Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
This'll still go via slices eventually for large arrays, but this way slice comparisons to short arrays can use the same memcmp-avoidance tricks.
Added some tests for all the combinations to make sure I didn't accidentally infinitely-recurse something.
Looser check for overflowing_binary_op
Fix for issue #91636 tight check resulted in ICE, this makes the check a little looser. It seems `eq` allows comparing of `supertype` and `subtype` if `lhs = supertype` and `rhs = subtype` but not vice versa, is this intended behavior ?
Return an error when `eval_rvalue_with_identities` fails
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Fixes#91725.
r? `@oli-obk`
Recover on invalid operators `<>` and `<=>`
Thanks to #89871 for showing me how to do this.
Next, I think it'd be nice to recover on `<=>` too, like #89871 intended, if this even works.
Make split_inclusive() on an empty slice yield an empty output
`[].split_inclusive()` currently yields a single, empty slice. That's
different from `"".split_inslusive()`, which yields no output at
all. I think that makes the slice version harder to use.
The case where I ran into this bug was when writing code for
generating a diff between two slices of bytes. I wanted to prefix
removed lines with "-" and a added lines with "+". Due to
`split_inclusive()`'s current behavior, that means that my code prints
just a "-" or "+" for empty files. I suspect most existing callers
have similar "bugs" (which would be fixed by this patch).
Closes#89716.
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Suggest to specify a target triple when lang item is missing
It is very common for newbies to embedded to hit this confusing error when forgetting to specify the target.
Source: me googling this error many times.
## Possible changes
* We could possibly restrict the note+help to only be included on eh_personality lang item if that helped reduce false positives, but its also possible doing so would just increase false negatives
* Open to any suggestions on rewriting the messages
* We could possibly remove the `.cargo/config` alternative to avoid the message getting too noisy but I think its valuable to have as its the correct approach for most embedded projects so that `cargo build` just works.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact
`try_reserve` of many collections were stablized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87993 in 1.57.0. Add `try_reserve` for the rest collections such as `BinaryHeap` should be not controversial.
Use spare_capacity_mut instead of invalid unchecked indexing when joining str
This is a fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91574
I think in general I'd prefer to see this code implemented with raw pointers or `MaybeUninit::write_slice`, but there's existing code in here based on copying from slice to slice, so converting everything from `&[T]` to `&[MaybeUninit<T>]` is less disruptive.
