stabilize combining +bundle and +whole-archive link modifiers
Per discussion on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108081 combining +bundle and +whole-archive already works and can be stabilized independently of other aspects of the packed_bundled_libs feature. There is no risk of regression because this was not previously allowed.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Currently, combining +bundle and +whole-archive works only with
#![feature(packed_bundled_libs)]
This crate feature is independent of the -Zpacked-bundled-libs
command line option.
This commit stabilizes the #![feature(packed_bundled_libs)] crate
feature and implicitly enables it only when the +bundle and
+whole-archive link modifiers are combined. This allows rlib
crates to use the +whole-archive link modifier with native
libraries and have all symbols included in the linked library
to be included in downstream staticlib crates that use the rlib as
a dependency. Other cases requiring the packed_bundled_libs
behavior still require the -Zpacked-bundled-libs command line
option, which can be stabilized independently in the future.
Per discussion on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108081
there is no risk of regression stabilizing the crate feature in
this way because the combination of +bundle,+whole-archive link
modifiers was previously not allowed.
Write to stdout if `-` is given as output file
With this PR, if `-o -` or `--emit KIND=-` is provided, output will be written to stdout instead. Binary output (those of type `obj`, `llvm-bc`, `link` and `metadata`) being written this way will result in an error unless stdout is not a tty. Multiple output types going to stdout will trigger an error too, as they will all be mixded together.
This implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/431
The idea behind the changes is to introduce an `OutFileName` enum that represents the output - be it a real path or stdout - and to use this enum along the code paths that handle different output types.
If `-o -` or `--emit KIND=-` is provided, output will be written
to stdout instead. Binary output (`obj`, `llvm-bc`, `link` and
`metadata`) being written this way will result in an error unless
stdout is not a tty. Multiple output types going to stdout will
trigger an error too, as they will all be mixded together.
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
Instead of loading the Fluent resources for every crate in
`rustc_error_messages`, each crate generates typed identifiers for its
own diagnostics and creates a static which are pulled together in the
`rustc_driver` crate and provided to the diagnostic emitter.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Migrate `codegen_ssa` to diagnostics structs - [Part 3]
Completes migrating `codegen_ssa` module except 2 outstanding errors that depend on other crates:
1. [`rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError`](b6097f2e1b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs (L475)): I saw `rustc_middle` is unassigned, I am open to take this work.
2. `codegen_llvm`'s use of `fn span_invalid_monomorphization_error`, which I started to replace in the [last commit](9a31b3cdda) of this PR, but would like to know the team's preference on how we should keep replacing the other macros:
2.1. Update macros to expect a `Diagnostic`
2.2. Remove macros and expand the code on each use.
See [some examples of the different options in this experimental commit](64aee83e80)
_Part 2 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103792_
r? ``@davidtwco``
Cc ``@compiler-errors``
FIX - StrippingDebugInfoFailed typo
DELETE - unneeded FIXME comment
UPDATE - only declare the error with ExtractBundledLibsError as an enum and use the Diagnostic derive macro
- UPDATE - revert migration of logs
- UPDATE - use derive on LinkRlibError enum
- [Gardening] UPDATE - alphabetically sort fluent_messages
- UPDATE - use PathBuf and unify both AddNativeLibrary to use Display (which is what PathBuf uses when conforming to IntoDiagnosticArg)
- UPDATE - fluent messages sort after rebase
