Add more `begin_panic` normalizations to panic backtrace tests
Since #123244, these tests have started failing locally on some systems (#133997) due to minor variations in how `begin_panic` is printed in the backtrace.
The variation appears to occur on macOS when `rust.debuginfo-level = "line-tables-only"` is set, which is the default in `config.compiler.toml`. It does not occur when the debuginfo level is set to 1.
The variation doesn't seem relevant to these tests, so this PR simply adds another custom normalization rule to account for the variation.
---
Will conflict with #134759.
Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` to rmake
This PR partially supersedes #128562, and ports the Makefile-based `tests/run-make/incr-add-rust-src-component` to use rmake.rs infra.
Part of #121876.
This run-make test is a regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70924. It (tries to) checks that if we add the `rust-src` component in between two incremental compiles, that the compiler doesn't ICE on the second invocation.
- Original issue:https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70924
- Fix PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72767
- PR adding this regression test: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72952
However, the Makefile version of this used `$SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/src/libstd/lib.rs`, but that actually got moved around and reorganized over the years. As of Dec 2024, the `rust-src` component is more like (specific for our purposes):
```
$SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/
library/std/src/lib.rs
src/
```
However, this run-make test is ancient and it exercises incr-comp system logic. I'm not sure if this test would actually catch the original regression.
This PR was co-authored with `@Oneirical.`
r? incremental
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: aarch64-apple
fix default-backtrace-ice test
when running `tests/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice.rs locally it gave this error:
```
failures:
---- [ui] tests/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice.rs stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to "/home/jyn/src/rust3/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice/default-backtrace-ice.stderr"
diff of stderr:
7
8 aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`
9 stack backtrace:
- (end_short_backtrace)
- (begin_short_backtrace)
- (end_short_backtrace)
- (begin_short_backtrace)
+ [... omitted 22 frames ...]
+
```
(note that you must *not* use --bless; we previously did not have an error annotation to verify it was a full backtrace instead of a short backtrace.)
this is a regression from setting RUST_BACKTRACE=1 by default in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134743. we need to turn off the new behavior when running UI tests so that they reflect our dist compiler. normally that's done by checking `sess.unstable_opts.ui_testing`, but this happens extremely early in the compiler before we've expanded arg files. do an extremely simple hack that doesn't work in all cases - we don't need it to work in all cases, only when running UI tests.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129658#issuecomment-2561988081
r? `@jieyouxu`
when running `tests/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice.rs locally it gave this error:
```
failures:
---- [ui] tests/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice.rs stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to "/home/jyn/src/rust3/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/panics/default-backtrace-ice/default-backtrace-ice.stderr"
diff of stderr:
7
8 aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`
9 stack backtrace:
- (end_short_backtrace)
- (begin_short_backtrace)
- (end_short_backtrace)
- (begin_short_backtrace)
+ [... omitted 22 frames ...]
+
```
this is a regression from setting RUST_BACKTRACE=1 by default. we need to turn off the new behavior when running UI tests so that they reflect our dist compiler. normally that's done by checking `sess.unstable_opts.ui_testing`, but this happens extremely early in the compiler before we've expanded arg files. do an extremely simple hack that doesn't work in all cases - we don't need it to work in all cases, only when running UI tests.
Detect when a manual `Default` implementation isn't using the existing default field values and suggest using `..` instead:
```
error: `Default` impl doesn't use the declared default field values
--> $DIR/manual-default-impl-could-be-derived.rs:14:1
|
LL | / impl Default for A {
LL | | fn default() -> Self {
LL | | A {
LL | | y: 0,
| | - this field has a default value
... |
LL | | }
| |_^
|
= help: use the default values in the `impl` with `Struct { mandatory_field, .. }` to avoid them diverging over time
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/manual-default-impl-could-be-derived.rs:5:9
|
LL | #![deny(default_overrides_default_fields)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Run `tests/ui/backtrace/std-backtrace.rs` on MSVC.
The original PR which disabled these, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62897, only mentions them being broken on i686. ~~let's still make sure the rest of windows is supported.~~ Let's see if we can enable this for msvc now (32-bit and 64-bit).
r? `@jieyouxu`
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: i686-mingw
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-2
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-i686-msvc
The original PR which disabled these only mentions them being broken on
i686 msvc. Let's try to see if we can reenable this test for msvc (both
32-bit and 64-bit).
Update `#[coverage(..)]` attribute error messages to match the current implementation
The allowed positions for `#[coverage(..)]` attributes were expanded by #126721, but the corresponding error messages were never updated to reflect the new behaviour.
Part of #134749.
