feat: Use spans for builtin and declarative macro expansion errors
This should generally improve some error reporting for macro expansion errors. Especially for `compile_error!` within proc-macros
feat(ide-completion): explictly show `async` keyword on `impl trait` methods
OLD:
<img width="676" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6fa626f-6b6d-4c22-af27-b0755e7a6bf8">
Now:
<img width="684" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/efbaac0e-c805-4dd2-859d-3e44b2886dbb">
---
This is an preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/17719.
```rust
use std::future::Future;
trait DesugaredAsyncTrait {
fn foo(&self) -> impl Future<Output = usize> + Send;
fn bar(&self) -> impl Future<Output = usize> + Send;
}
struct Foo;
impl DesugaredAsyncTrait for Foo {
fn foo(&self) -> impl Future<Output = usize> + Send {
async { 1 }
}
//
async fn bar(&self) -> usize {
1
}
}
fn main() {
let fut = Foo.bar();
fn _assert_send<T: Send>(_: T) {}
_assert_send(fut);
}
```
If we don't distinguish `async` or not. It would be confusing to generate sugared version `async fn foo ....` and original form `fn foo` for `async fn in trait` that is defined in desugar form.
fix: let glob imports override other globs' visibility
Follow up to #14930Fixes#11858Fixes#14902Fixes#17704
I haven't reworked the code here at all - I don't feel confident in the codebase to do so - just rebased it onto the current main branch and fixed conflicts.
I'm not _entirely_ sure I understand the structure of the `check` function in `crates/hir-def/src/nameres` tests. I think the change to the test expectation from #14930 is correct, marking the `crate::reexport::inner` imports with `i`, and I understand it to mean there's a specific token in the import that we can match it to (in this case, `Trait`, `function` and `makro` of `pub use crate::defs::{Trait, function, makro};` respectively), but I had some trouble understanding the meaning of the different parts of `PerNs` to be sure.
Does this make sense?
I tested building and using RA locally with `cargo xtask install` and after this change the documentation for `arrow_array::ArrowPrimitiveType` seems to be picked up correctly!
feat: use vscode log format for client logs
This change updates the log format to use the vscode log format instead
of the custom log format, by replacing the `OutputChannel` with a
`LogOutputChannel` and using the `debug`, `info`, `warn`, and `error`
methods on it. This has the following benefits:
- Each log level now has its own color and the timestamp is in a more
standard format
- Inspect output (e.g. the log of the config object) is now colored
- Error stack traces are now shown in the output
- The log level is now controlled on the output tab by clicking the gear
icon and selecting "Debug" or by passing the `--log` parameter to
vscode. The `trace.extension` setting has been marked as deprecated.
Motivation:
The large uncolored unformatted log output with a large config object logged whenever it changes has always dominated the logs. This subjectively has made it that looking to see what the client is doing has always been a bit disappointing. That said, there's only 17 log messages total in the client. Hopefully by making the logs more visually useful this will encourage adding more appropriate debug level messages in future.
Incidentally, it might be worth only logging the config change message at a debug level instead of an info level to reduce the noise.
Bootstrap command refactoring: make command output API more bulletproof (step 7)
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127680.
This PR modifies the API of running commands to make it more explicit when a command is expected to produce programmatically handled output. Now if you call just `run`, you cannot access the stdout/stderr by accident, because it will not be returned to the caller.
This API change might be seen as overkill, let me know what do you think. In any case, I'd like to land the second commit, to make it harder to accidentally read stdout/stderr of commands that did not capture output (now you'd get an empty string as a result, but you should probably get a panic instead, if you try to read uncaptured stdout/stderr).
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126819
r? `@onur-ozkan`
try-job: x86_64-msvc
`#[naked]`: report incompatible attributes
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
this is a re-implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93809 by ``@bstrie`` which was closed 2 years ago due to inactivity.
This PR takes some of the final comments into account, specifically providing a little more context in error messages, and using an allow list to determine which attributes are compatible with `#[naked]`.
Notable attributes that are incompatible with `#[naked]` are:
* `#[inline]`
* `#[track_caller]`
* ~~`#[target_feature]`~~ (this is now allowed, see PR discussion)
* `#[test]`, `#[ignore]`, `#[should_panic]`
These attributes just directly conflict with what `#[naked]` should do.
Naked functions are still important for systems programming, embedded, and operating systems, so I'd like to move them forward.
This change updates the log format to use the vscode log format instead
of the custom log format, by replacing the `OutputChannel` with a
`LogOutputChannel` and using the `debug`, `info`, `warn`, and `error`
methods on it. This has the following benefits:
- Each log level now has its own color and the timestamp is in a more
standard format
- Inspect output (e.g. the log of the config object) is now colored
- Error stack traces are now shown in the output
- The log level is now controlled on the output tab by clicking the gear
icon and selecting "Debug" or by passing the `--log` parameter to
vscode. The `trace.extension` setting has been marked as deprecated.
