Eliminate some `FIXME(lcnr)` comments
In some cases this involved changing code. In some cases the comment was able to removed or replaced.
r? ``@lcnr``
Add benchmarks for `impl Debug for str`
In order to inform future perf improvements and prevent regressions, lets add some benchmarks that stress `impl Debug for str`.
---
As I am currently working on improving the perf in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121150, its nice to have these benchmarks.
Writing them, I also saw that escapes are written out one char at a time, even though other parts of the code are already optimizing that via `as_str`, which I intend to do as well as a followup improvement.
r? ``@cuviper``
☝🏻 as you were also assigned to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121150, CC ``@the8472`` if you want to steal the review :-)
Upgrade pre-built Clang used in MSVC and MacOS builds, move MSVC builds to Server 2022
Fixes#92948
Example working MacOS and Windows builds: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/8989360201>
There is a [bug in Clang 18](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81849) that causes issues when building for Arm64 in later parts of the build (specifically `libgit2`). As a workaround, we will still use the pre-built Clang to build LLVM but will use MSVC for the rest of the Arm64 build.
Document tests in the `run-make` directory (A to C)
Part of the #121876 project.
This PR adds comments to some `run-make` tests which lack one, explaining _what_ is being tested. If possible, a link to the relevant PR or Issue responsible for the test is also provided.
This will help the porting efforts to `rmake.rs`, and will also allow maintainers to focus efforts on tests which are more pertinent to port. For example, [this test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/run-make/cat-and-grep-sanity-check/Makefile) will become useless after all tests containing `CGREP` are successfully ported.
In order to simplify review and at the suggestion of Kobzol on the rust-lang #gsoc Zulip, only the first 23 comments are part of this PR. If it is merged, future PRs will ensue commenting the rest of the tests.
Could be an UI test:
- `dep-info-doesnt-run-much`
Make `#![feature]` suggestion MaybeIncorrect
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12784
The `unstable_name_collisions` lint uses `disabled_nightly_features` to mention the feature name, but accepting the suggestion would result in an ambiguity error
There are other calls where accepting the feature gate would fix code when ran with `cargo fix --broken-code`, though it's not always desirable to add a feature gate even if the user is currently on nightly so MaybeIncorrect seems appropriate
Add `ErrorGuaranteed` to `Recovered::Yes` and use it more.
The starting point for this was identical comments on two different fields, in `ast::VariantData::Struct` and `hir::VariantData::Struct`:
```
// FIXME: investigate making this a `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`
recovered: bool
```
I tried that, and then found that I needed to add an `ErrorGuaranteed` to `Recovered::Yes`. Then I ended up using `Recovered` instead of `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>` for these two places and elsewhere, which required moving `ErrorGuaranteed` from `rustc_parse` to `rustc_ast`.
This makes things more consistent, because `Recovered` is used in more places, and there are fewer uses of `bool` and
`Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`. And safer, because it's difficult/impossible to set `recovered` to `Recovered::Yes` without having emitted an error.
r? `@oli-obk`
fix#124714 str.to_lowercase sigma handling
Hello,
This PR fixes issue #124714 about 'Σ' handling in `str.to_lowercase()`.
The fix consists in considering the full original string during 'Σ' handling instead of considering just the substring left after the optimized ascii handling.
A new test is added to avoid regression.
Thanks!
Tidy check for test revisions that are mentioned but not declared
If a `[revision]` name appears in a test header directive or error annotation, but isn't declared in the `//@ revisions:` header, that is almost always a mistake.
In cases where a revision needs to be temporarily disabled, adding it to an `//@ unused-revision-names:` header will suppress these checks for that name.
Adding the wildcard name `*` to the unused list will suppress these checks for the entire file.
(None of the tests actually use `*`; it's just there because it was easy to add and could be handy as an escape hatch when dealing with other problems.)
---
Most of the existing problems discovered by this check were fairly straightforward to fix (or ignore); the trickiest cases are in `borrowck` tests.
CI: enable arbitrary try builds, take two
Fixed version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124631, which hopefully won't completely break our CI this time 🤦♂️ Sorry once again. Only the last commit is new.
r? `@pietroalbini`
The comment mentions that `ReBound` and `ReVar` aren't expected here.
Experimentation with the full test suite indicates this is true, and
that `ReErased` also doesn't occur. So the commit introduces `bug!` for
those cases. (If any of them show up later on, at least we'll have a
test case.)
The commit also remove the first sentence in the comment.
`RePlaceholder` is now handled in the match arm above this comment and
nothing is printed for it, so that sentence is just wrong. Furthermore,
issue #13998 was closed some time ago.
The starting point for this was identical comments on two different
fields, in `ast::VariantData::Struct` and `hir::VariantData::Struct`:
```
// FIXME: investigate making this a `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`
recovered: bool
```
I tried that, and then found that I needed to add an `ErrorGuaranteed`
to `Recovered::Yes`. Then I ended up using `Recovered` instead of
`Option<ErrorGuaranteed>` for these two places and elsewhere, which
required moving `ErrorGuaranteed` from `rustc_parse` to `rustc_ast`.