Consider arm to diverge if guard diverges
This is not a fix for #134734, but I discovered it when I was gauging how difficult it would be to fix that. It does fix a really old test though :>
r? `@WaffleLapkin` or reassign
Correctly note item kind in `NonConstFunctionCall` error message
Don't just call everything a "`fn`". This is more consistent with the error message we give for conditionally-const items, which do note the item's def kind.
r? fmease, this is a prerequisite for making those `~const PartialEq` error messages better. Re-roll if you're busy or don't want to review this.
core: fix const ptr::swap_nonoverlapping when there are pointers at odd offsets
Ensure that the pointer gets swapped correctly even if it is not stored at an aligned offset. This rules out implementations that copy things in a `usize` loop -- so our implementation needs to be adjusted to avoid such a loop when running in const context.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133668
Begin to implement type system layer of unsafe binders
Mostly TODOs, but there's a lot of match arms that are basically just noops so I wanted to split these out before I put up the MIR lowering/projection part of this logic.
r? oli-obk
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130516
Clean up a few rmake tests
Now I'm aware it's a bit late to start participating in the Advent of Tests, but here are a few cleanups in the rmake tests to put under the 🎄 anyways. A handful of unused imports, some warnings, and a couple typos.
r? `@jieyouxu` 🎅
opt-dist: propagate channel info to bootstrap
Fixes#133503.
Previously, `tests/ui/bootstrap/rustc_bootstap.rs` [sic] failed during [beta bump](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133447#issuecomment-2501298794) in opt-dist tests. This is because:
- `opt-dist` tried to run `./x test` against beta-channel dist `rustc` through `bootstrap`.
- The dist build produced during the beta bump produces a `rustc` which correctly thinks that it is a beta compiler based on `src/ci/channel` info.
- `opt-dist` tries to run `./x test` on the beta `rustc` from the dist build, but without specifying channel through a synthetic `config.toml`, so `bootstrap` tells `compiletest` that we're on the `nightly` channel (by default).
- Now there's a channel mismatch: `compiletest` believes the `rustc` under test is a *nightly* rustc, but the `rustc` under test actually considers itself a *beta* rustc. This means that `//@ only-nightly` will be satisfied yet the test will fail as the *beta* rustc is not a *nightly* rustc.
This PR:
- Fixes the test failure during beta bump (i.e. #133503) by having `opt-dist` faithfully report the channel of the dist `rustc` being tested (i.e. "beta" in a beta bump PR). This will properly make the test be ignored during beta bump as the `rustc` under test is not a *nightly* rustc.
- Fixes the test name `rustc_bootstap.rs` -> `rustc_bootstrap.rs`. No more stapping.
- Slightly adjusts the doc comment in the test to make it more clear.
I ran a try-job against the beta branch (explicitly running the opt-dist tests by modifying the job definition) with these changes in #134131, and it appears that the try-job was [successful](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134131#issuecomment-2555492215). The two commits in this PR are cherry-picked from #134131, with the test commit slightly modified (to also adjust the test comments).
r? `@Kobzol` (or compiler or bootstrap or infra I guess?)
The Makefile version seems to contain a bug. Over the years, the
directory structure of the `rust-src` component changed as the source
tree directory structure changed. `libstd` is no longer a thing directly
under `root/lib/rustlib/src/rust/src/`, it is moved to
`root/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std`.
Co-authored-by: Oneirical <manchot@videotron.ca>
Revert stabilization of the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute
Due to a process mixup, the PR to stabilize the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute (#130766) was merged while there are still outstanding concerns. The default action in that situation is to revert, and the feature is not sufficiently urgent or uncontroversial to justify special treatment, so this PR reverts that stabilization.
---
- A key point that came up in offline discussions is that unlike most user-facing features, this one never had a proper RFC, so parts of the normal stabilization process that implicitly rely on an RFC break down in this case.
- As the implementor and de-facto owner of the feature in its current form, I would like to think that I made good choices in designing and implementing it, but I don't feel comfortable proceeding to stabilization without further scrutiny.
- There hasn't been a clear opportunity for T-compiler to weigh in or express concerns prior to stabilization.
- The stabilization PR cites a T-lang FCP that occurred in the tracking issue, but due to the messy design and implementation history (and lack of a clear RFC), it's unclear what that FCP approval actually represents in this case.
- At the very least, we should not proceed without a clear statement from T-lang or the relevant members about the team's stance on this feature, especially in light of the other concerns listed here.
- The existing user-facing documentation doesn't clearly reflect which parts of the feature are stable commitments, and which parts are subject to change. And there doesn't appear to be a clear consensus anywhere about where that line is actually drawn, or whether the chosen boundary is acceptable to the relevant teams and individuals.
- For example, the [stabilization report comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84605#issuecomment-2166514660) mentions that some aspects are subject to change, but that text isn't consistent with my earlier comments, and there doesn't appear to have been any explicit discussion or approval process.
- [The current reference text](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/blob/4dfaa4f/src/attributes/coverage-instrumentation.md) doesn't mention this distinction at all, and instead simply describes the current implementation behaviour.
- When the implementation was changed to its current form, the associated user-facing error messages were not updated, so they still refer to the attribute only being allowed on functions and closures.
- On its own, this might have been reasonable to fix-forward in the absence of other concerns, but the fact that it never came up earlier highlights the breakdown in process that has occurred here.
