #96557.
This allows code like:
```rust
fn create_none_array<T, const N: usize>() -> [Option<T>; N] {
[const { None::<T> }; N]
}
```
This enhancement also makes inline const usable as static asserts:
```rust
fn require_zst<T>() {
const { assert!(std::mem::size_of::<T>() == 0) }
}
```
## Documentation
Reference: rust-lang/reference#1295
## Unresolved issues
We still have a few issues that are not resolved, but I don't think it necessarily has to block stabilisation:
* expr fragment specifier issue: #86730
* ~~`const {}` behaves similar to `async {}` but not to `{}` and `unsafe {}` (they are treated as `ExpressionWithoutBlock` rather than `ExpressionWithBlock`): https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/const.20blocks.20differ.20from.20normal.20and.20from.20unsafe.20blocks/near/290229453~~
## Tests
There are a few tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/inline-const
More DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes
This accepts more code on stable. It is now possible to have match arms return a function item `foo::<ConcreteType>` and a function item `foo::<OpaqueTypeInDefiningScope>` in another, and that will constrain `OpaqueTypeInDefiningScope` to have the hidden type `ConcreteType`. So the following function will now compile, but on master it errors with a type mismatch on the second match arm
```rust
// The function item whose generic params we want to merge.
fn foo<T>(t: T) -> T { t }
// Helper ensuring we can constrain `T` on `F` without explicitly specifying it
fn bind<T, F: FnOnce(T) -> T>(_: T, f: F) -> F { f }
fn k() -> impl Sized {
let x = match true {
true => {
// `f` is `FnDef(foo, [infer_var])`
let f = foo;
// Get a value of an opaque type on stable
let t = k();
// this returns `FnDef(foo, [k::return])`
bind(t, f)
}
false => foo::<()>,
};
todo!()
}
```
r? ``@compiler-errors``
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116652
Test `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]` with both `SIG_DFL` and `SIG_IGN`
Extend our `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]` test so that it detects if `SIGPIPE` wrongly ends up being `SIG_DFL` when the parent has `SIG_IGN`. We have no current test for this particular case.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
delegation: Support renaming, and async, const, extern "ABI" and C-variadic functions
Also allow delegating to functions with opaque types (`impl Trait`).
The delegation item will refer to the original opaque type from the callee, fresh opaque type won't be created, which seems like a reasonable behavior.
(Such delegation items will cause query cycles when used in trait impls, but it can be fixed later.)
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118212.
Couldn't find documentation supporting that single-variant
`#[repr(Rust)]` enums with RHS assigned work as expected with this
change.
```rust
enum Variants {
A = 17,
} // Would this be zero sized optimized guaranteed?
```
Also allow `impl Trait` in delegated functions.
The delegation item will refer to the original opaque type from the callee, fresh opaque type won't be created.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #124003 (Dellvmize some intrinsics (use `u32` instead of `Self` in some integer intrinsics))
- #124169 (Don't fatal when calling `expect_one_of` when recovering arg in `parse_seq`)
- #124286 (Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't fatal when calling `expect_one_of` when recovering arg in `parse_seq`
In `parse_seq`, when parsing a sequence of token-separated items, if we don't see a separator, we try to parse another item eagerly in order to give a good diagnostic and recover from a missing separator:
d1a0fa5ed3/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs (L900-L901)
If parsing the item itself calls `expect_one_of`, then we will fatal because of #58903:
d1a0fa5ed3/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs (L513-L516)
For `precise_capturing` feature I implemented, we do end up calling `expected_one_of`:
d1a0fa5ed3/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/ty.rs (L712-L714)
This leads the compiler to fatal *before* having emitted the first error, leading to absolutely no useful information for the user about what happened in the parser.
This PR makes it so that we stop doing that.
Fixes#124195
Dellvmize some intrinsics (use `u32` instead of `Self` in some integer intrinsics)
This implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/693 minus what was implemented in #123226.
Note: I decided to _not_ change `shl`/... builder methods, as it just doesn't seem worth it.
r? ``@scottmcm``
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120929 (Wrap dyn type with parentheses in suggestion)
- #122591 (Suggest using type args directly instead of equality constraint)
- #122598 (deref patterns: lower deref patterns to MIR)
- #123048 (alloc::Layout: explicitly document size invariant on the type level)
- #123993 (Do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root)
- #124218 (Allow nesting subdiagnostics in #[derive(Subdiagnostic)])
- #124285 (Mark ``@RUSTC_BUILTIN`` search path usage as unstable)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root
We only need to do `check_coroutine_obligations` once per typeck root, especially since the new solver can't really (easily) associate which obligations correspond to which coroutines.
This requires us to move the checks for sized coroutine fields into `mir_coroutine_witnesses`, but that's fine imo.
r? lcnr
deref patterns: lower deref patterns to MIR
This lowers deref patterns to MIR. This is a bit tricky because this is the first kind of pattern that requires storing a value in a temporary. Thanks to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123324 false edges are no longer a problem.
The thing I'm not confident about is the handling of fake borrows. This PR ignores any fake borrows inside a deref pattern. We are guaranteed to at least fake borrow the place of the first pointer value, which could be enough, but I'm not certain.
Suggest using type args directly instead of equality constraint
When type arguments are written erroneously using an equality constraint we suggest specifying them directly without the equality constraint.
