Ignore `|` and `+` tokens during proc-macro pretty-print check
Fixes#76182
This is an alternative to PR #76188
These tokens are not preserved in the AST in certain cases
(e.g. a leading `|` in a pattern or a trailing `+` in a trait bound).
This PR ignores them entirely during the pretty-print/reparse check
to avoid spuriously using the re-parsed tokenstream.
We currently only attach tokens when parsing a `:stmt` matcher for a
`macro_rules!` macro. Proc-macro attributes on statements are still
unstable, and need additional work.
Fixes#76182
This is an alternative to PR #76188
These tokens are not preserved in the AST in certain cases
(e.g. a leading `|` in a pattern or a trailing `+` in a trait bound).
This PR ignores them entirely during the pretty-print/reparse check
to avoid spuriously using the re-parsed tokenstream.
Proc-macro API currently exposes jointness in `Punct` tokens. That is,
`+` in `+one` is **non** joint.
Our lexer produces jointness info for all tokens, so we need to censor
it *somewhere*
Previously we did this in a lexer, but it makes more sense to do this
in a proc-macro server.
Improve recovery on malformed format call
The token following a format expression should be a comma. However, when it is replaced with a similar token (such as a dot), then the corresponding error is emitted, but the token is treated as a comma, and the parsing step continues.
r? @petrochenkov
Restore public visibility on some parsing functions for rustfmt
In #74826 the visibility of several parsing functions was reduced. However, rustfmt is an external consumer of some of these functions as well and needs the visibility to be public, similar to other elements in rustc_parse such as `parse_ident`
db534b3ac2/src/librustc_parse/parser/mod.rs (L433-L436)
Previous implementation used the `Parser::parse_expr` function in order
to extract the format expression. If the first comma following the
format expression was mistakenly replaced with a dot, then the next
format expression was eaten by the function, because it looked as a
syntactically valid expression, which resulted in incorrectly spanned
error messages.
The way the format expression is exctracted is changed: we first look at
the first available token in the first argument supplied to the
`format!` macro call. If it is a string literal, then it is promoted as
a format expression immediatly, otherwise we fall back to the original
`parse_expr`-related method.
This allows us to ensure that the parser won't consume too much tokens
when a typo is made.
A test has been created so that it is ensured that the issue is properly
fixed.
