nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-10-31 22:41:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
207,117 Commits 7 Branches 139 Tags 1.9 GiB
31c269ae75
Commit Graph

831 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nathan Stocks
31c269ae75 avoid string dispatch in fluent 2022-10-07 14:39:09 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
57eba4f535 avoid string dispatch in fluent 2022-10-07 13:19:28 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
8e07a85ad7 Remove code that was removed in master, and the corresponding diagnostic 2022-10-07 13:19:28 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
965dbf6c28 First batch of review feedback changes from #102110 2022-10-07 13:19:28 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
be4059dd3e migrate stability.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
3fe8e004e9 migrate the rest of check_attr.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
a7aa1850b2 migrate dead.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
f0afb88302 migrate lang_items.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
b17ec43637 migrate entry.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
96f92eab68 migrate naked_functions.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
69766e4f16 migrate loops.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
572f3414b7 migrate check_const.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
c457abee2e migrate lib_features.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
40d5f00e16 migrate layout_test.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
0609c0f1da migrate diagnostic_items.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
3a748330af use cherry-picked commit from #100754 to emit note without error 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
1e86226e9d migrate debugger_visualizer.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
c103c3059f migrate the rest of weak_lang_items.rs to translateable diagnostics 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Diego de Oliveira
1222541cfd resolve merge conflict from cherry-picking 6a47326a04 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
Nathan Stocks
b8e03cfa55 use consistent names 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
rdvdev2
2c3351c9a6 Migrate InvalidAttrAtCrateLevel 
Co-authored-by: Nathan Stocks <cleancut@github.com>
Co-authored-by: rdvdev2 <rdvdev2@gmail.com>
 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
rdvdev2
0315d7c9db Migrate derivable diagnostics in check_attr.rs 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
rdvdev2
17a4a68ab0 Migrate derivable diagnostics in lang_items.rs 2022-10-07 13:19:27 -06:00
rdvdev2
2f74d1d14f Migrate weak_lang_items.rs 2022-10-07 13:19:26 -06:00
rdvdev2
bde80f745b Add lint for diagnostic migration 2022-10-07 13:19:26 -06:00
Oli Scherer
c72c6e01c8 Merge the ~const and impl const checks and add some explanatory notes 2022-10-04 08:59:20 +00:00
bors
744e397d88 Auto merge of #101986 - WaffleLapkin:move_lint_note_to_the_bottom, r=estebank 
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom

So, uhhhhh

r? `@estebank`

## User-facing change

"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
-   = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
   = note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+   = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```

Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.

## Developer-facing change

`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.

Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`

The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.

Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.

## Subtle problem

By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...

I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.

## P.S.

I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
 2022-10-01 10:44:25 +00:00
Maybe Waffle
a8f7e244b7 Refactor rustc lint API 2022-10-01 10:03:06 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
c07ebeb74b
Rollup merge of #102361 - fee1-dead-contrib:fix-102156, r=eholk 
Fix ICE in const_trait check code

This fixes #102156.
 2022-09-30 23:38:24 +02:00
fee1-dead
d7fe44d988 Use let chains instead of let else 2022-09-30 00:31:53 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
f07d4efc45 Shrink hir::def::Res. 
`Res::SelfTy` currently has two `Option`s. When the second one is `Some`
the first one is never consulted. So we can split it into two variants,
`Res::SelfTyParam` and `Res::SelfTyAlias`, reducing the size of `Res`
from 24 bytes to 12. This then shrinks `hir::Path` and
`hir::PathSegment`, which are the HIR types that take up the most space.
 2022-09-29 08:44:52 +10:00
Deadbeef
27b280e1b5 Fix ICE in const_trait check code 
This fixes #102156.
 2022-09-27 13:47:32 +00:00
lcnr
1fc86a63f4 rustc_typeck to rustc_hir_analysis 2022-09-27 10:37:23 +02:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
fee1-dead
1a93028bcc
Rollup merge of #101851 - Xiretza:diagnostic-derive-cleanups, r=davidtwco 
Clean up (sub)diagnostic derives

The biggest chunk of this is unifying the parsing of subdiagnostic attributes (`#[error]`, `#[suggestion(...)]`, `#[label(...)]`, etc) between `Subdiagnostic` and `Diagnostic` type attributes as well as `Diagnostic` field attributes.

It also improves a number of proc macro diagnostics.

Waiting for #101558.
 2022-09-26 09:27:36 +08:00
Takayuki Maeda
8fe936099a separate definitions and HIR owners 
fix a ui test

use `into`

fix clippy ui test

fix a run-make-fulldeps test

implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`

use `OwnerId` for more queries

change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
 2022-09-24 23:21:19 +09:00
bors
4d44e09cb1 Auto merge of #102165 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-n5oquhe, r=matthiaskrgr 
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100734 (Split out async_fn_in_trait into a separate feature)
 - #101664 (Note if mismatched types have a similar name)
 - #101815 (Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure)
 - #102042 (Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.)
 - #102066 (rustdoc: remove unnecessary `max-width` on headers)
 - #102095 (Deduplicate two functions that would soon have been three)
 - #102104 (Set 'exec-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' in const-eval-select tests)
 - #102112 (Allow full relro on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
 2022-09-23 09:33:23 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
695b708311
Rollup merge of #101815 - diegooliveira:master, r=davidtwco 
Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure

Small change to move the validation for annotations to the new diagnostic infrastructure.
 2022-09-23 04:29:16 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
c5d223033b
Rollup merge of #102127 - TaKO8Ki:use-appropriate-variable-names, r=lcnr 
Use appropriate variable names
 2022-09-22 21:34:52 +02:00
Xiretza
ae56d2a118 Add missing code="" attributes to suggestion subdiagnostics 2022-09-22 17:25:50 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
2d7f987715 use appropriate variable names 2022-09-22 16:11:51 +09:00
bors
7a8636c843 Auto merge of #100982 - fee1-dead-contrib:const-impl-requires-const-trait, r=oli-obk 
Require `#[const_trait]` on `Trait` for `impl const Trait`

r? `@oli-obk`
 2022-09-22 04:22:24 +00:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
e52e2344dc FIX - adopt new Diagnostic naming in newly migrated modules 
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs

UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic

[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`

FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way

DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method

FIX - broken test

FIX - Rebase conflict

UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
 2022-09-21 11:43:22 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic 
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
a6b34cd928
Rollup merge of #101713 - Bryanskiy:AccessLevels, r=petrochenkov 
change AccessLevels representation

Part of RFC (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054). This patch implements effective visibility table with basic methods and change AccessLevels table representation according to it.

r? ``@petrochenkov``
 2022-09-17 23:30:49 +02:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett 
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
 2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
Rageking8
d433efa649 more simple formatting 2022-09-16 19:07:42 +08:00
Deadbeef
81b1810cd7 Require #[const_trait] for const impls 2022-09-16 11:48:42 +08:00