Feature: Add assist to unwrap tuple declarations
> Implement #12923 for only tuples.
>
> Does not implement unwrapping for structs, as mentioned in the issue.
Add assist to unwrap tuples declarations to separate declarations.
```rust
fn main() {
$0let (foo, bar, baz) = (1.0, "example", String::new())
}
```
becomes:
```rust
fn main() {
let foo = 1.0;
let bar = "example";
let baz = String::new();
}
```
## Changelog
### Feature
- Added assist to unwrap tuple declarations.
feat: type inference for generators
This PR implements basic type inference for generator and yield expressions.
Things not included in this PR:
- Generator upvars and generator witnesses are not implemented. They are only used to determine auto trait impls, so basic type inference should be fine without them, but method resolutions with auto trait bounds may not be resolved correctly.
Open questions:
- I haven't (yet) implemented `HirDisplay` for `TyKind::Generator`, so generator types are just shown as "{{generator}}" (in tests, inlay hints, hovers, etc.), which is not really nice. How should we show them?
- I added moderate amount of stuffs to minicore. I especially didn't want to add `impl<T> Deref for &T` and `impl<T> Deref for &mut T` exclusively for tests for generators; should I move them into the test fixtures or can they be placed in minicore?
cc #4309
Don't run proc-macro-srv tests on the rust-analyzer repo
proc-macro ABI breakage still affects the tests when a new stable version releases. Ideally we'd still be able to run the tests on the rust-analyzer repo without having to update the proc-macro ABI, but for now just to unblock CI we will ignore them here, as they are still run in upstream.
proc-macro ABI breakage still affects the tests when a new stable version
releases. Ideally we'd still be able to run the tests on the rust-analyzer
repo without having to update the proc-macro ABI, but for now just to
unblock CI we will ignore them here, as they are still run in upstream.
feat: Display the value of enum variant on hover
fixes#12955
This PR adds const eval support for enums, as well as showing their value on hover, just as consts currently have.
I developed these two things at the same time, but I've realized now that they are separate. However since the hover is just a 10 line change (not including tests), I figured I may as well put them in the same PR. Though if you want them split up into "enum const eval support" and "show enum variant value on hover", I think that's reasonable too.
Since this adds const eval support for enums this also allows consts that reference enums to have their values computed now too.
The const evaluation itself is quite rudimentary, it doesn't keep track of the actual type of the enum, but it turns out that Rust doesn't actually either, and `E::A as u8` is valid regardless of the `repr` on `E`.
It also doesn't really care about what expression the enum variant contains, it could for example be a string, despite that not being allowed, but I guess it's up to the `cargo check` diagnostics to inform of such issues anyway?
Ensure at least one trait bound in `TyKind::DynTy`
One would expect `TyKind::DynTy` to have at least one trait bound, but we may produce a dyn type with no trait bounds at all. This patch prevents it by returning `TyKind::Error` in such cases.
An "empty" dyn type would have caused panic during method resolution without #13257. Although already fixed, I think an invariant to never produce such types would help prevent similar problems in the future.
Add a new configuration settings to set env vars when running cargo, rustc, etc. commands: cargo.extraEnv and checkOnSave.extraEnv
It can be extremely useful to be able to set environment variables when rust-analyzer is running various cargo or rustc commands (such as `cargo check`, `cargo --print cfg` or `cargo metadata`): users may want to set custom `RUSTFLAGS`, change `PATH` to use a custom toolchain or set a different `CARGO_HOME`.
There is the existing `server.extraEnv` setting that allows env vars to be set when the rust-analyzer server is launched, but using this as the recommended mechanism to also configure cargo/rust has some drawbacks:
- It convolutes configuring the rust-analyzer server with configuring cargo/rustc (one may want to change the `PATH` for cargo/rustc without affecting the rust-analyzer server).
- The name `server.extraEnv` doesn't indicate that cargo/rustc will be affected but renaming it to `cargo.extraEnv` doesn't indicate that the rust-analyzer server would be affected.
- To make the setting useful, it needs to be dynamically reloaded without requiring that the entire extension is reloaded. It might be possible to do this, but it would require the client communicating to the server what the overwritten env vars were at first launch, which isn't easy to do.
This change adds two new configuration settings: `cargo.extraEnv` and `checkOnSave.extraEnv` that can be used to change the environment for the rust-analyzer server after launch (thus affecting any process that rust-analyzer invokes) and the `cargo check` command respectively. `cargo.extraEnv` supports dynamic changes by keeping track of the pre-change values of environment variables, thus it can undo changes made previously before applying the new configuration (and then requesting a workspace reload).
Fix add reference action on macros.
Before we were using the range of the corresponding expression node in the macro expanded file, which is obviously incorrect as we are setting the text in the original source.
For some reason, the test I added is failing and I haven't found a way to fix it. Does anyone know why `check_fix` wouldn't work with macros? Getting this error:
```text
thread 'handlers::type_mismatch::tests::test_add_reference_to_macro_call' panicked at 'no diagnostics', crates/ide-diagnostics/src/handlers/type_mismatch.rs:317:9
```
closes#13219
Use memmem when searching for usages in ide-db
We already have this dependency, so there is no reason not to use it as it is generally faster than std in our use case.
Refactor macro-by-example code
I had a look at the MBE code because of #7857. I found some easy readability wins, that might also _marginally_ improve perf.
