Avoid use of LFS64 symbols on Emscripten
Since Emscripten uses musl libc internally.
Non-functional change: all LFS64 symbols were aliased to their non-LFS64 counterparts in rust-lang/libc@7c952dceaa.
Not all targets support these flags, so we cannot just pass them to the tests unconditionally. Before, we were using a linker arg (`-Clink-arg=-fuse-ld=lld`), which circumvented this in a hacky way.
Run Python formatting check in tidy on CI
I don't think that there's a reason why we should ignore Python formatting on CI, when we already check Python lints and C++ formatting.
r? `@onur-ozkan`
Since Emscripten uses musl libc internally.
Non-functional change: all LFS64 symbols were aliased to their non-LFS64
counterparts in rust-lang/libc@7c952dceaa.
char to_digit: avoid unnecessary casts to u64
Hello,
in the `char::to_digit` method there are a few `as u64` casts that are not strictly necessary.
I assume that the reason behind these casts is to avoid possible overflows in the `+ 10` add.
This PR removes the aforementioned casts, avoiding the overflow issue by slightly modifying the ASCII letter to int mapping.
Thanks,
Happy new year.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #131439 (Remove allowing static_mut_refs lint)
- #133292 (E0277: suggest dereferencing function arguments in more cases)
- #134877 (add suggestion for wrongly ordered format parameters)
- #134945 (Some small nits to the borrowck suggestions for mutating a map through index)
- #134950 (bootstrap: Overhaul and simplify the `tool_check_step!` macro)
- #134979 (Provide structured suggestion for `impl Default` of type where all fields have defaults)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Provide structured suggestion for `impl Default` of type where all fields have defaults
```
error: `Default` impl doesn't use the declared default field values
--> $DIR/manual-default-impl-could-be-derived.rs:28:1
|
LL | / impl Default for B {
LL | | fn default() -> Self {
LL | | B {
LL | | x: s(),
| | --- this field has a default value
LL | | y: 0,
| | - this field has a default value
... |
LL | | }
| |_^
|
help: to avoid divergence in behavior between `Struct { .. }` and `<Struct as Default>::default()`, derive the `Default`
|
LL ~ #[derive(Default)] struct B {
|
```
Note that above the structured suggestion also includes completely removing the manual `impl`, but the rendering doesn't.
bootstrap: Overhaul and simplify the `tool_check_step!` macro
Main changes:
- Pull most of `run` out of the macro and into a regular helper function
- Reduce the number of redundant/unnecessary macro arguments
- Switch to struct-like syntax so that optional arguments are clearer, and so that rustfmt is happy
~~The one “functional” change is that the `-check.stamp` files now get their name from the final path segment, instead of the struct name; in practice this means that they now contain more hyphens in some cases. As far as I'm aware, the exact filename doesn't matter so this should be fine.~~ (that change has been removed from this PR)
Some small nits to the borrowck suggestions for mutating a map through index
1. Suggesting users to either use `.insert` or `.get_mut` (which do totally different things) can be a bit of a footgun, so let's make that a bit more nuanced.
2. I find the suggestion of `.get_mut(|val| { *val = whatever; })` to be a bit awkward. I changed this to be an if-let instead.
3. Fix a bug which was suppressing the structured suggestion for some mutations via the index operator on `HashMap`/`BTreeMap`.
r? estebank or reassign
E0277: suggest dereferencing function arguments in more cases
This unifies and generalizes some of the logic in `TypeErrCtxt::suggest_dereferences` so that it will suggest dereferencing arguments to function/method calls in order to satisfy trait bounds in more cases.
Previously it would only fire on reference types, and it had two separate cases (one specifically to get through custom `Deref` impls when passing by-reference, and one specifically to catch #87437). I've based the new checks loosely on what's done for `E0308` in `FnCtxt::suggest_deref_or_ref`: it will suggest dereferences to satisfy trait bounds whenever the referent is `Copy`, is boxed (& so can be moved out of the boxes), or is being passed by reference.
