Currently, there are two conditional blocks that exist to check for "clang or gcc"
On line 866:
```
if [ -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
and on line 1019:
```
if [ -z "$CC" -a -z "$CFG_ENABLE_CLANG" -a -z "$CFG_GCC" ]
then
err "either clang or gcc is required"
fi
```
Given the order of the clauses, this results in the "either clang or gcc is required" error from the earlier block, (even) when CC is set.
The expected behaviour is to honour user-flags, in this case CC.
Aside from removing all hand-holdy compiler checks in favour of actual compiler *feature* checks, this change removes the redundant former block in favour of the latter block, which appears designed to allow the expected behaviour.
In all other places the IDs of link references are without spaces (and explicitly set).
These are just some cleanups I did for the PDF version.
r? @steveklabnik
I'm not sure why `core` is on but it's blocking the playpen. Doesn't seem to be needed but I'm not sure. It's not on the playpen template and playpen works on release and nightly.
Seems easier to understand without `take()`.
A few of us [over on the forum](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/string-type-coercion-in-rust/1439) have been tripped up by this distinction, which I don't think is mentioned. It's kind of logical if you read the "Deref coercions" page and squint a bit but I think it would be nice to explain it directly. Here's one way we could clarify it.
Functions such as `fn foo<I: Iterator>(x: I::Item)` would not
render correctly and displayed `I` instead of `I::Item`. Same thing
with `I::Item` appearing in where bounds.
This fixes the bug by using paths for generics.
Fixes#24417
Typo in explanation of difference between stack and heap values.
`baz` is called at the end of a call to `bar` inside another call to `foo`. `baz` takes a copy of the value `e` which should have a value of 9 if following the rest of the stack trace.
This PR fixes this typo and should close#25635.
This is a port of @eddyb's `const-fn` branch. I rebased it, tweaked a few things, and added tests as well as a feature gate. The set of tests is still pretty rudimentary, I'd appreciate suggestions on new tests to write. Also, a double-check that the feature-gate covers all necessary cases.
One question: currently, the feature-gate allows the *use* of const functions from stable code, just not the definition. This seems to fit our usual strategy, and implies that we might (perhaps) allow some constant functions in libstd someday, even before stabilizing const-fn, if we were willing to commit to the existence of const fns but found some details of their impl unsatisfactory.
r? @pnkfelix
`core::cell::Cell<T>` and `core::cell::RefCell<T>` currently implement
`PartialEq` when `T` does, and just defer to comparing `T` values.
There is no reason the same shouldn’t apply to `Eq`.
This enables `#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]` on e.g.
structs that have a `RefCell` field.
The recent MSVC patch made the build system pass explicit linkers to
rustc, but did not set that up for anything other than MSVC.
This is blocking nightlies.