Migrate `static-dylib-by-default`, `sanitizer-dylib-link`, `sanitizer-cdylib-link` and `sanitizer-staticlib-link` `run-make` tests to rmake
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
Please try:
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: test-various
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: x86_64-mingw
try-job: x86_64-gnu-llvm-18
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #125897 (from_ref, from_mut: clarify documentation)
- #128207 (improve error message when `global_asm!` uses `asm!` options)
- #128241 (Remove logic to suggest clone of function output)
- #128259 ([illumos/solaris] set MSG_NOSIGNAL while writing to sockets)
- #128262 (Delete `SimplifyArmIdentity` and `SimplifyBranchSame` tests)
- #128266 (update `rust.channel` default value documentation)
- #128267 (Add rustdoc GUI test to check title with and without search)
- #128271 (Disable jump threading of float equality)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable jump threading of float equality
Jump threading stores values as `u128` (`ScalarInt`) and does its comparisons for equality as integer comparisons.
This works great for integers. Sadly, not everything is an integer.
Floats famously have wonky equality semantcs, with `NaN!=NaN` and `0.0 == -0.0`. This does not match our beautiful integer bitpattern equality and therefore causes things to go horribly wrong.
While jump threading could be extended to support floats by remembering that they're floats in the value state and handling them properly, it's signficantly easier to just disable it for now.
fixes#128243
Delete `SimplifyArmIdentity` and `SimplifyBranchSame` tests
These two passes have already been deleted in #107256. I'm not sure why tidy didn't catch it.
As regression tests, I didn't delete `tests/ui/mir/issue-66851.rs` and `tests/ui/mir/simplify-branch-same.rs`.
r? compiler
[illumos/solaris] set MSG_NOSIGNAL while writing to sockets
Both these platforms have MSG_NOSIGNAL available, and we should set it for socket writes in the event that the SIGPIPE handler has been reset to SIG_DFL (i.e. terminate the process).
I've verified via a quick program at
https://github.com/sunshowers/msg-nosignal-test/ that even when the SIGPIPE handler is reset to SIG_DFL, writes to closed TCP sockets now error out with EPIPE. (Under ordinary circumstances UDP writes won't cause MSG_NOSIGNAL.)
However, I couldn't find any existing tests which verified the MSG_NOSIGNAL behavior.
Remove logic to suggest clone of function output
I can't exactly tell, but I believe that this suggestion is operating off of a heuristic that the lifetime of a function's input is correlated with the lifetime of a function's output in such a way that cloning would fix an error. I don't think that actually manages to hit the bar of "actually provides useful suggestions" most of the time.
Specifically, I've hit false-positives due to this suggestion *twice* when fixing ICEs in the compiler, so I don't think it's worthwhile having this logic around. Neither of the two affected UI tests are actually fixed by the suggestion.
improve error message when `global_asm!` uses `asm!` options
specifically, what was
error: expected one of `)`, `att_syntax`, or `raw`, found `preserves_flags`
--> $DIR/bad-options.rs:45:25
|
LL | global_asm!("", options(preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected one of `)`, `att_syntax`, or `raw`
is now
error: the `preserves_flags` option cannot be used with `global_asm!`
--> $DIR/bad-options.rs:45:25
|
LL | global_asm!("", options(preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the `preserves_flags` option is not meaningful for global-scoped inline assembly
mirroring the phrasing of the [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/inline-assembly.html#options).
This is also a bit of a refactor for a future `naked_asm!` macro (for use in `#[naked]` functions). Currently this sort of error can come up when switching from inline to global asm, or when a user just isn't that experienced with assembly. With `naked_asm!` added to the mix hitting this error is more likely.
from_ref, from_mut: clarify documentation
This was brought up [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56604#issuecomment-2143193486). The domain of quantification is generally always constrained by the type in the type signature, and I am not sure it's always worth spelling that out explicitly as that makes things exceedingly verbose. But since this was explicitly brought up, let's clarify.
#17497 - Invalid RA diagnostic error: expected 2 arguments, found 1
Fix for #17497
The issue occurs because in some configurations of traits where one of them has `Deref` as a supertrait, RA's type inference algorithm fails to resolve the `Deref::Target` type, and instead uses a `TyKind::BoundVar` (i.e. an unknown type). This "autoderefed" type then incorrectly acts as if it implements all traits in scope.
The fix is to re-apply the same sanity-check that is done in [`iterate_method_candidates_with_autoref()`](9463d9eea4/crates/hir-ty/src/method_resolution.rs (L1008)), that is: don't try to resolve methods on unknown types. This same sanity-check is now done on each autoderefed type for which trait methods are about to be checked. If the autoderefed type is unknown, then the iterating of the trait methods for that type is skipped.
Includes a unit test that only passes after applying the fixes in this commit.
Includes a change to the assertion count in test `syntax_highlighting::tests::benchmark_syntax_highlighting_parser` as suggested by Lukas Wirth during review.
Includes a change to the sanity-check code as suggested by Florian Diebold during review.
The issue occurs because in some configurations of traits where one of them has Deref as a supertrait, RA's type inference algorithm fails to resolve the Deref::Target type, and instead uses a TyKind::BoundVar (i.e. an unknown type). This "autoderefed" type then incorrectly acts as if it implements all traits in scope.
The fix is to re-apply the same sanity-check that is done in iterate_method_candidates_with_autoref(), that is: don't try to resolve methods on unknown types. This same sanity-check is now done on each autoderefed type for which trait methods are about to be checked. If the autoderefed type is unknown, then the iterating of the trait methods for that type is skipped.
Includes a unit test that only passes after applying the fixes in this commit.
Includes a change to the assertion count in test syntax_highlighting::tests::benchmark_syntax_highlighting_parser as suggested by Lukas Wirth during review.
Includes a change to the sanity-check code as suggested by Florian Diebold during review.