This doesn't make the suggestion fire in contexts other than function arguments or binary operators (which are in a separate case that this doesn't touch), and doesn't make it suggest a combination of `&`-removal and dereferences. Those would require a bit more restructuring, so I figured just doing this would be a decent first step.
Closes#90997
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132474 (Add more mailmap entries)
- #133486 (borrowck diagnostics: make `add_move_error_suggestions` use the HIR rather than `SourceMap`)
- #134861 (Add GUI test for item info elements color)
- #134968 (Print how to rebless Python formatting in tidy)
- #134971 (chore: fix typos)
- #134972 (add .mailmap entry for myself)
- #134974 (Revert #119515 single line where clause style guide)
- #134975 (Revert style guide rhs break)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert #119515 single line where clause style guide
This did not get implemented for the style edition in 2024, so this PR removes it from the documentation.
See tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132381.
This can be added back in the next edition if it gets implemented. I'm a little unclear on what the style team intends for how future changes are documented. For example, the current style-guide documented behavior that rustfmt does not support. I'm not sure who the audience for this document is, or how this is intended to stay in sync with rustfmt. For example, if I read this and assume this is how it is supposed to work, and then rustfmt breaks that, it seems like that is confusing. Similarly, if I'm staying on an older edition, this documentation would be incorrect for my crate.
Perhaps changes like this could be "teed-up" in a PR, but not merged until the edition is stabilized (similar to how the reference works)? And include notes for parts that are edition-specific (so if I am using an older edition, I can see that something is different). In general, I'm a little confused on how this is intended to work.
Reverts:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119515
add .mailmap entry for myself
Seeing #132474 in the bors queue I decided to check myself and noticed I was listed four times.
This fixed that by cannonicalizing all entries to use my username and the github no-reply email address, rather than some combination of name or username and different email addresses.
borrowck diagnostics: make `add_move_error_suggestions` use the HIR rather than `SourceMap`
This PR aims to fix#132806 by rewriting `add_move_error_suggestions`[^1]. Previously, it manually scanned the source text to find a leading `&`, which isn't always going to produce a correct result (see: that issue). Admittedly, the HIR visitor in this PR introduces a lot of boilerplate, but hopefully the logic at its core isn't too complicated (I go over it in the comments). I also tried a simpler version that didn't use a HIR visitor and suggested adding `ref` always, but the `&ref x` suggestions really didn't look good. As a bonus for the added complexity though, it's now able to produce nice `&`-removing suggestions in more cases.
I tried to do this such that it avoids edition-dependent checks and its suggestions can be applied together with those from the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint. I haven't added tests for that since the details of match ergonomics 2024 are still being sorted out, but I can try if desired once that's finalized.
[^1]: In brief, it fires on patterns where users try to bind by-value in such a way that moves out of a reference to a non-Copy type (including slice references with non-copy elements). The suggestions are to change the binding's mode to be by-reference, either by removing[^2] an enclosing `&`/`&mut` or adding `ref` to the binding.
[^2]: Incidentally, I find the terminology of "consider removing the borrow" a bit confusing for a suggestion to remove a `&` pattern in order to make bindings borrow rather than move. I'm not sure what a good, concise way to explain that would be though, and that should go in a separate PR anyway.
Add more mailmap entries
If you have been pinged: I'm adding a mailmap entry for you to keep thanks.rust-lang.org working properly.
**I have picked the canonical address mostly arbitrarily. If you want a different one as the canonical address, please tell me here**.
<details>
<summary>more details on the change</summary>
builds on top of #132471, this containing the less obvious changes that add new canonical email addresses instead of just adding new current ones.
The people updated in this commit have contributed under different email
addresses than the ones they have used in rust-lang/team.
https://github.com/rust-lang/thanks/pull/53 will use team data for thanks reviewers, which requires this to be in
sync.
Therefore, I have updated many of the people that I've noticed being
duplicated after the change.
