Add `AsFd` implementations for stdio lock types on WASI.
This mirrors the implementations on Unix platforms, and also mirrors the existing `AsRawFd` impls.
This is similar to #100892, but is for the `*Lock` types.
Fix in-place collection leak when remaining element destructor panic
Fixes#101628
cc `@the8472`
I went for the drop guard route, placing it immediately before the `forget_allocation_drop_remaining` call and after the comment, as to signal they are closely related.
I also updated the test to check for the leak, though the only change really needed was removing the leak clean up for miri since now that's no longer leaked.
Implement `Ready::into_inner()`
Tracking issue: #101196.
This implements a method to unwrap the value inside a `Ready` outside an async context.
See https://docs.rs/futures/0.3.24/futures/future/struct.Ready.html#method.into_inner for previous work.
This was discussed in [Zulip beforehand](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/.60Ready.3A.3Ainto_inner.28.29.60):
> An example I'm hitting right now:
I have a cross-platform library that provides a functions that returns a `Future`. The only reason why it returns a `Future` is because the WASM platform requires it, but the native doesn't, to make a cross-platform API that is equal for all I just return a `Ready` on the native targets.
>
> Now I would like to expose native-only functions that aren't async, that users can use to avoid having to deal with async when they are targeting native. With `into_inner` that's easily solvable now.
>
> I want to point out that some internal restructuring could be used to solve that problem too, but in this case it's not that simple, the library uses internal traits that return the `Future` already and playing around with that would introduce unnecessary `cfg` in a lot more places. So it is really only a quality-of-life feature.
Change the parameter name of From::from to `value`
The `From` trait is currently defined as:
```rust
pub trait From<T>: Sized {
fn from(_: T) -> Self;
}
```
The name of the argument is `_`. I am proposing to change it to `value`, ie.
```rust
pub trait From<T>: Sized {
fn from(value: T) -> Self;
}
```
This would be more consistent with the `TryFrom`, which looks like this:
```rust
pub trait TryFrom<T>: Sized {
type Error;
fn try_from(value: T) -> Result<Self, Self::Error>;
}
```
The reason for this proposal is twofold:
1. Consistency with the rest of the standard library. The `TryFrom` trait uses `value`, and no `From` implementation uses the default name (as it is quite useless).
2. When generating trait implementations with rust-analyzer/IntelliJ, the parameter name is copied, and it always has to be changed.
Optionally, another name like `x` could be used. I only propose `value` for consistency with `TryFrom`.
Changing parameter names is not a breaking change.
Note: this was originally posted as an internals thread [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/change-the-argument-name-of-from-from/17480)
Add T to PhantomData impl Debug
This add debug information for `PhantomData`, I believe it's make sense to add this to debug impl of `PhantomData` since `T` is what define what is the `PhantomData` just write `"PhantomData"` is not very useful for debugging.
Alternative:
* `PhantomData::<{}>`
* `PhantomData { t: "str_type" }`
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
introduce `{char, u8}::is_ascii_octdigit`
This feature adds two new APIs: `char::is_ascii_octdigit` and `u8::is_ascii_octdigit`, under the feature gate `is_ascii_octdigit`. These methods are shorthands for `char::is_digit(self, 8)` and `u8::is_digit(self, 8)`:
```rust
// core::char
impl char {
pub fn is_ascii_octdigit(self) -> bool;
}
// core::num
impl u8 {
pub fn is_ascii_octdigit(self) -> bool;
}
```
---
Couple of things I need help understanding:
- `const`ness: have I used the right attribute in this case?
- is there a way to run the tests for `core::char` alone, instead of `./x.py test library/core`?
docs: Improve AsRef / AsMut docs on blanket impls
There are several issues with the current state of `AsRef` and `AsMut` as [discussed here on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/semantics-of-asref/17016). See also #39397, #45742, #73390, #98905, and the FIXMEs [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.62.0/library/core/src/convert/mod.rs#L509-L515) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.62.0/library/core/src/convert/mod.rs#L530-L536). These issues are difficult to fix. This PR aims to update the documentation to better reflect the status-quo and to give advice on how `AsRef` and `AsMut` should be used.
In particular:
- Explicitly mention that `AsRef` and `AsMut` do not auto-dereference generally for all dereferencable types (but only if inner type is a shared and/or mutable reference)
- Give advice to not use `AsRef` or `AsMut` for the sole purpose of dereferencing
- Suggest providing a transitive `AsRef` or `AsMut` implementation for types which implement `Deref`
- Add new section "Reflexivity" in documentation comments for `AsRef` and `AsMut`
- Provide better example for `AsMut`
- Added heading "Relation to `Borrow`" in `AsRef`'s docs to improve structure
docs: be less harsh in wording for Vec::from_raw_parts
In particular, be clear that it is sound to specify memory not
originating from a previous `Vec` allocation. That is already suggested
in other parts of the documentation about zero-alloc conversions to Box<[T]>.
