Respect visibility & stability of inherent associated types
As discussed in #103621, this probably won't be the final location of the code that resolves inherent associated types. Still, I think it's valuable to push correctness fixes for this feature (in regards to visibility and stability).
Let me know if I should write a translatable diagnostic instead and if I should move the tests to `privacy/` and `stability-attribute/` respectively.
Fixes#104243.
````@rustbot```` label A-visibility F-inherent_associated_types
r? ````@cjgillot```` (since you reviewed #103621, feel free to reroll though)
interpret: support for per-byte provenance
Also factors the provenance map into its own module.
The third commit does the same for the init mask. I can move it in a separate PR if you prefer.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2181
r? `@oli-obk`
Add `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`
Also adjust `E0322` error message to be more general, since it's used for `DiscriminantKind` and `Pointee` as well.
Also add `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` on the `Tuple` and `Destruct` marker traits.
Emit error in `collecting_trait_impl_trait_tys` on mismatched signatures
Previously, a `delay_span_bug` was isssued, failing normalization. This create a `TyKind::Error` in the signature, which caused `compare_predicate_entailment` to swallow its signature mismatch error, causing ICEs because no error was emitted.
fixes#104183
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Resolve lifetimes independently for each item-like.
Now that the heavy-lifting is done on the AST and during lowering, we do not need to perform HIR lifetime resolution on a full item at once. Instead, we can treat each item-like independently, and look at `generics_of` the parent exceptionally for associated items.
Cleanups in autoderef impl
Just something I noticed. Turns out the `overloaded_span` is not actually used separately from the main span, so I merged them.
Previously, a `delay_span_bug` was isssued, failing normalization. This
create a `TyKind::Error` in the signature, which caused
`compare_predicate_entailment` to swallow its signature mismatch error,
causing ICEs because no error was emitted.
Remove allow(rustc::potential_query_instability) in rustc_trait_selection
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84447
This PR needs to be benchmarked to check for regressions.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100508 (avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args)
- #101381 (Test that target feature mix up with homogeneous floats is sound)
- #103353 (Fix Access Violation when using lld & ThinLTO on windows-msvc)
- #103521 (Avoid possible infinite loop when next_point reaching the end of file)
- #103559 (first move on a nested span_label)
- #103778 (Update several crates for improved support of the new targets)
- #103827 (Properly remap and check for substs compatibility in `confirm_impl_trait_in_trait_candidate`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
avoid making substs of type aliases late bound when used as fn args
fixes#47511fixes#85533
(although I did not know theses issues existed when i was working on this 🙃)
currently `Alias<...>` is treated the same as `Struct<...>` when deciding if generics should be late bound or early bound but this is not correct as `Alias` might normalize to a projection which does not constrain the generics.
I think this needs more tests before merging
more explanation of PR [here](https://hackmd.io/v44a-QVjTIqqhK9uretyQg?view)
Hackmd inline for future readers:
---
This assumes reader is familiar with the concept of early/late bound lifetimes. There's a section on rustc-dev-guide if not (although i think some details are a bit out of date)
## problem & background
Not all lifetimes on a fn can be late bound:
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef {
type Output = &'a (); // uh oh unconstrained lifetime
}
```
so we make make them early bound
```rust
fn foo<'a>() -> &'a ();
impl<'a> Fn<()> for FooFnDef<'a> {// wow look at all that lifetimey
type Output = &'a ();
}
```
(Closures have the same constraint however it is not enforced leading to soundness bugs, [#84385](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84385) implements this "downgrading late bound to early bound" for closures)
lifetimes on fn items are only late bound when they are "constrained" by the fn args:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(_: &'a ()) -> &'a ();
// late bound, not present on `FooFnItem`
// vv
impl<'a> Trait<(&'a (),)> for FooFnItem {
type Output = &'a ();
}
// projections do not constrain inputs
fn bar<'a, T: Trait>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) -> &'a (); // early bound
// vv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for BarFnItem<'a, T> {
type Output = &'a ();
}
```
current logic for determining if inputs "constrain" a lifetime works off of HIR so does not normalize aliases. It also assumes that any path with no self type constrains all its substs (i.e. `Foo<'a, u32>` has no self type but `T::Assoc` does). This falls apart for top level type aliases (see linked issues):
```rust
type Alias<'a, T> = <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc;
// wow look its a path with no self type uwu
// i bet that constrains `'a` so it should be latebound
// vvvvvvvvvvv
fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();
// `Alias` normalized to make things clearer
// vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
impl<'a, T: Trait> Fn<(<T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc,)> for FooFnDef<T> {
type Output = &'a ();
// oh no `'a` isnt constrained wah wah waaaah *trumbone noises*
// i think, idk what musical instrument that is
}
```
## solution
The PR solves this by having the hir visitor that checks for lifetimes in constraining uses check if the path is a `DefKind::Alias`. If it is we ""normalize"" it by calling `type_of` and walking the returned type. This is a bit hacky as it requires a mapping between the substs on the path in hir, and the generics of the `type Alias<...>` which is on the ty layer.