---
Apologies to everyone who was excited for this stabilization to land, but unfortunately it simply isn't ready yet.
Add `ignore-rustc-debug-assertions` to `tests/ui/associated-consts/issue-93775.rs`
Closes#132111. Closes#133432.
I think this test case is flaky because the recursive calls happen to hit the upper limit of the call stack.
IMO, this may not be an issue, as it's reasonable for overly complex code to require additional build configurations (such as increasing the call stack size).
After set `rust.debug-assertions` is true, the test case requires a larger call stack, so disable it on `rust.debug-assertions=true`.
r? jieyouxu
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130289 (docs: Permissions.readonly() also ignores root user special permissions)
- #134583 (docs: `transmute<&mut T, &mut MaybeUninit<T>>` is unsound when exposed to safe code)
- #134611 (Align `{i686,x86_64}-win7-windows-msvc` to their parent targets)
- #134629 (compiletest: Allow using a specific debugger when running debuginfo tests)
- #134642 (Implement `PointerLike` for `isize`, `NonNull`, `Cell`, `UnsafeCell`, and `SyncUnsafeCell`.)
- #134660 (Fix spacing of markdown code block fences in compiler rustdoc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement `PointerLike` for `isize`, `NonNull`, `Cell`, `UnsafeCell`, and `SyncUnsafeCell`.
* Implementing `PointerLike` for `UnsafeCell` enables the possibility of interior mutable `dyn*` values. Since this means potentially exercising new codegen behavior, I added a test for it in `tests/ui/dyn-star/cell.rs`. Please let me know if there are further sorts of tests that should be written, or other care that should be taken with this change.
It is unfortunately not possible without compiler changes to implement `PointerLike` for `Atomic*` types, since they are not `repr(transparent)` (and, in theory if not in practice, `AtomicUsize`'s alignment may be greater than that of an ordinary pointer or `usize`).
* Implementing `PointerLike` for `NonNull` is useful for pointer types which wrap `NonNull`.
* Implementing `PointerLike` for `isize` is just for completeness; I have no use cases in mind, but I cannot think of any reason not to do this.
* Tracking issue: #102425
`@rustbot` label +F-dyn_star
(there is no label or tracking issue for F-pointer_like_trait)
Implementing `PointerLike` for `UnsafeCell` enables the possibility of
interior mutable `dyn*` values. Since this means potentially exercising
new codegen behavior, I added a test for it in `tests/ui/dyn-star/cell.rs`.
Also updated UI tests to account for the `isize` implementation changing
error messages.
Delete `Rvalue::Len` 🎉
Everything's moved to `PtrMetadata`, so we can get rid of the `Len` variant now.
~~Depends on #134326, so draft until that lands~~ Ready!
r? mir
Asserts the maximum value that can be returned from `Vec::len`
Currently, casting `Vec<i32>` to `Vec<u32>` takes O(1) time:
```rust
// See <https://godbolt.org/z/hxq3hnYKG> for assembly output.
pub fn cast(vec: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<u32> {
vec.into_iter().map(|e| e as _).collect()
}
```
But the generated assembly is not the same as the identity function, which prevents us from casting `Vec<Vec<i32>>` to `Vec<Vec<u32>>` within O(1) time:
```rust
// See <https://godbolt.org/z/7n48bxd9f> for assembly output.
pub fn cast(vec: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<Vec<u32>> {
vec.into_iter()
.map(|e| e.into_iter().map(|e| e as _).collect())
.collect()
}
```
This change tries to fix the problem. You can see the comparison here: <https://godbolt.org/z/jdManrKvx>.
Use `PtrMetadata` instead of `Len` in slice drop shims
I tried to do a bigger change in #134297 which didn't work, so here's the part I really wanted: Removing another use of `Len`, in favour of `PtrMetadata`.
Split into two commits where the first just adds a test, so you can look at the second commit to see how the drop shim for an array changes with this PR.
Reusing the same reviewer from the last one:
r? BoxyUwU
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134364 (Use E0665 for missing `#[default]` on enum and update doc)
- #134601 (Support pretty-printing `dyn*` trait objects)
- #134603 (Explain why a type is not eligible for `impl PointerLike`.)
- #134618 (coroutine_clone: add comments)
- #134630 (Use `&raw` for `ptr` primitive docs)
- #134637 (Flatten effects directory now that it doesn't really test anything specific)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Flatten effects directory now that it doesn't really test anything specific
These are just const trait tests now, after all.
There was one naming conflict between the aux-build `tests/ui/traits/const-traits/effects/auxiliary/cross-crate.rs` and `tests/ui/traits/const-traits/auxiliary/cross-crate.rs`. The former didn't really test anything useful since we no longer have an effect param, so I removed the test that owned it: `tests/ui/traits/const-traits/effects/no-explicit-const-params-cross-crate.rs`.
r? project-const-traits
coroutine_clone: add comments
I was very surprised to learn that coroutines can be cloned. This has non-trivial semantic consequences that I do not think have been considered. Lucky enough, it's still unstable. Let's add some comments and pointers so we hopefully become aware when a MIR opt actually is in conflict with this.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt`
Explain why a type is not eligible for `impl PointerLike`.