</details>
I'm adding a novel entry for you: ``@apiraino`` ``@KodrAus`` ``@cramertj`` ``@sunfishcode`` ``@Eh2406`` ``@skade`` ``@huonw`` ``@jsha`` ``@shepmaster`` ``@workingjubilee`` ``@rbtcollins`` ``@nrc`` ``@fitzgen`` ``@sophiajt`` ``@tmiasko`` ``@notriddle`` ``@TimNN`` ``@WaffleLapkin``
Tidy up bigint multiplication methods
This tidies up the library version of the bigint multiplication methods after the addition of the intrinsics in #133663. It follows [this summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85532#issuecomment-2403442775) of what's desired for these methods.
Note that, if `2H = N`, then `uH::MAX * uH::MAX + uH::MAX + uH::MAX` is `uN::MAX`, and that we can effectively add two "carry" values without overflowing.
For ease of terminology, the "low-order" or "least significant" or "wrapping" half of multiplication will be called the low part, and the "high-order" or "most significant" or "overflowing" half of multiplication will be called the high part. In all cases, the return convention is `(low, high)` and left unchanged by this PR, to be litigated later.
## API Changes
The original API:
```rust
impl uN {
// computes self * rhs
pub const fn widening_mul(self, rhs: uN) -> (uN, uN);
// computes self * rhs + carry
pub const fn carrying_mul(self, rhs: uN, carry: uN) -> (uN, uN);
}
```
The added API:
```rust
impl uN {
// computes self * rhs + carry1 + carry2
pub const fn carrying2_mul(self, rhs: uN, carry: uN, add: uN) -> (uN, uN);
}
impl iN {
// note that the low part is unsigned
pub const fn widening_mul(self, rhs: iN) -> (uN, iN);
pub const fn carrying_mul(self, rhs: iN, carry: iN) -> (uN, iN);
pub const fn carrying_mul_add(self, rhs: iN, carry: iN, add: iN) -> (uN, iN);
}
```
Additionally, a naive implementation has been added for `u128` and `i128` since there are no double-wide types for those. Eventually, an intrinsic will be added to make these more efficient, but rather than doing this all at once, the library changes are added first.
## Justifications for API
The unsigned parts are done to ensure consistency with overflowing addition: for a two's complement integer, you want to have unsigned overflow semantics for all parts of the integer except the highest one. This is because overflow for unsigned integers happens on the highest bit (from `MAX` to zero), whereas overflow for signed integers happens on the second highest bit (from `MAX` to `MIN`). Since the sign information only matters in the highest part, we use unsigned overflow for everything but that part.
There is still discussion on the merits of signed bigint *addition* methods, since getting the behaviour right is very subtle, but at least for signed bigint *multiplication*, the sign of the operands does make a difference. So, it feels appropriate that at least until we've nailed down the final API, there should be an option to do signed versions of these methods.
Additionally, while it's unclear whether we need all three versions of bigint multiplication (widening, carrying-1, and carrying-2), since it's possible to have up to two carries without overflow, there should at least be a method to allow that. We could potentially only offer the carry-2 method and expect that adding zero carries afterword will optimise correctly, but again, this can be litigated before stabilisation.
## Note on documentation
While a lot of care was put into the documentation for the `widening_mul` and `carrying_mul` methods on unsigned integers, I have not taken this same care for `carrying_mul_add` or the signed versions. While I have updated the doc tests to be more appropriate, there will likely be many documentation changes done before stabilisation.
## Note on tests
Alongside this change, I've added several tests to ensure that these methods work as expected. These are alongside the codegen tests for the intrinsics.
```
error: `Default` impl doesn't use the declared default field values
--> $DIR/manual-default-impl-could-be-derived.rs:28:1
|
LL | / impl Default for B {
LL | | fn default() -> Self {
LL | | B {
LL | | x: s(),
| | --- this field has a default value
LL | | y: 0,
| | - this field has a default value
... |
LL | | }
| |_^
|
help: to avoid divergence in behavior between `Struct { .. }` and `<Struct as Default>::default()`, derive the `Default`
|
LL ~ #[derive(Default)] struct B {
|
```
Note that above the structured suggestion also includes completely removing the manual `impl`, but the rendering doesn't.