Alternative solutions may involve calculating the "late boundness" of lifetimes after/during astconv rather than relying on hir at all. We already have code to determine whether a lifetime SHOULD be late bound or not as this is currently how the error for `fn foo<'a, T: Trait>(_: Alias<'a, T>) -> &'a ();` gets emitted.
It is probably not possible to do this right now, late boundness is used by `generics_of` and `gather_explicit_predicates_of` as we currently do not put late bound lifetimes in `Generics`. Although this seems sus to me as the long term goal is to make all generics late bound which would result in `generics_of(function)` being empty? [#103448](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103448) places all lifetimes in `Generics` regardless of late boundness so that may be a good step towards making this possible.
Better error for HRTB error from generator interior
cc #100013
This is just a first pass at an error. It could be better, and shouldn't really be emitted in the first place. But this is better than what was being emitted before.
Make InferCtxtExt use a FxIndexMap
This should be faster, because the map is only being used to iterate,
which is supposed to be faster with the IndexMap
Make the user_computed_preds use an IndexMap
It is being used mostly for iteration, so the change shouldn't result in
a perf hit
Make the RegionDeps fields use an IndexMap
This change could be a perf hit. Both `larger` and `smaller` are used
for iteration, but they are also used for insertions.
Make types_without_default_bounds use an IndexMap
It uses extend, but it also iterates and removes items. Not sure if
this will be a perf hit.
Make InferTtxt.reported_trait_errors use an IndexMap
This change brought a lot of other changes. The map seems to have been
mostly used for iteration, so the performance shouldn't suffer.
Add FIXME to change ProvisionalEvaluationCache.map to use an IndexMap
Right now this results in a perf hit. IndexMap doesn't have
the `drain_filter` API, so in `on_completion` we now need to iterate two
times over the map.
Implement `std::marker::Tuple`, use it in `extern "rust-call"` and `Fn`-family traits
Implements rust-lang/compiler-team#537
I made a few opinionated decisions in this implementation, specifically:
1. Enforcing `extern "rust-call"` on fn items during wfcheck,
2. Enforcing this for all functions (not just ones that have bodies),
3. Gating this `Tuple` marker trait behind its own feature, instead of grouping it into (e.g.) `unboxed_closures`.
Still needing to be done:
1. Enforce that `extern "rust-call"` `fn`-ptrs are well-formed only if they have 1/2 args and the second one implements `Tuple`. (Doing this would fix ICE in #66696.)
2. Deny all explicit/user `impl`s of the `Tuple` trait, kinda like `Sized`.
3. Fixing `Tuple` trait built-in impl for chalk, so that chalkification tests are un-broken.
Open questions:
1. Does this need t-lang or t-libs signoff?
Fixes#99820
Fix late-bound lifetime closure ICEs in HIR typeck and MIR borrowck
During HIR typeck, we need to teach astconv to treat late-bound regions within a closure body as free, fixing escaping bound vars ICEs in both of the issues below.
