Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89561 (Type inference for inline consts)
- #90035 (implement rfc-2528 type_changing-struct-update)
- #90613 (Allow to run a specific rustdoc-js* test)
- #90683 (Make `compiler-docs` only control the default instead of being a hard off-switch)
- #90685 (x.py: remove fixme by deleting code)
- #90701 (Record more artifact sizes during self-profiling.)
- #90723 (Better document `Box` and `alloc::alloc::box_free` connection)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Type inference for inline consts
Fixes#78132Fixes#78174Fixes#81857Fixes#89964
Perform type checking/inference of inline consts in the same context as the outer def, similar to what is currently done to closure.
Doing so would require `closure_base_def_id` of the inline const to return the outer def, and since `closure_base_def_id` can be called on non-local crate (and thus have no HIR available), a new `DefKind` is created for inline consts.
The type of the generated anon const can capture lifetime of outer def, so we couldn't just use the typeck result as the type of the inline const's def. Closure has a similar issue, and it uses extra type params `CK, CS, U` to capture closure kind, input/output signature and upvars. I use a similar approach for inline consts, letting it have an extra type param `R`, and then `typeof(InlineConst<[paremt generics], R>)` would just be `R`. In borrowck region requirements are also propagated to the outer MIR body just like it's currently done for closure.
With this PR, inline consts in expression position are quitely usable now; however the usage in pattern position is still incomplete -- since those does not remain in the MIR borrowck couldn't verify the lifetime there. I have left an ignored test as a FIXME.
Some disucssions can be found on [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/inline.20consts.20typeck).
cc `````@spastorino````` `````@lcnr`````
r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
`````@rustbot````` label A-inference F-inline_const T-compiler
Use `is_global` in `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes#90195.
Revert "Add rustc lint, warning when iterating over hashmaps"
Fixes perf regressions introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90235 by temporarily reverting the relevant PR.
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes#90195.
Use the "nice E0277 errors"[1] for `!Send` `impl Future` from foreign crate
Partly address #78543 by making the error quieter.
We don't have access to the `typeck` tables from foreign crates, so we
used to completely skip the new code when checking foreign crates. Now,
we carry on and don't provide as nice output (we don't clarify *what* is
making the `Future: !Send`), but at least we no longer emit a sea of
derived obligations in the output.
[1]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2019/10/11/AsyncAwait-Not-Send-Error-Improvements.html
r? `@tmandry`
Partly address #78543 by making the error quieter.
We don't have access to the `typeck` tables from foreign crates, so we
used to completely skip the new code when checking foreign crates. Now,
we carry on and don't provide as nice output (we don't clarify *what* is
making the `Future: !Send`), but at least we no longer emit a sea of
derived obligations in the output.
[1]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2019/10/11/AsyncAwait-Not-Send-Error-Improvements.html
Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
This doesn't work properly yet, we would probably need to implement an
`assembly_neg_candidates` and consider things like `T: !AB` as `T: !A`
|| `T: !B`
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
Remove redundant member-constraint check
impl trait will, for each lifetime in the hidden type, register a "member constraint" that says the lifetime must be equal or outlive one of the lifetimes of the impl trait. These member constraints will be solved by borrowck
But, as you can see in the big red block of removed code, there was an ad-hoc check for member constraints happening at the site where they get registered. This check had some minor effects on diagnostics, but will fall down on its feet with my big type alias impl trait refactor. So we removed it and I pulled the removal out into a (hopefully) reviewable PR that works on master directly.
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
Add `const_eval_select` intrinsic
Adds an intrinsic that calls a given function when evaluated at compiler time, but generates a call to another function when called at runtime.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/7 for previous discussion.
r? `@oli-obk.`
Prevent error reporting from outputting a recursion error if it finds an ambiguous trait impl during suggestions
Closes#89275
This fixes the compiler reporting a recursion error during another already in progress error by trying to make a conversion method suggestion and encounters ambiguous trait implementations that can convert a the original type into a type that can then be recursively converted into itself via another method in the trait.
Updated OverflowError struct to be an enum so I could differentiate between passes - it's no longer a ZST but I don't think that should be a problem as they only generate when there's an error in compiling code anyway
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89298 (Issue 89193 - Fix ICE when using `usize` and `isize` with SIMD gathers )
- #89461 (Add `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint.)
- #89477 (Move items related to computing diffs to a separate file)
- #89559 (RustWrapper: adapt for LLVM API change)
- #89585 (Emit item no type error even if type inference fails)
- #89596 (Make cfg imply doc(cfg))
- #89615 (Add InferCtxt::with_opaque_type_inference to get_body_with_borrowck_facts)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint.
Initial implementation of #89460. Resolves#89190.
Maybe also worth a beta backport if necessary.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Consider unfulfilled obligations in binop errors
When encountering a binop where the types would have been accepted, if
all the predicates had been fulfilled, include information about the
predicates and suggest appropriate `#[derive]`s if possible.
Fix#84515.
When encountering a binop where the types would have been accepted, if
all the predicates had been fulfilled, include information about the
predicates and suggest appropriate `#[derive]`s if possible.
Point at trait(s) that needs to be `impl`emented.
Move generic error message to separate branches
This decomposes an error message in generic constants into more specific branches, for better
readability.
r? ``@lcnr``
Fixed numerus of error message
When there are redundant trait requirements and these are hidden, a message is generated by the following code snippet:
`format!("{} redundant requirements hidden", count)`
But if there is only a single hidden requirement, it will still print this message in plural instead of singular.
Correctly handle supertraits for min_specialization
Supertraits of specialization markers could circumvent checks for
min_specialization. Elaborating predicates prevents this.
r? ````@nikomatsakis````
Make diangostic item naming consistent
Right now there is about a 50/50 split of naming diagnostic items as `vec_type` vs `Vec`. So it is hard to guess a diagnostic item name with confidence. I know it's not great to change these retroactively, but I think it will be much easier to maintain consistency after consistency is established.
Coerce const FnDefs to implement const Fn traits
You can now pass a FnDef to a function expecting `F` where `F: ~const FnTrait`.
r? ``@oli-obk``
``@rustbot`` label T-compiler F-const_trait_impl
Don't normalize opaque types with escaping late-bound regions
Fixes#88862
Turns out, this has some really bad perf implications in large types (issue #88862). While we technically can handle them fine, it doesn't change test output either way. For now, revert with an added benchmark. Future attempts to change this back will have to consider perf.
Needs a perf run once https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/1033 is merged
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Turns out, this has some really bad perf implications in large types (issue #88862). While we technically can handle them fine, it doesn't change test output either way. For now, revert with an added benchmark. Future attempts to change this back will have to consider perf.