The rules were baffling when I ran in to them trying to add some impls (to `std`, not my own code, as it happens), so I made the compiler explain them to me.
The logic of the successful cases is unchanged, but I did rearrange it to reverse the order of the primitive and `Adt` cases; this makes producing the errors easier. I'm still not very familiar with `rustc` internals, so let me know if there's a better way to do any of this.
This also adds test coverage for which impls are accepted or rejected, which I didn't see any of already.
The PR template tells me I should consider mentioning a tracking issue, but there isn't one for `pointer_like_trait`, so I'll mention `dyn_star`: #102425
Use E0665 for missing `#[default]` on enum and update doc
The docs for E0665 when doing `#[derive(Default]` on an `enum` previously didn't mention `#[default]` at all, or made a distinction between unit variants, that can be annotated, and tuple or struct variants, which cannot.
E0665 was not being emitted, we now use it for the same error it belonged to before.
```
error[E0665]: `#[derive(Default)]` on enum with no `#[default]`
--> $DIR/macros-nonfatal-errors.rs:42:10
|
LL | #[derive(Default)]
| ^^^^^^^
LL | / enum NoDeclaredDefault {
LL | | Foo,
LL | | Bar,
LL | | }
| |_- this enum needs a unit variant marked with `#[default]`
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Default` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Foo,
| ++++++++++
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Bar,
| ++++++++++
```
Optimize `is_ascii` for `str` and `[u8]` further
Replace the existing optimized function with one that enables auto-vectorization.
This is especially beneficial on x86-64 as `pmovmskb` can be emitted with careful structuring of the code. The instruction can detect non-ASCII characters one vector register width at a time instead of the current `usize` at a time check.
The resulting implementation is completely safe.
`case00_libcore` is the current implementation, `case04_while_loop` is this PR.
```
benchmarks:
ascii::is_ascii_slice::long::case00_libcore 22.25/iter +/- 1.09
ascii::is_ascii_slice::long::case04_while_loop 6.78/iter +/- 0.92
ascii::is_ascii_slice::medium::case00_libcore 2.81/iter +/- 0.39
ascii::is_ascii_slice::medium::case04_while_loop 1.56/iter +/- 0.78
ascii::is_ascii_slice::short::case00_libcore 5.55/iter +/- 0.85
ascii::is_ascii_slice::short::case04_while_loop 3.75/iter +/- 0.22
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_both_long::case00_libcore 26.59/iter +/- 0.66
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_both_long::case04_while_loop 5.78/iter +/- 0.16
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_both_medium::case00_libcore 2.97/iter +/- 0.32
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_both_medium::case04_while_loop 2.41/iter +/- 0.10
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_head_long::case00_libcore 23.71/iter +/- 0.79
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_head_long::case04_while_loop 7.83/iter +/- 1.31
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_head_medium::case00_libcore 3.69/iter +/- 0.54
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_head_medium::case04_while_loop 7.05/iter +/- 0.32
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_tail_long::case00_libcore 24.44/iter +/- 1.41
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_tail_long::case04_while_loop 5.12/iter +/- 0.18
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_tail_medium::case00_libcore 3.24/iter +/- 0.40
ascii::is_ascii_slice::unaligned_tail_medium::case04_while_loop 2.86/iter +/- 0.14
```
`unaligned_head_medium` is the main regression in the benchmarks. It is a 32 byte string being sliced `bytes[1..]`.
The first commit can be used to run the benchmarks against the current core implementation.
Previous implementation was done in #74066
---
Two potential drawbacks of this implementation are that it increases instruction count and may regress other platforms/architectures. The benches here may also be too artificial to glean much insight from.
https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G9znGfY36
Use orphaned error code for the same error it belonged to before.
```
error[E0665]: `#[derive(Default)]` on enum with no `#[default]`
--> $DIR/macros-nonfatal-errors.rs:42:10
|
LL | #[derive(Default)]
| ^^^^^^^
LL | / enum NoDeclaredDefault {
LL | | Foo,
LL | | Bar,
LL | | }
| |_- this enum needs a unit variant marked with `#[default]`
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Default` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Foo,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Bar,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
Provide a fallback in `best_blame_constraint` when `find_constraint_paths_between_regions` doesn't have a result. This code is due a rework to avoid the letf-over `unwrap()`, but avoids the ICE caused by the repro.
Fix#133252.
Fix parenthesization of chained comparisons by pretty-printer
Example:
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
() => {
1 < 2
};
}
fn main() {
let _ = repro!() == false;
}
```
Previously `-Zunpretty=expanded` would pretty-print this syntactically invalid output: `fn main() { let _ = 1 < 2 == false; }`
```console
error: comparison operators cannot be chained
--> <anon>:8:23
|
8 | fn main() { let _ = 1 < 2 == false; }
| ^ ^^
|
help: parenthesize the comparison
|
8 | fn main() { let _ = (1 < 2) == false; }
| + +
```
With the fix, it will print `fn main() { let _ = (1 < 2) == false; }`.
