Fixing #21475. Right now this code can not be parsed:
```rust
use m::{START, END};
fn main() {
match 42u32 {
m::START...m::END => {}, // error: expected one of `::`, `=>`, or `|`, found `...`
_ => {},
}
}
mod m {
pub const START: u32 = 4;
pub const END: u32 = 14;
}
```
I fixed the parser and added test for this case, but now there are still problems with mixing literals and paths in interval:
```rust
match 42u32 {
0u32...m::END => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
m::START...59u32 => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
_ => {},
}
}
```
I'll try fix this problem and need review.
This is one more step towards completing #13231
This series of commits add support for default trait implementations. The changes in this PR don't break existing code and they are expected to preserve the existing behavior in the compiler as far as built-in bounds checks go.
The PR adds negative implementations of `Send`/`Sync` for some types and it removes the special cases for `Send`/`Sync` during the trait obligations checks. That is, it now fully relies on the traits check rather than lang items.
Once this patch lands and a new snapshot is created, it'll be possible to add default impls for `Send` and `Sync` and remove entirely the use of `BuiltinBound::{BoundSend,BoundSync}` for positive implementations as well.
This PR also removes the restriction on negative implementations. That is, it is now possible to add negative implementations for traits other than `Send`/`Sync`
This is not a complete implementation of the RFC:
- only existing methods got updated, no new ones added
- doc comments are not extensive enough yet
- optimizations got lost and need to be reimplemented
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/528
Technically a
[breaking-change]
It's not clear what this means, because a macro in item position can expand to zero or more items. For now we disallow it, which is technically a
[breaking-change]
but is landing without an RFC. The `pub` keyword previously had no effect, which seems quite unintended.
Fixes#18317.
Fixes#14660.
It's not clear what this means, because a macro in item position can expand to
zero or more items. For now we disallow it, which is technically a
[breaking-change]
but is landing without an RFC. The `pub` keyword previously had no effect,
which seems quite unintended.
Fixes#18317.
Fixes#14660.
It is only allowed in paths now, where it will either work inside a `trait`
or `impl` item, or not resolve outside of it.
[breaking-change]
Closes#22137
Implement step 1 of rust-lang/rfcs#702
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
upgrade the inference based on expected type so that it is able to
infer the fn kind in isolation even if the full signature is not
available (and we could perhaps do better still in some cases, such as
extracting just the types of the arguments but not the return value).
This commits adds an associated type to the `FromStr` trait representing an
error payload for parses which do not succeed. The previous return value,
`Option<Self>` did not allow for this form of payload. After the associated type
was added, the following attributes were applied:
* `FromStr` is now stable
* `FromStr::Err` is now stable
* `FromStr::from_str` is now stable
* `StrExt::parse` is now stable
* `FromStr for bool` is now stable
* `FromStr for $float` is now stable
* `FromStr for $integral` is now stable
* Errors returned from stable `FromStr` implementations are stable
* Errors implement `Display` and `Error` (both impl blocks being `#[stable]`)
Closes#15138
the compiler that assumed two input types to assume two ouputs; we also have to teach `project.rs`
to project `Output` from the unboxed closure and fn traits.