Fixes#122162
Changes the diagnostic in the issue from:
```rust
error[E0229]: associated type bindings are not allowed here
9 | impl std::cmp::PartialEq<Rhs = T> for S {
| ^^^^^^^ associated type not allowed here
|
```
to
```rust
error[E0229]: associated type bindings are not allowed here
9 | impl std::cmp::PartialEq<Rhs = T> for S {
| ^^^^^^^ associated type not allowed here
|
help: to use `T` as a generic argument specify it directly
|
| impl std::cmp::PartialEq<T> for S {
| ~
```
Use fulfillment in method probe, not evaluation
This PR reworks method probing to use fulfillment instead of a `for`-loop of `evaluate_predicate` calls, and moves normalization from method candidate assembly into the `consider_probe`, where it's applied to *all* candidates. This last part coincidentally fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121643#issuecomment-1975371248.
Regarding *why* this large rewrite is done: In general, it's an anti-pattern to do `for o in obligations { evaluate(o); }` because it's not compatible with the way that the new solver emits alias-relate obligations which constrain variables that may show up in other predicates.
r? lcnr
Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions
This implements the suggestion in [#15701](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701#issuecomment-2033124217) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
weak lang items are not allowed to be #[track_caller]
For instance the panic handler will be called via this import
```rust
extern "Rust" {
#[lang = "panic_impl"]
fn panic_impl(pi: &PanicInfo<'_>) -> !;
}
```
A `#[track_caller]` would add an extra argument and thus make this the wrong signature.
The 2nd commit is a consistency rename; based on the docs [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/unstable-book/language-features/lang-items.html) and [here](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/lang-items.html) I figured "lang item" is more widely used. (In the compiler output, "lang item" and "language item" seem to be pretty even.)
Improve handling of expr->field errors
The current message for "`->` used for field access" is the following:
```rust
error: expected one of `!`, `.`, `::`, `;`, `?`, `{`, `}`, or an operator, found `->`
--> src/main.rs:2:6
|
2 | a->b;
| ^^ expected one of 8 possible tokens
```
([playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=7f8b6f4433aa7866124123575456f54e))
This PR tries to address this by adding a dedicated error message and recovery. The proposed error message is:
```
error: `->` used for field access or method call
--> ./tiny_test.rs:2:6
|
2 | a->b;
| ^^ help: try using `.` instead
|
= help: the `.` operator will dereference the value if needed
```
(feel free to bikeshed it as much as necessary)
Deny gen keyword in `edition_2024_compat` lints
Splits the `keyword_idents` lint into two -- `keyword_idents_2018` and `keyword_idents_2024` -- since each corresponds to a future-compat warning in a different edition. Group these together into a new `keyword_idents` lint group, and add the latter to the `rust_2024_compatibility` so that `gen` is ready for the 2024 edition.
cc `@traviscross` `@ehuss`
Add simple async drop glue generation
This is a prototype of the async drop glue generation for some simple types. Async drop glue is intended to behave very similar to the regular drop glue except for being asynchronous. Currently it does not execute synchronous drops but only calls user implementations of `AsyncDrop::async_drop` associative function and awaits the returned future. It is not complete as it only recurses into arrays, slices, tuples, and structs and does not have same sensible restrictions as the old `Drop` trait implementation like having the same bounds as the type definition, while code assumes their existence (requires a future work).
This current design uses a workaround as it does not create any custom async destructor state machine types for ADTs, but instead uses types defined in the std library called future combinators (deferred_async_drop, chain, ready_unit).
Also I recommend reading my [explainer](https://zetanumbers.github.io/book/async-drop-design.html).
This is a part of the [MCP: Low level components for async drop](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/727) work.
Feature completeness:
- [x] `AsyncDrop` trait
- [ ] `async_drop_in_place_raw`/async drop glue generation support for
- [x] Trivially destructible types (integers, bools, floats, string slices, pointers, references, etc.)
- [x] Arrays and slices (array pointer is unsized into slice pointer)
- [x] ADTs (enums, structs, unions)
- [x] tuple-like types (tuples, closures)
- [ ] Dynamic types (`dyn Trait`, see explainer's [proposed design](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#async-drop-glue-for-dyn-trait))
- [ ] coroutines (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123948)
- [x] Async drop glue includes sync drop glue code
- [x] Cleanup branch generation for `async_drop_in_place_raw`
- [ ] Union rejects non-trivially async destructible fields
- [ ] `AsyncDrop` implementation requires same bounds as type definition
- [ ] Skip trivially destructible fields (optimization)
- [ ] New [`TyKind::AdtAsyncDestructor`](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#adt-async-destructor-types) and get rid of combinators
- [ ] [Synchronously undroppable types](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#exclusively-async-drop)
- [ ] Automatic async drop at the end of the scope in async context
The current message for "`->` used for field access" is the following:
```rust
error: expected one of `!`, `.`, `::`, `;`, `?`, `{`, `}`, or an operator, found `->`
--> src/main.rs:2:6
|
2 | a->b;
| ^^ expected one of 8 possible tokens
```
(playground link[1])
This PR tries to address this by adding a dedicated error message and recovery. The proposed error message is:
```
error: `->` used for field access or method call
--> ./tiny_test.rs:2:6
|
2 | a->b;
| ^^ help: try using `.` instead
|
= help: the `.` operator will dereference the value if needed
```
(feel free to bikeshed it as much as necessary)
[1]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=7f8b6f4433aa7866124123575456f54e
Signed-off-by: Sasha Pourcelot <sasha.pourcelot@protonmail.com>
Ignore `-C strip` on MSVC
tl;dr - Define `-Cstrip` to only ever affect the binary; no other build artifacts.
This is necessary to improve cross-platform behavior consistency: if someone wanted debug information to be contained only in separate files on all platforms, they would set `-Cstrip=symbols` and `-Csplit-debuginfo=packed`, but this would result in no PDB files on MSVC.
Resolves#114215