Making `-Zunpretty=expanded` consistently produce syntactically valid Rust output is important because that is what makes it possible for `cargo expand` to format and perform filtering on the expanded code.
## Review notes
According to `rg '\.fixity\(\)' compiler/` the `fixity` function is called only 3 places:
- 13170cd787/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state/expr.rs (L283-L287)
- 13170cd787/compiler/rustc_hir_pretty/src/lib.rs (L1295-L1299)
- 13170cd787/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L282-L289)
The 2 pretty printers definitely want to treat comparisons using `Fixity::None`. That's the whole bug being fixed. Meanwhile, the parser's `Fixity::None` codepath is previously unreachable as indicated by the comment, so as long as `Fixity::None` here behaves exactly the way that `Fixity::Left` used to behave, you can tell that this PR definitely does not constitute any behavior change for the parser.
My guess for why comparison operators were set to `Fixity::Left` instead of `Fixity::None` is that it's a very old workaround for giving a good chained comparisons diagnostic (like what I pasted above). Nowadays that is handled by a different dedicated codepath.
Detect missing `.` in method chain in `let` bindings and statements
On parse errors where an ident is found where one wasn't expected, see if the next elements might have been meant as method call or field access.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found `map`
--> $DIR/missing-dot-on-statement-expression.rs:7:29
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter()map(|x| x);
| ^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: you might have meant to write a method call
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter().map(|x| x);
| +
```
The rules were baffling when I ran in to them trying to add some impls,
so I made the compiler explain them to me.
The logic of the successful cases is unchanged, but I did rearrange it
to reverse the order of the primitive and `Adt` cases; this makes
producing the errors easier.
On parse errors where an ident is found where one wasn't expected, see if the next elements might have been meant as method call or field access.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found `map`
--> $DIR/missing-dot-on-statement-expression.rs:7:29
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter()map(|x| x);
| ^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: you might have meant to write a method call
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter().map(|x| x);
| +
```
Also lint on option of function pointer comparisons
This PR is the first part of #134536, ie. the linting on `Option<{fn ptr}>` in the `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons` lint, which isn't part of the lang nomination that the second part is going trough, and so should be able to be approved independently.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134527
r? `@compiler-errors`
Restrict `#[non_exaustive]` on structs with default field values
Do not allow users to apply `#[non_exaustive]` to a struct when they have also used default field values.
Arbitrary self types v2: no deshadow pre feature.
The arbitrary self types v2 work introduces a check for shadowed methods, whereby a method in some "outer" smart pointer type may called in preference to a method in the inner referent. This is bad if the outer pointer adds a method later, as it may change behavior, so we ensure we error in this circumstance.
It was intended that this new shadowing detection system only comes into play for users who enable the `arbitrary_self_types` feature (or of course everyone later if it's stabilized). It was believed that the new deshadowing code couldn't be reached without building the custom smart pointers that `arbitrary_self_types` enables, and therefore there was no risk of this code impacting existing users.
However, it turns out that cunning use of `Pin::get_ref` can cause this type of shadowing error to be emitted now. This commit adds a test for this case.
As we want this test to pass without arbitrary_self_types, but fail with it, I've split it into two files (one with run-pass and one without). If there's a better way I can amend it.
Part of #44874
r? ```@wesleywiser```
Arbitrary self types v2: niche deshadowing test
Arbitrary self types v2 attempts to detect cases where methods in an "outer" type (e.g. a smart pointer) might "shadow" methods in the referent.
There are a couple of cases where the current code makes no attempt to detect such shadowing. Both of these cases only apply if other unstable features are enabled.
Add a test, mostly for illustrative purposes, so we can see the shadowing cases that can occur.
Part of #44874
r? ```@wesleywiser```
Precedence improvements: closures and jumps
This PR fixes some cases where rustc's pretty printers would redundantly parenthesize expressions that didn't need it.
<table>
<tr><th>Before</th><th>After</th></tr>
<tr><td><code>return (|x: i32| x)</code></td><td><code>return |x: i32| x</code></td></tr>
<tr><td><code>(|| -> &mut () { std::process::abort() }).clone()</code></td><td><code>|| -> &mut () { std::process::abort() }.clone()</code></td></tr>
<tr><td><code>(continue) + 1</code></td><td><code>continue + 1</code></td></tr>
</table>
Tested by `echo "fn main() { let _ = $AFTER; }" | rustc -Zunpretty=expanded /dev/stdin`.
The pretty-printer aims to render the syntax tree as it actually exists in rustc, as faithfully as possible, in Rust syntax. It can insert parentheses where forced by Rust's grammar in order to preserve the meaning of a macro-generated syntax tree, for example in the case of `a * $rhs` where $rhs is `b + c`. But for any expression parsed from source code, without a macro involved, there should never be a reason for inserting additional parentheses not present in the original.
