Pass features along during expansion
Use the set of passed features to detect uses of feature-gated macros without the corresponding feature enabled.
Fix#22234.
----
Also, the framework this add (passing along a reference to the features in the expansion context) is a necessary precursor for landing a properly feature-gated desugaring-based overloaded-`box` and placement-`in` (#22181).
----
This is fixing a bug, but since there might be code out there that is unknowingly taking advantage of that bug, I feel obligated to mark this as a:
[breaking-change]
Nonetheless, as this commit demonstrates, the previous commits was a [breaking-change].
In practice, breakage is focused on functions of this form:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: Box<FnMut()>)
````
where `FnMut()` could be any trait object type. The older scheme defaulted objects in argument
position so that they were bounded by a fresh lifetime:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(..., object: Box<FnMut()+'a>)
```
This meant that the object could contain borrowed data. The newer
scheme defaults to a lifetime bound of `'static`:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: Box<FnMut()+'static>)
```
This means that the object cannot contain borrowed data. In some cases, the best fix
is to stop using `Box`:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: &mut FnMut())
```
but another option is to write an explicit annotation for the `'a`
lifetime that used to be implicit. Both fixes are demonstrated in
this commit.
Fixes#21833.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
The tests in #21912 will also need `#[feature(no_std)]`. If you're okay with both PRs, I can merge and test them.
make `for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }` a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by @nikomatsakis (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of
ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding
the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop
itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by
niko (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here
is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a
semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e.,
it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot
actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test
by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new
striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
upgrade the inference based on expected type so that it is able to
infer the fn kind in isolation even if the full signature is not
available (and we could perhaps do better still in some cases, such as
extracting just the types of the arguments but not the return value).
fmt::Show is for debugging, and can and should be implemented for
all public types. This trait is used with `{:?}` syntax. There still
exists #[derive(Show)].
fmt::String is for types that faithfully be represented as a String.
Because of this, there is no way to derive fmt::String, all
implementations must be purposeful. It is used by the default format
syntax, `{}`.
This will break most instances of `{}`, since that now requires the type
to impl fmt::String. In most cases, replacing `{}` with `{:?}` is the
correct fix. Types that were being printed specifically for users should
receive a fmt::String implementation to fix this.
Part of #20013
[breaking-change]
Instead of copy-pasting the whole macro_rules! item from the original .rs file,
we serialize a separate name, attributes list, and body, the latter as
pretty-printed TTs. The compilation of macro_rules! macros is decoupled
somewhat from the expansion of macros in item position.
This filters out comments, and facilitates selective imports.