This makes things more consistent, because `Recovered` is used in more
places, and there are fewer uses of `bool` and
`Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`. And safer, because it's difficult/impossible
to set `recovered` to `Recovered::Yes` without having emitted an error.
Do not add leading asterisk in the `PartialEq`
I think we should address this issue, however I am not exactly sure, if this is the right way to do it. It is related to the #123056.
Imagine the simplified code:
```rust
trait MyTrait {}
impl PartialEq for dyn MyTrait {
fn eq(&self, _other: &Self) -> bool {
true
}
}
#[derive(PartialEq)]
enum Bar {
Foo(Box<dyn MyTrait>),
}
```
On the nightly compiler, the `derive` produces invalid code with the weird error message:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `*__arg1_0` which is behind a shared reference
--> src/main.rs:11:9
|
9 | #[derive(PartialEq)]
| --------- in this derive macro expansion
10 | enum Things {
11 | Foo(Box<dyn MyTrait>),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ move occurs because `*__arg1_0` has type `Box<dyn MyTrait>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `PartialEq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
It may be related to the perfect derive problem, although requiring the _type_ to be `Copy` seems unfortunate because it is not necessary. Besides, we are adding the extra dereference only for the diagnostics?
If a `[revision]` name appears in a test header directive or error annotation,
but isn't declared in the `//@ revisions:` header, that is almost always a
mistake.
In cases where a revision needs to be temporarily disabled, adding it to an
`//@ unused-revision-names:` header will suppress these checks for that name.
Adding the wildcard name `*` to the unused list will suppress these checks for
the entire file.
Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting
r? `@Urgau`
I saw the implementation in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124761, and I was wondering if we also need to handle field access. We do. Without this PR, we get this errant diagnostic:
```
error: casting references to a bigger memory layout than the backing allocation is undefined behavior, even if the reference is unused
--> /home/ben/rust/tests/ui/lint/reference_casting.rs:262:18
|
LL | let r = &mut v.0;
| --- backing allocation comes from here
LL | let ptr = r as *mut i32 as *mut Vec3<i32>;
| ------------------------------- casting happend here
LL | unsafe { *ptr = Vec3(0, 0, 0) }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: casting from `i32` (4 bytes) to `Vec3<i32>` (12 bytes)
```
Fix more ICEs in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`
There were 8 other calls to `expect_local` left in `on_unimplemented.rs` -- all of which (afaict) could be turned into ICEs.
I would really like to see validation of `on_unimplemented` separated from parsing, so we only emit errors here:
a60f077c38/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/check.rs (L836-L839)
...And gracefully fail instead when emitting trait predicate failures, not *ever* even trying to emit an error or a lint. But that's left for a separate PR.
r? `@estebank`
Fix Error Messages for `break` Inside Coroutines
Fixes#124495
Previously, `break` inside `gen` blocks and functions
were incorrectly identified to be enclosed by a closure.
This PR fixes it by displaying an appropriate error message
for async blocks, async closures, async functions, gen blocks,
gen closures, gen functions, async gen blocks, async gen closures
and async gen functions.
Note: gen closure and async gen closure are not supported by the
compiler yet but I have added an error message here assuming that
they might be implemented in the future.
~~Also, fixes grammar in a few places by replacing
`inside of a $coroutine` with `inside a $coroutine`.~~
Implement `as_chunks` with `split_at_unchecked`
We were discussing various ways to do [this on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/273534239310479360/273541522815713281/1236946363120619521), and in the process I noticed that <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/1P16P37Go> is emitting a panic path inside `as_chunks`. It optimizes out in release, but we could just not do that in the first place.
We're already doing unsafe code that depends on this value being calculated correctly, so might as well call `split_at_unchecked` instead of `split_at`.
It's a macro that just creates an enum with a `from_u32` method. It has
two arms. One is unused and the other has a single use.
This commit inlines that single use and removes the whole macro. This
increases readability because we don't have two different macros
interacting (`enum_from_u32` and `language_item_table`).
It provides a way to effectively embed a linked list within an
`IndexVec` and also iterate over that list. It's written in a very
generic way, involving two traits `Links` and `LinkElem`. But the
`Links` trait is only impl'd for `IndexVec` and `&IndexVec`, and the
whole thing is only used in one module within `rustc_borrowck`. So I
think it's over-engineered and hard to read. Plus it has no comments.
This commit removes it, and adds a (non-generic) local iterator for the
use within `rustc_borrowck`. Much simpler.
It is optimized for lists with a single element, avoiding the need for
an allocation in that case. But `SmallVec<[T; 1]>` also avoids the
allocation, and is better in general: more standard, log2 number of
allocations if the list exceeds one item, and a much more capable API.
This commit removes `TinyList` and converts the two uses to
`SmallVec<[T; 1]>`. It also reorders the `use` items in the relevant
file so they are in just two sections (`pub` and non-`pub`), ordered
alphabetically, instead of many sections. (This is a relevant part of
the change because I had to decide where to add a `use` item for
`SmallVec`.)
And move the `repr` line after the `derive` line, where it's harder to
overlook. (I overlooked it initially, and didn't understand how this
type worked.)