For closures and jumps (return, break, continue, yield, do yeet, become) the unneeded parentheses came from the precedence of some of these expressions being misidentified. In the same order as the table above:
- Jumps and closures are supposed to have equal precedence. The [Rust Reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.83.0/reference/expressions.html#expression-precedence) says so, and in Syn they do. There is no Rust syntax that would require making a precedence distinction between jumps and closures. But in rustc these were previously 2 distinct levels with the closure being lower, hence the parentheses around a closure inside a jump (but not a jump inside a closure).
- When a closure is written with an explicit return type, the grammar [requires](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.83.0/reference/expressions/closure-expr.html) that the closure body consists of exactly one block expression, not any other arbitrary expression as usual for closures. Parsing of the closure body does not continue after the block expression. So in `|| { 0 }.clone()` the clone is inside the closure body and applies to `{ 0 }`, whereas in `|| -> _ { 0 }.clone()` the clone is outside and applies to the closure as a whole.
- Continue never needs parentheses. It was previously marked as having the lowest possible precedence but it should have been the highest, next to paths and loops and function calls, not next to jumps.
Add `--doctest-compilation-args` option to add compilation flags to doctest compilation
Fixes#67533.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134172
It's been something I meant to take a look at for a long time and actually completely forgot... The idea is to allow to give more control over how doctests are compiled to users. To do so, this PR adds a new `--doctest-compilation-args` option which provides extra compilation flags.
r? `@notriddle`
unimplement `PointerLike` for trait objects
Values of type `dyn* PointerLike` or `dyn PointerLike` are not pointer-like so these types should not implement `PointerLike`.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133226, `PointerLike` allows user implementations, so we can't just mark it with `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl(implement_via_object = false)]`. Instead, this PR splits the `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl(implement_via_object = ...)]` attribute into two separate attributes `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]` and `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]` so that we opt out of the automatic `impl PointerLike for dyn PointerLike` and still allow user implementations.
For traits that are marked with `#[do_not_implement_via_object]` but not `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]` I've also made it possible to add a manual `impl Trait for dyn Trait`. There is no immediate need for this, but it was one line to implement and seems nice to have.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134545
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134543
r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit splits the `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl(implement_via_object = ...)]` attribute
into two attributes `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]` and `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`.
This allows us to have special traits that can have user-defined impls but do not have the
automatic trait impl for trait objects (`impl Trait for dyn Trait`).
Fix logical error with what text is considered whitespace.
There appears to be a logical issue around what counts as leading white-space. There is code which does a subtraction assuming that no errors will be reported inside the leading whitespace. However we compute the length of that whitespace with std::char::is_whitespace and not rustc_lexer::is_whitespace. The former will include a no-break space while later will excluded it. We can only safely make the assumption that no errors will be reported in whitespace if it is all "Rust Standard" whitespace. Indeed an error does occur in unicode whitespace if it contains a no-break space. In that case the subtraction will cause a ICE (for a compiler in debug mode) as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132918.
The arbitrary self types v2 work introduces a check for shadowed
methods, whereby a method in some "outer" smart pointer type may called
in preference to a method in the inner referent. This is bad if the
outer pointer adds a method later, as it may change behavior, so we
ensure we error in this circumstance.
It was intended that this new shadowing detection system only comes into
play for users who enable the `arbitrary_self_types` feature (or of
course everyone later if it's stabilized). It was believed that the
new deshadowing code couldn't be reached without building the custom
smart pointers that `arbitrary_self_types` enables, and therefore there
was no risk of this code impacting existing users.
However, it turns out that cunning use of `Pin::get_ref` can cause
this type of shadowing error to be emitted now. This commit adds a test
for this case.
Make sure we handle `backwards_incompatible_lint` drops appropriately in drop elaboration
In #131326, a new kind of scheduled drop (`drop_kind: DropKind::Value` + `backwards_incompatible_lint: true`) was added so that we could insert a new kind of no-op MIR statement (`backward incompatible drop`) for linting purposes.
These drops were intended to have *no side-effects*, but drop elaboration code forgot to handle these drops specially and they were handled otherwise as normal drops in most of the code. This ends up being **unsound** since we insert more than one drop call for some values, which means that `Drop::drop` could be called more than once.
This PR fixes this by splitting out the `DropKind::ForLint` and adjusting the code. I'm not totally certain if all of the places I've adjusted are either reachable or correct, but I'm pretty certain that it's *more* correct than it was previously.
cc `@dingxiangfei2009`
r? nikomatsakis
Fixes#134482
Remove a duplicated check that doesn't do anything anymore.
fixes#134005
This code didn't actually `lub` the type of the previous expressions, but just the current type over and over again. Changing it to using the actual expression type does not change anything either, so may as well remove the entire loop.
coverage: Store coverage source regions as `Span` until codegen (take 2)
This is an attempt to re-land #133418:
> Historically, coverage spans were converted into line/column coordinates during the MIR instrumentation pass.
