Rename `IndexVec::last` → `last_index`
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
Check for overflow in `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`
Prevents a stack overflow (⚠️❗) in the new solver when we have param-env candidates that look like: `T: Trait<Assoc = <T as Trait>::Assoc>`
The current error message looks bad, but that's because we don't distinguish overflow and other ambiguity errors. I'll break that out into a separate PR since the fix may be controversial.
r? `@lcnr`
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91793 (socket ancillary data implementation for FreeBSD (from 13 and above).)
- #92284 (Change advance(_back)_by to return the remainder instead of the number of processed elements)
- #102472 (stop special-casing `'static` in evaluation)
- #108480 (Use Rayon's TLV directly)
- #109321 (Erase impl regions when checking for impossible to eagerly monomorphize items)
- #109470 (Correctly substitute GAT's type used in `normalize_param_env` in `check_type_bounds`)
- #109562 (Update ar_archive_writer to 0.1.3)
- #109629 (remove obsolete `givens` from regionck)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add a builtin `FnPtr` trait that is implemented for all function pointers
r? `@ghost`
Rebased version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99531 (plus adjustments mentioned in the PR).
If perf is happy with this version, I would like to land it, even if the diagnostics fix in 9df8e1befb5031a5bf9d8dfe25170620642d3c59 only works for `FnPtr` specifically, and does not generally improve blanket impls.
stop special-casing `'static` in evaluation
fixes#102360
I have no idea whether this actually removed all places where `'static` matters. Without canonicalization it's very easy to accidentally rely on `'static` again. Blocked on changing the `order_dependent_trait_objects` future-compat lint to a hard error
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Don't elaborate non-obligations into obligations
It's suspicious to elaborate a `PolyTraitRef` or `Predicate` into an `Obligation`, since the former does not have a param-env associated with it, but the latter does. This is a footgun that, while not being misused *currently* in the compiler, easily could be misused by someone less familiar with the elaborator's inner workings.
This PR just changes the API -- ideally, the elaborator wouldn't even have to deal with obligations if we're not elaborating obligations, but that would require a bit more abstraction than I could be bothered with today.
Implement non-const `Destruct` trait in new solver
Makes it so that we can call stdlib methods like `Option::map` in **non-const** environments, since *many* stdlib methods have `Destruct` bounds 😅
This doesn't bother to implement `const Destruct` yet, but it shouldn't be too hard to do so. Just didn't bother since we already don't have much support for const traits in the new solver anyways. I'd be happy to add skeleton support for `const Destruct`, though, if the reviewer desires.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108629 (rustdoc: add support for type filters in arguments and generics)
- #108924 (panic_immediate_abort requires abort as a panic strategy)
- #108961 (Refine error spans for const args in hir typeck)
- #108986 (sync LVI tests)
- #109142 (Add block-based mutex unlocking example)
- #109368 (fix typo in the creation of OpenOption for RustyHermit)
- #109493 (Return nested obligations from canonical response var unification)
- #109515 (Add AixLinker to support linking on AIX)
- #109536 (resolve: Rename some cstore methods to match queries and add comments)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Return nested obligations from canonical response var unification
Handle alias-eq obligations being emitted from `instantiate_and_apply_query_response` in:
* `EvalCtxt` - by processing the nested obligations in the next loop by `new_goals`
* `FulfillCtxt` - by adding the nested obligations to the fulfillment's pending obligations
* `InferCtxt::evaluate_obligation` - ~~by returning `EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig` (boo 👎, see the FIXME)~~ same behavior as above, since we use fulfillment and `select_where_possible`
The only one that's truly sketchy is `evaluate_obligation`, but it's not hard to modify this behavior moving forward.
From #109037, I think a smaller repro could be crafted if I were smarter, but I am not, so I just took this from #105878.
r? `@lcnr` cc `@BoxyUwU`
Refine error spans for const args in hir typeck
Improve just a couple of error messages having to do with mismatched consts.
r? `@ghost` i'll put this up when the dependent commits are merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108541 (Suppress `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` for nested RPITs)
- #109137 (resolve: Querify most cstore access methods (subset 2))
- #109380 (add `known-bug` test for unsoundness issue)
- #109462 (Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate))
- #109475 (Simpler checked shifts in MIR building)
- #109504 (Stabilize `arc_into_inner` and `rc_into_inner`.)
- #109506 (make param bound vars visibly bound vars with -Zverbose)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate)
Emitting an "alias-eq" is too strict in some situations, since we don't always want strict equality between a projection and rigid ty. Adds a relation direction.
* I could probably just reuse this [`RelationDir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/combine/enum.RelationDir.html) -- happy to uplift that struct into middle and use that instead, but I didn't feel compelled to... 🤷
* Some of the matching in `compute_alias_relate_goal` is a bit verbose -- I guess I could simplify it by using [`At::relate`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/at/struct.At.html#method.relate) and mapping the relation-dir to a variance.
* Alternatively, I coulld simplify things by making more helper functions on `EvalCtxt` (e.g. `EvalCtxt::relate_with_direction(T, T)` that also does the nested goal registration). No preference.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@BoxyUwU``` though boxy can claim it if she wants
NOTE: first commit is all the changes, the second is just renaming stuff
new solver cleanup + implement coherence
the cleanup:
- change `Certainty::unify_and` to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig
- rename `trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` to `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
- remove outdated fixme
For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.
a general type system cleanup
removes the helper functions `traits::fully_solve_X` as they add more complexity then they are worth. It's confusing which of these helpers should be used in which context.
changes the way we deal with overflow to always add depth in `evaluate_predicates_recursively`. It may make sense to actually fully transition to not have `recursion_depth` on obligations but that's probably a bit too much for this PR.
also removes some other small - and imo unnecessary - helpers.
r? types
Do not suggest bounds restrictions for synthesized RPITITs
Before this PR we were getting ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
5 | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
17 | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
13 | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
21 | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
help: consider further restricting the associated type
|
16 | fn test2<T: Foo>() where impl Future<Output = ()>: Send {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
and we want this output ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
LL | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
LL | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
LL | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
LL | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
Only implement Fn* traits for extern "Rust" safe function pointers and items
Since calling the function via an `Fn` trait will assume `extern "Rust"` ABI and not do any safety checks, only safe `extern "Rust"` function can implement the `Fn` traits. This syncs the logic between the old solver and the new solver.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched
When equating two consts of different types, if either are const variables, constrain them to the correct const error kind.
This helps us avoid "successfully" matching a const against an impl signature but leaving unconstrained const vars, which will lead to incremental ICEs when we call const-eval queries during const projection.
Fixes#109296
The second commit in the stack fixes a regression in the first commit where we end up mentioning `[const error]` in an impl overlap error message. I think the error message changes for the better, but I could implement alternative strategies to avoid this without delaying the overlap error message...
r? `@BoxyUwU`
