Reorder early post-inlining passes.
`RemoveZsts`, `RemoveUnneededDrops` and `UninhabitedEnumBranching` only depend on types, so they should be executed together early after MIR inlining introduces those types.
This does not change the end-result, but this makes the pipeline a bit more consistent.
Stop allowing `rustc::potential_query_instability` on all of
rustc_mir_transform and instead allow it on a case-by-case basis if it
is safe to do so. In this particular crate, all instances were safe to
allow.
Implement constant propagation on top of MIR SSA analysis
This implements the idea I proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110719#issuecomment-1718324700
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109597
The value numbering "GVN" pass formulates each rvalue that appears in MIR with an abstract form (the `Value` enum), and assigns an integer `VnIndex` to each. This abstract form can be used to deduplicate values, reusing an earlier local that holds the same value instead of recomputing. This part is proposed in #109597.
From this abstract representation, we can perform more involved simplifications, for example in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111344.
With the abstract representation `Value`, we can also attempt to evaluate each to a constant using the interpreter. This builds a `VnIndex -> OpTy` map. From this map, we can opportunistically replace an operand or a rvalue with a constant if their value has an associated `OpTy`.
The most relevant commit is [Evaluated computed values to constants.](2767c4912e)"
r? `@oli-obk`
Currently we always do this:
```
use rustc_fluent_macro::fluent_messages;
...
fluent_messages! { "./example.ftl" }
```
But there is no need, we can just do this everywhere:
```
rustc_fluent_macro::fluent_messages! { "./example.ftl" }
```
which is shorter.
The `fluent_messages!` macro produces uses of
`crate::{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, which means that every crate using
the macro must have this import:
```
use rustc_errors::{DiagnosticMessage, SubdiagnosticMessage};
```
This commit changes the macro to instead use
`rustc_errors::{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, which avoids the need for the
imports.
See through aggregates in GVN
This PR is extracted from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111344
The first 2 commit are cleanups to avoid repeated work. I propose to stop removing useless assignments as part of this pass, and let a later `SimplifyLocals` do it. This makes tests easier to read (among others).
The next 3 commits add a constant folding mechanism to the GVN pass, presented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116012. ~This pass is designed to only use global allocations, to avoid any risk of accidental modification of the stored state.~
The following commits implement opportunistic simplifications, in particular:
- projections of aggregates: `MyStruct { x: a }.x` gets replaced by `a`, works with enums too;
- projections of arrays: `[a, b][0]` becomes `a`;
- projections of repeat expressions: `[a; N][x]` becomes `a`;
- transform arrays of equal operands into a repeat rvalue.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3090
r? `@oli-obk`
Do not check for impossible predicates in const-prop lint.
The enclosing query already checks for them, and replaces the body with a single `unreachable` if they are indeed impossible.
rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const
Also, be more consistent with the `to/eval_bits` methods... we had some that take a type and some that take a size, and then sometimes the one that takes a type is called `bits_for_ty`.
Turns out that `ty::Const`/`mir::ConstKind` carry their type with them, so we don't need to even pass the type to those `eval_bits` functions at all.
However this is not properly consistent yet: in `ty` we have most of the methods on `ty::Const`, but in `mir` we have them on `mir::ConstKind`. And indeed those two types are the ones that correspond to each other. So `mir::ConstantKind` should actually be renamed to `mir::Const`. But what to do with `mir::Constant`? It carries around a span, that's really more like a constant operand that appears as a MIR operand... it's more suited for `syntax.rs` than `consts.rs`, but the bigger question is, which name should it get if we want to align the `mir` and `ty` types? `ConstOperand`? `ConstOp`? `Literal`? It's not a literal but it has a field called `literal` so it would at least be consistently wrong-ish...
``@oli-obk`` any ideas?
Make module inner and function run_analysis_to_runtime_passes in
rustc_mir_transform public to allow re-implementing the query from the
rust compiler interface.
Make `unconditional_recursion` warning detect recursive drops
Closes#55388
Also closes#50049 unless we want to keep it for the second example which this PR does not solve, but I think it is better to track that work in #57965.
r? `@oli-obk` since you are the mentor for #55388
Unresolved questions:
- [x] There are two false positives that must be fixed before merging (see diff). I suspect the best way to solve them is to perform analysis after drop elaboration instead of before, as now, but I have not explored that any further yet. Could that be an option? **Answer:** Yes, that solved the problem.
`@rustbot` label +T-compiler +C-enhancement +A-lint