> This PR moves that conversion step into codegen, so that coverage spans spend most of their time stored as Span instead.
> In addition to being conceptually nicer, this also reduces the size of coverage mappings in MIR, because Span is smaller than 4x u32.
That PR was reverted by #133608, because in some circumstances not covered by our test suite we were emitting coverage metadata that was causing `llvm-cov` to exit with an error (#133606).
---
The implementation here is *mostly* the same, but adapted for subsequent changes in the relevant code (e.g. #134163).
I believe that the changes in #134163 should be sufficient to prevent the problem that required the original PR to be reverted. But I haven't been able to reproduce the original breakage in a regression test, and the `llvm-cov` error message is extremely unhelpful, so I can't completely rule out the possibility of this breaking again.
r? jieyouxu (reviewer of the original PR)
compiletest: don't register predefined `MSVC`/`NONMSVC` FileCheck prefixes
This was fragile as it was based on host target passed to compiletest,
but the user could cross-compile and run test for a different target
(e.g. cross from linux to msvc, but msvc won't be set on the target).
Furthermore, it was also very surprising as normally revision names
(other than `CHECK`) was accepted as FileCheck prefixes.
This partially reverts the `MSVC`/`NONMSVC` predefined FileCheck
prefix registration introduced historically for some codegen tests.
This makes some codegen tests more verbose since they now need to
explicitly introduce `MSVC`/`NONMSVC` revisions, but I think that's
less surprising, e.g.:
```rs
//@ revisions: MSVC NONMSVC
//`@[MSVC]` only-msvc
//`@[NONMSVC]` ignore-msvc
```
Note that revisions are not *only* FileCheck prefixes in
FileCheck-based test suites, as they also can be used
to conditionally apply certain compiletest directives.
r? `@Zalathar` (or reroll a `r/? compiletest` reviewer)
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw
This was fragile as it was based on host target passed to compiletest,
but the user could cross-compile and run test for a different target
(e.g. cross from linux to msvc, but msvc won't be set on the target).
Furthermore, it was also very surprising as normally revision names
(other than `CHECK`) was accepted as FileCheck prefixes.
Arbitrary self types v2 attempts to detect cases where methods in an
"outer" type (e.g. a smart pointer) might "shadow" methods in the
referent.
There are a couple of cases where the current code makes no attempt to
detect such shadowing. Both of these cases only apply if other unstable
features are enabled.
Add a test, mostly for illustrative purposes, so we can see the
shadowing cases that can occur.
Forbid overwriting types in typeck
While trying to figure out some type setting logic in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134248 I realized that we sometimes set a type twice. While hopefully that would have been the same type, we didn't ensure that at all and just silently accepted it. So now we reject setting it twice, unless errors are happening, then we don't care.
Best reviewed commit by commit.
No behaviour change is intended.
Fix intra doc links not generated inside footnote definitions
Fixes#132208.
The problem was that we were running the `Footnote` "pass" before the `LinkReplacer` one. Sadly, the change is bigger than it should because we can't specialize the `Iterator` trait implementation, forcing me to add a new type to handle the other `Iterator` kind (the one which still has the `Range`).
r? ``@notriddle``
Variants::Single: do not use invalid VariantIdx for uninhabited enums
~~Stacked on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133681, only the last commit is new.~~
Currently, `Variants::Single` for an empty enum contains a `VariantIdx` of 0; looking that up in the enum variant list will ICE. That's quite confusing. So let's fix that by adding a new `Variants::Empty` case for types that have 0 variants.
try-job: i686-msvc
cleanup region handling: add `LateParamRegionKind`
The second commit is to enable a split between `BoundRegionKind` and `LateParamRegionKind`, by avoiding `BoundRegionKind` where it isn't necessary.
The third comment then adds `LateParamRegionKind` to avoid having the same late-param region for separate bound regions. This fixes#124021.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Point at lint name instead of whole attr for gated lints
```
warning: unknown lint: `test_unstable_lint`
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:4:10
|
LL | #![allow(test_unstable_lint, another_unstable_lint)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the `test_unstable_lint` lint is unstable
= help: add `#![feature(test_unstable_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![warn(unknown_lints)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
warning: unknown lint: `test_unstable_lint`
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:4:29
|
LL | #![allow(test_unstable_lint, another_unstable_lint)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the `another_unstable_lint` lint is unstable
= help: add `#![feature(another_unstable_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
```
This is particularly relevant when there are multiple lints in the same `warn` attribute. Pointing at the smaller span makes it clearer which one the warning is complaining about.
Advent of `tests/ui` (misc cleanups and improvements) [3/N]
Part of #133895.