However, this then gets us to MIR borrowck, which itself needs to be taught how to instantiate free region vids for late-bound regions that come from items that _aren't_ the typeck root (for now, just closures).
Fixes#103771Fixes#103736
fix(generic_const_exprs): Fix predicate inheritance for children of opaque types
Fixes#99705
We currently have a special case to perform predicate inheritance when the const item is in the generics. I think we're also going to need this for opaque return types. When evaluating the predicates applied to the associated item, it'll inherit from its parent, the opaque type, which will never have predicates applied. This PR bypass the opaque typed parent and inherit predicates directly from the function itself.
Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
Track where diagnostics were created.
This implements the `-Ztrack-diagnostics` flag, which uses `#[track_caller]` to track where diagnostics are created. It is meant as a debugging tool much like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`.
For example, the following code...
```rust
struct A;
struct B;
fn main(){
let _: A = B;
}
```
...now emits the following error message:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src\main.rs:5:16
|
5 | let _: A = B;
| - ^ expected struct `A`, found struct `B`
| |
| expected due to this
-Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler\rustc_infer\src\infer\error_reporting\mod.rs:2275:31
```
(almost) Always use `ObligationCtxt` when dealing with canonical queries
Hope this is a step in the right direction. cc rust-lang/types-team#50.
r? `@lcnr`
Enable varargs support for calling conventions other than C or cdecl
This patch makes it possible to use varargs for calling conventions,
which are either based on C (efiapi) or C is based on them (sysv64 and win64).
Also pinging ``@phlopsi,`` because he noticed first this oversight when writing a library for UEFI.
Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions
Functions in answer:
- `Ty::is_freeze`
- `Ty::is_sized`
- `Ty::is_unpin`
- `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
This allows to remove a lot of useless `.at(DUMMY_SP)`, making the code a bit nicer :3
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rename some `OwnerId` fields.
`@spastorino` noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of `def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left that alone.
r? `@compiler-errors`
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
Note scope of TAIT more accurately
This maybe explains why the person was confused in #101897, since we say "same module" but really should've said "same impl".
r? ``@oli-obk``
Introduce UnordMap, UnordSet, and UnordBag (MCP 533)
This is the start of implementing [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
I followed `@eddyb's` suggestion of naming the collection types `Unord(Map/Set/Bag)` which is a bit easier to type than `Unordered(Map/Set/Bag)`
r? `@eddyb`
Emit a nicer error on `impl Self {`
currently it emits a "cycle detected error" but this PR makes it emit a more user friendly error specifically saying that `Self` is disallowed in that position. this is a pretty hacky fix so i dont expect this to be merged (I basically only made this PR because i wanted to see if CI passes)
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Remap early bound lifetimes in return-position `impl Trait` in traits too
Fixes part of #103457
r? ``@cjgillot,`` though feel free to reassign, just thought you'd have sufficient context to review.
Add suggestions for unsafe impl error codes
Adds suggestions for users to add `unsafe` to trait impls that should be `unsafe`, and remove `unsafe` from trait impls that do not require `unsafe`
With the folllowing code:
```rust
struct Foo {}
struct Bar {}
trait Safe {}
unsafe trait Unsafe {}
impl Safe for Foo {} // ok
impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
unsafe impl Unsafe for Bar {} // ok
// omitted empty main fn
```
The current rustc output is:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
With this PR, the future rustc output would be:
```
error[E0199]: implementing the trait `Safe` is not unsafe
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:13:1
|
13 | unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: remove `unsafe` from this trait implementation
|
13 - unsafe impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
13 + impl Safe for Bar {} // E0199
|
error[E0200]: the trait `Unsafe` requires an `unsafe impl` declaration
--> ../../temp/e0200.rs:11:1
|
11 | impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the trait `Unsafe` enforces invariants that the compiler can't check. Review the trait documentation and make sure this implementation upholds those invariants before adding the `unsafe` keyword
help: add `unsafe` to this trait implementation
|
11 | unsafe impl Unsafe for Foo {} // E0200
| ++++++
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0199, E0200.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0199`.
```
``@rustbot`` label +T-compiler +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics
