Implement `std::marker::Tuple`, use it in `extern "rust-call"` and `Fn`-family traits
Implements rust-lang/compiler-team#537
I made a few opinionated decisions in this implementation, specifically:
1. Enforcing `extern "rust-call"` on fn items during wfcheck,
2. Enforcing this for all functions (not just ones that have bodies),
3. Gating this `Tuple` marker trait behind its own feature, instead of grouping it into (e.g.) `unboxed_closures`.
Still needing to be done:
1. Enforce that `extern "rust-call"` `fn`-ptrs are well-formed only if they have 1/2 args and the second one implements `Tuple`. (Doing this would fix ICE in #66696.)
2. Deny all explicit/user `impl`s of the `Tuple` trait, kinda like `Sized`.
3. Fixing `Tuple` trait built-in impl for chalk, so that chalkification tests are un-broken.
Open questions:
1. Does this need t-lang or t-libs signoff?
Fixes#99820
fix a comment in UnsafeCell::new
There are several safe methods that access the inner value: `into_inner` has existed since forever and `get_mut` also exists since recently. So this comment seems just wrong. But `&self` methods return raw pointers and thus require unsafe code (though the methods themselves are still safe).
libtest: run all tests in their own thread, if supported by the host
This reverts the threading changes of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56243, which made it so that with `-j1`, the test harness does not spawn any threads. Those changes were done to enable Miri to run the test harness, but Miri supports threads nowadays, so this is no longer needed. Using a thread for each test is useful because the thread's name can be set to the test's name which makes panic messages consistent between `-j1` and `-j2` runs and also a bit more readable.
I did not revert the HashMap changes of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56243; using a deterministic map seems fine for the test harness and the more deterministic testing is the better.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59122
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70492
After rust-lang/rust#101946 this completes the move to cfg-if 1.0 by:
* Updating getrandom 0.1.14->0.1.16
* Updating panic_abort, panic_unwind, and unwind to cfg-if 1.0
Rewrite implementation of `#[alloc_error_handler]`
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes `#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like `#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom` function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call `__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with `default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of `default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
Include both benchmarks and tests in the numbers given to `TeFiltered{,Out}`
Fixes#103794
`#[bench]` is broken on nightly without this, sadly. It apparently has no test coverage. In addition to manually testing, I've added a run-make smokecheck for this (which would have caught the issue), but it would be nice to have a better way to test, err, libtest. For now we should get this in ASAP IMO
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes
`#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like
`#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by
the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom`
function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call
`__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with
`default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the
alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if
it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from
linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of
`default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
Do fewer passes and generally be more efficient when filtering tests
Follow-on of the work I started with this PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99939
Basically, the startup code for libtest is really inefficient, but that's not usually a problem because it is distributed in release and workloads are small. But under Miri which can be 100x slower than a debug build, these inefficiencies explode.
Most of the diff here is making test filtering single-pass. There are a few other small optimizations as well, but they are more straightforward.
With this PR, the startup time of the `iced` tests with `--features=code_asm,mvex` drops from 17 to 2 minutes (I think Miri has gotten slower under this workload since #99939). The easiest way to try this out is to set `MIRI_LIB_SRC` to a checkout of this branch when running `cargo +nightly miri test --features=code_asm,mvex`.
r? `@thomcc`
Prevent foreign Rust exceptions from being caught
Fix#102715
Use the address of a static variable (which is guaranteed to be unique per copy of std) to tell apart if a Rust exception comes from local or foreign Rust code, and abort for the latter.
poll_fn and Unpin: fix pinning
See [IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/surprising-soundness-trouble-around-pollfn/17484) for details: currently `poll_fn` is very subtle to use, since it does not pin the closure, so creating a `Pin::get_unchcked(&mut capture)` inside the closure is unsound. This leads to actual miscompilations with `futures::join!`.
IMO the proper fix is to pin the closure when the future is pinned, which is achieved by changing the `Unpin` implementation. This is a breaking change though. 1.64.0 was *just* released, so maybe this is still okay?
The alternative would be to add some strong comments to the docs saying that closure captures are *not pinned* and doing `Pin::get_unchecked` on them is unsound.
Clarify documentation about the memory layout of `UnsafeCell`
This PR addresses a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101717#issuecomment-1279908390) by `@RalfJung` in PR #101717 to further clarify the documentation of `UnsafeCell<T>`. The previous PR was merged already before we had a chance to correct this, hence this second PR :)
To goal of this PR is:
1. Split the paragraph about the memory layout of `UnsafeCell<T>` and the usage of `UnsafeCell::(raw_)get()` into two paragraphs, so that it is easier to digest for the reader.
2. Slightly simplify the previously added examples in order to reduce redundancy between the new examples and the examples that already [existed](ddd119b2fe/library/core/src/cell.rs (L1858-L1908)) before these 2 PRs (which remained untouched by both PRs).
