Abort a process when FD ownership is violated
When an owned FD has already been closed before it's dropped that means something else touched an FD in ways it is not allowed to. At that point things can already be arbitrarily bad, e.g. clobbered mmaps. Recovery is not possible.
All we can do is hasten the fire.
Unlike the previous attempt in #124130 this shouldn't suffer from the possibility that FUSE filesystems can return arbitrary errors.
Add support for Arm64EC to the Standard Library
Adds the final pieces so that the standard library can be built for arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc (initially added in #119199)
* Bumps `windows-sys` to 0.56.0, which adds support for Arm64EC.
* Correctly set the `isEC` parameter for LLVM's `writeArchive` function.
* Add `#![feature(asm_experimental_arch)]` to library crates where Arm64EC inline assembly is used, as it is currently unstable.
Document restricted_std
This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't.
This commit fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27242https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103765).
Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support.
I propose closing https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time.
The alternative to closing https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std.
cc ```@ehuss```
This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve
and what it isn't.
This commit fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/87
by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has.
The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some
form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an
OS should be moved to core/alloc (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27242https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103765).
Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120232, libstd can be built for
some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably
should be unstable https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/90),
but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have
some partial libstd support.
I propose closing https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/69
as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os,
vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust
or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed
long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only
solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std
support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these
platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should
mainly improve over time.
The alternative to closing https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware/issues/69
is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std
mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features
flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway.
A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as
unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std.
Replace pthread `RwLock` with custom implementation
This is one of the last items in #93740. I'm doing `RwLock` first because it is more self-contained and has less tradeoffs to make. The motivation is explained in the documentation, but in short: the pthread rwlock is slow and buggy and `std` can do much better. I considered implementing a parking lot, as was discussed in the tracking issue, but settled for the queue-based version because writing self-balancing binary trees is not fun in Rust...
This is a rather complex change, so I have added quite a bit of documentation to help explain it. Please point out any part that could be explained better.
~~The read performance is really good, I'm getting 4x the throughput of the pthread version and about the same performance as usync/parking_lot on an Apple M1 Max in the usync benchmark suite, but the write performance still falls way behind what usync and parking_lot achieve. I tried using a separate queue lock like what usync uses, but that didn't help. I'll try to investigate further in the future, but I wanted to get some eyes on this first.~~ [Resolved](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110211#issuecomment-1513682336)
r? `@m-ou-se`
CC `@kprotty`
Use `assert_unchecked` instead of `assume` intrinsic in the standard library
Now that a public wrapper for the `assume` intrinsic exists, we can use it in the standard library.
CC #119131
merge core_panic feature into panic_internals
I don't know why those are two separate features, but it does not seem intentional. This merge is useful because with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118123, panic_internals is recognized as an internal feature, but core_panic is not -- but core_panic definitely should be internal.
