repr(transparent): it's fine if the one non-1-ZST field is a ZST
This code currently gets rejected:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
struct MyType([u16; 0])
```
That clearly seems like a bug to me: `repr(transparent)` [got defined ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77841#issuecomment-716575747) as having any number of 1-ZST fields plus optionally one more field; `MyType` clearly satisfies that definition.
This PR changes the `repr(transparent)` logic to actually match that definition.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114965 (Remove Drop impl of mpsc Receiver and (Sync)Sender)
- #115434 (make `Debug` impl for `ascii::Char` match that of `char`)
- #115477 (Stabilize the `Saturating` type)
- #115611 (add diagnostic for raw identifiers in format string)
- #115654 (improve PassMode docs)
- #115862 (Migrate `compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/callee.rs` to translatable diagnostics)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
add diagnostic for raw identifiers in format string
Format strings don't support raw identifiers (e.g. `format!("{r#type}")`), but they do support keywords in the format string directly (e.g. `format!("{type}")`). This PR improves the error output when attempting to use a raw identifier in a format string and adds a machine-applicable suggestion to remove the `r#`.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115466
`#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` without filters
This commit adds support for a `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute with the following options:
* `message` to customize the primary error message
* `note` to add a customized note message to an error message
* `label` to customize the label part of the error message
The relevant behavior is specified in [RFC-3366](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3366-diagnostic-attribute-namespace.html)
impl Step for IP addresses
ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#235
Note: since this is insta-stable, it requires an FCP.
Separating out from the bit operations PR since it feels logically disjoint, and so their FCPs can be separate.
closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields
This fixes the closure field capture part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115305: field capturing always stops at projections into packed structs, no matter the alignment of the field. This means changing a private field type from `u8` to `u64` can never change how closures capture fields, which is probably what we want.
Here's an example where, before this PR, changing the type of a private field in a repr(Rust) struct can change the output of a program:
```rust
#![allow(dead_code)]
mod m {
// before patch
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct S1(u8);
// after patch
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct S2(u64);
}
struct NoisyDrop;
impl Drop for NoisyDrop {
fn drop(&mut self) {
eprintln!("dropped!");
}
}
#[repr(packed)]
struct MyType {
field: m::S1, // output changes when this becomes S2
other_field: NoisyDrop,
third_field: Vec<()>,
}
fn test(r: MyType) {
let c = || {
let _val = std::ptr::addr_of!(r.field);
let _val = r.third_field;
};
drop(c);
eprintln!("before dropping");
}
fn main() {
test(MyType {
field: Default::default(),
other_field: NoisyDrop,
third_field: Vec::new(),
});
}
```
Of course this is a breaking change for the same reason that doing field capturing in the first place was a breaking change. Packed fields are relatively rare and depending on drop order is relatively rare, so I don't expect this to have much impact, but it's hard to be sure and even a crater run will only tell us so much.
Also see the [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115315#issuecomment-1702807825).
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-rfc-2229` `@ehuss`
Make useless_ptr_null_checks smarter about some std functions
This teaches the `useless_ptr_null_checks` lint that some std functions can't ever return null pointers, because they need to point to valid data, get references as input, etc.
This is achieved by introducing an `#[rustc_never_returns_null_ptr]` attribute and adding it to these std functions (gated behind bootstrap `cfg_attr`).
Later on, the attribute could maybe be used to tell LLVM that the returned pointer is never null. I don't expect much impact of that though, as the functions are pretty shallow and usually the input data is already never null.
Follow-up of PR #113657Fixes#114442
Fallback effects even if types also fallback
`||` is short circuiting, so if we do ty/int var fallback, we *don't* do effect fallback 😸
r? `@fee1-dead` or `@oli-obk`
Fixes#115791Fixes#115842
Improve invalid let expression handling
- Move all of the checks for valid let expression positions to parsing.
- Add a field to ExprKind::Let in AST/HIR to mark whether it's in a valid location.
- Suppress some later errors and MIR construction for invalid let expressions.
- Fix a (drop) scope issue that was also responsible for #104172.
Fixes#104172Fixes#104868
Paper over an accidental regression
r? types
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115781 (do not close issue until beta backport has been performed)
The PR reasons are explained with comments in the source.
In order to keep the diff simple, this PR effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113661, but only for RPITs. I will submit a follow up PR that fixes this correctly instead of just disabling the newly added check for RPITs. This PR should be significantly easier to review for beta backport
Properly consider binder vars in `HasTypeFlagsVisitor`
Given a PolyTraitRef like `for<'a> Ty: Trait` (where neither `Ty` nor `Trait` mention `'a`), we do *not* return true for `.has_type_flags(TypeFlags::HAS_LATE_BOUND)`, even though binders are supposed to act as if they have late-bound vars even if they don't mention them in their bound value: 31ae3b2bdb. This is because we use `HasTypeFlagsVisitor`, which only computes the type flags for `Ty`, `Const` and `Region` and `Predicates`, and we consequently skip any binders (and setting flags for their vars) that are not contained in one of these types.
This ends up causing a problem, because when we call `TyCtxt::erase_regions` (which both erases regions *and* anonymizes bound vars), we will skip such a PolyTraitRef, not anonymizing it, and therefore not making it structurally equal to other binders. This breaks vtable computations.
This PR computes the flags for all binders we enter in `HasTypeFlagsVisitor` if we're looking for `TypeFlags::HAS_LATE_BOUND` (or `TypeFlags::HAS_{RE,TY,CT}_LATE_BOUND`).
Fixes#115807
Fix the error message for `#![feature(no_coverage)]`
When #114656 was written, the feature flag to replace `no_coverage` was originally spelled `coverage`, but it was eventually changed to `coverage_attribute` instead.
That update happened to miss this error message in `removed.rs`, and unfortunately I only noticed just *after* the original PR was approved and merged.
cc ``@bossmc`` (original author) ``@oli-obk`` (original reviewer)
``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
some ConstValue refactoring
In particular, use AllocId instead of Allocation in ConstValue::ByRef. This helps avoid redundant AllocIds when a `ByRef` constant gets put back into the interpreter.
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105536
Rework `no_coverage` to `coverage(off)`
As discussed at the tail of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84605 this replaces the `no_coverage` attribute with a `coverage` attribute that takes sub-parameters (currently `off` and `on`) to control the coverage instrumentation.
Allows future-proofing for things like `coverage(off, reason="Tested live", issue="#12345")` or similar.
cleanup leftovers of const_err lint
Some code / comments seem to not have been updated when const_err was turned into a hard error, so we can do a bit of cleanup here.
r? `@oli-obk`
- Add doc comment to new type
- Restore "only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions" note
- Rename variant with clearer name
This commit adds support for a `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]`
attribute with the following options:
* `message` to customize the primary error message
* `note` to add a customized note message to an error message
* `label` to customize the label part of the error message
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
test ABI compatibility for some unsized types as well
and test for what `DispatchFromDyn` needs.
Also I ran this on a whole bunch of targets via Miri and added enough `cfg` to make it all work, as documentation for what does and doesn't currently work. (Most of those targets do not have their tests run on CI anyway.)
Here's the shell rune I used for that:
```
for TARGET in x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu x86_64-pc-windows-gnu aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu s390x-unknown-linux-gnu mips64-unknown-linux-gnuabi64 sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu wasm32-unknown-unknown; do
BOOTSTRAP_SKIP_TARGET_SANITY=1 ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args tests/ui/abi/compatibility.rs --target $TARGET;
done
```