Incorporate a constraint from `slice::from_raw_parts` that was missing
but needs to be fulfilled, since a `Vec` can be converted into a slice.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98780.
Document the conditional existence of `alloc::sync` and `alloc::task`.
`alloc` declares
```rust
#[cfg(target_has_atomic = "ptr")]
pub mod sync;
```
but there is no public documentation of this condition. This PR fixes that, so that users of `alloc` can understand how to make their code compile everywhere `alloc` does, if they are writing a library with impls for `Arc`.
The wording is copied from `std::sync::atomic::AtomicPtr`, with additional advice on how to `#[cfg]` for it.
I feel quite uncertain about whether the paragraph I added to `Arc`'s documentation should actually be there, as it is a distraction for anyone using `std`. On the other hand, maybe more reminders that no_std exists would benefit the ecosystem.
Note: `target_has_atomic` is [stabilized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32976) but [not yet documented in the reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1171).
Improve documentation of `slice::{from_ptr_range, from_ptr_range_mut}`
Document panic conditions (`T` is a ZST) and sync docs of shared/unique version.
cc `@wx-csy`
Improve `FromStr` example
The `from_str` implementation from the example had an `unwrap` that would make it panic on invalid input strings. Instead of panicking, it nows returns an error to better reflect the intented behavior of the `FromStr` trait.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100451 (Do not panic when a test function returns Result::Err.)
- #102098 (Use fetch_update in sync::Weak::upgrade)
- #102538 (Give `def_span` the same SyntaxContext as `span_with_body`.)
- #102556 (Make `feature(const_btree_len)` implied by `feature(const_btree_new)`)
- #102566 (Add a known-bug test for #102498)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make `feature(const_btree_len)` implied by `feature(const_btree_new)`
...this should fix code that used the old feature that was changed in #102197
cc ```@davidtwco``` it seems like tidy doesn't check `implied_by`, should it?
Do not panic when a test function returns Result::Err.
Rust's test library allows test functions to return a `Result`, so that the test is deemed to have failed if the function returns a `Result::Err` variant. Currently, this works by having `Result` implement the `Termination` trait and asserting in assert_test_result that `Termination::report()` indicates successful completion. This turns a `Result::Err` into a panic, which is caught and unwound in the test library.
This approach is problematic in certain environments where one wishes to save on both binary size and compute resources when running tests by:
* Compiling all code with `--panic=abort` to avoid having to generate unwinding tables, and
* Running most tests in-process to avoid the overhead of spawning new processes.
This change removes the intermediate panic step and passes a `Result::Err` directly through to the test runner.
To do this, it modifies `assert_test_result` to return a `Result<(), String>` where the `Err` variant holds what was previously the panic message. It changes the types in the `TestFn` enum to return `Result<(), String>`.
This tries to minimise the changes to benchmark tests, so it calls `unwrap()` on the `Result` returned by `assert_test_result`, effectively keeping the same behaviour as before.
Some questions for reviewers:
* Does the change to the return types in the enum `TestFn` constitute a breaking change for the library API? Namely, the enum definition is public but the test library indicates that "Currently, not much of this is meant for users" and most of the library API appears to be marked unstable.
* Is there a way to test this change, i.e., to test that no panic occurs if a test returns `Result::Err`?
* Is there a shorter, more idiomatic way to fold `Result<Result<T,E>,E>` into a `Result<T,E>` than the `fold_err` function I added?
The `from_str` implementation from the example had an `unwrap` that would make it panic on invalid input strings. Instead of panicking, it nows returns an error to better reflect the intented behavior of the `FromStr` trait.
Update docs so that deprecated method points to relevant method
The docs for the deprecated 'park_timeout_ms' method suggests that the user 'use park_timeout' method instead (at https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/index.html).
Making a similar change so that the docs for the deprecated `sleep_ms` method suggest that the user `use sleep` method instead.
Add negation methods for signed non-zero integers.
Performing negation with defined wrapping semantics (such as `wrapping_neg()`) on a non-zero integer currently requires unpacking to a primitive and re-wrapping. Since negation of non-zero signed integers always produces a non-zero result, it is safe to implement the various `*_neg()` methods for `NonZeroI{N}`.
I'm not sure what to do about the `#[unstable(..., issue = "none")]` here -- should I file a tracking issue, or is that handled by the Rust dev team?
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/105