Misc improvements to some ui tests immediately under `tests/ui/`.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit. Each commit's commit message contains further elaboration and rationale for changes.
r? compiler
-Znext-solver: modify candidate preference rules
This implements the design proposed in the FCP in #132325 and matches the old solver behavior. I hope the inline comments are all sufficiently clear, I personally think this is a fairly clear improvement over the existing approach using `fn discard_impls_shadowed_by_env`. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/96.
This also fixes#133639 which encounters an ICE in negative coherence when evaluating the where-clause. Given the features required to trigger this ICE 🤷
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Stabilize `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]`
This PR seeks to stabilize the `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]`attribute.
This attribute was first proposed as `#[do_not_recommend`] attribute in RFC 2397 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2397). It gives the crate authors the ability to not suggest to the compiler to not show certain traits in its error messages.
With the presence of the `#[diagnostic]` tool attribute namespace it was decided to move the attribute there, as that lowers the amount of guarantees the compiler needs to give about the exact way this influences error messages. It turns the attribute into a hint which can be ignored. In addition to the original proposed functionality this attribute now also hides the marked trait in help messages ("This trait is implemented by: ").
The attribute does not accept any argument and can only be placed on trait implementations. If it is placed somewhere else a lint warning is emitted and the attribute is otherwise ignored. If an argument is detected a lint warning is emitted and the argument is ignored. This follows the rules outlined by the diagnostic namespace.
This attribute allows crates like diesel to improve their error messages drastically. The most common example here is the following error message:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: Expression` is not satisfied
--> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:53:15
|
LL | SelectInt.check("bar");
| ^^^^^ the trait `Expression` is not implemented for `&str`, which is required by `&str: AsExpression<Integer>`
|
= help: the following other types implement trait `Expression`:
Bound<T>
SelectInt
note: required for `&str` to implement `AsExpression<Integer>`
--> /home/weiznich/Documents/rust/rust/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend.rs:26:13
|
LL | impl<T, ST> AsExpression<ST> for T
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
LL | where
LL | T: Expression<SqlType = ST>,
| ------------------------ unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
By applying the new attribute to the wild card trait implementation of
`AsExpression` for `T: Expression` the error message becomes:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&str: AsExpression<Integer>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/as_expression.rs:55:15
|
LL | SelectInt.check("bar");
| ^^^^^ the trait `AsExpression<Integer>` is not implemented for `&str`
|
= help: the trait `AsExpression<Text>` is implemented for `&str`
= help: for that trait implementation, expected `Text`, found `Integer`
```
which makes it much easier for users to understand that they are facing a type mismatch.
Other explored example usages include:
* This standard library error message: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128008
* That bevy derived example:
e1f3068995/tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/supress_suggestions_in_help.rs (No
more tuple pyramids)
Fixes#51992
r? ``@compiler-errors``
This PR also adds a few more tests, makes sure that all the tests are run for the old and new trait solver and adds a check that the attribute does not contain arguments.
```
warning: unknown lint: `test_unstable_lint`
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:4:10
|
LL | #![allow(test_unstable_lint, another_unstable_lint)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the `test_unstable_lint` lint is unstable
= help: add `#![feature(test_unstable_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![warn(unknown_lints)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
warning: unknown lint: `test_unstable_lint`
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:4:29
|
LL | #![allow(test_unstable_lint, another_unstable_lint)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the `test_unstable_lint` lint is unstable
= help: add `#![feature(test_unstable_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/warn-unknown-unstable-lint-inline.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![warn(unknown_lints)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
This is particularly relevant when there are multiple lints in the same `warn` attribute. Pointing at the smaller span makes it clearer which one the warning is complaining about.
Use field init shorthand where possible
Field init shorthand allows writing initializers like `tcx: tcx` as
`tcx`. The compiler already uses it extensively. Fix the last few places
where it isn't yet used.
EDIT: this PR also updates `rustfmt.toml` to set
`use_field_init_shorthand = true`.
tests/assembly/asm: Remove uses of rustc_attrs and lang_items features by using minicore
Similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134385 (for tests/ui/asm), but for tests/assembly/asm.
r? jieyouxu
Clarify the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint's output
This makes a few changes:
- Rather than using the whole pattern as a span for the lint, this collects spans for each problematic default binding mode reset and labels them with why they're problems.
- The lint's suggestions are now verbose-styled, so that it's clear what's being suggested vs. what's problematic.
- The wording is now less technical, and the hard error version of this diagnostic now links to the same reference material as the lint (currently an unwritten page of the edition guide).
I'm not totally confident in the wording or formatting, so I'd appreciate feedback on that in particular. I tried to draw a connection with word choice between the labels and the suggestion, but it might be imprecise, unclear, or cluttered. If so, it might be worth making the labels more terse and adding notes that explain them, but that's harder to read in a way too.
cc ```@Nadrieril``` ```@Jules-Bertholet```
Closes#133854. For reference, the error from that issue becomes:
```
error: pattern uses features incompatible with edition 2024
--> $DIR/remove-me.rs:6:25
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| ^ ^ cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
| |
| cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
|
help: make the implied reference pattern explicit
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|&(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| +
```
