Since tutorial/manual files are stored on static.rust-lang.org, browsers
try to fetch the favicon from there while it should be retrieved from the
main domain.
This test was failing periodically on windows and other platforms, and in
debugging the issue locally I've found that the previous test was failing
at the assertion `ns0 <= ns1`. Upon inspecting the values, the two numbers were
very close to one another, but off by a little bit.
I believe that this is because `precise_time_s` goes from `u64` -> `f64` and
then we go again back to `u64` for the assertion. This conversion is a lossy one
that's not always guaranteed to succeed, so instead I've changed the test to
only compare against u64 instances.
This fills in some missing docs in the nums package. Let me know if this is on the right track for what's wanted for docs. I can probably fill in more in the future. Thanks.
(As a side note the precedence of the unary negative operator '-' tripped me up for a bit. Essentially I would expect `-25.0f32.sqrt()` to result in NaN instead of `-5.0`.)
I was benchmarking rust-http recently, and I saw that 50% of its time was spent
creating buffered readers/writers. Albeit rust-http wasn't using
std::rt::io::buffered, but the same idea applies here. It's much cheaper to
malloc a large region and not initialize it than to set it all to 0. Buffered
readers/writers never use uninitialized data, and their internal buffers are
encapsulated, so any usage of uninitialized slots are an implementation bug in
the readers/writers.
The UvProcess exit callback is called with a zero exit status and non-zero termination signal when a child is terminated by a signal.
If a parent checks only the exit status (for example, only checks the return value from `wait()`), it may believe the process completed successfully when it actually failed.
Helpers for common use-cases are in `std::rt::io::process`.
Should resolve https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/10062.
As we start to move runtime components into the crate map, it's becoming harder
and harder to start the runtime from a C function as rust is embedded in another
application. Right now if you compile a rust crate as a dynamic library which is
then linked to another application, when using std::rt::start there are no I/O
local services, even though rustuv was linked against and requested. The reason
for this is that there is no top level crate map available specifying where to
find libuv I/O.
This option is not meant to be used regularly, but rather whenever compiling a
final library crate and linking it into another application. This lifts the
requirement that to get a crate map you must have the final destination be an
executable.
Since the removal of privacy from resolve, this flag is no longer necessary to
get the test runner working. All of the privacy checks are bypassed by a special
item attribute in the privacy visitor.
Closes#4947
precise_time_ns
The QueryPerformance* functions take a LARGE_INTEGER, which is a signed
64-bit integer rather than an unsigned 64-bit integer. `ts.tv_sec`, too,
is a signed integer so `ns_per_s` has been changed to a int64_t.
The commit messages have more details, but this removes all analysis and usage related to fixed_stack_segment and rust_stack attributes. It's now the assumption that we always have "enough stack" and we'll implement detection of stack overflow through other means.
The stack overflow detection is currently implemented for rust functions, but it is unimplemented for C functions (we still don't have guard pages).
I increased this to 4MB when I implemented abort-on-stack-overflow for Rust
functions. Now that the fixed_stack_segment attribute is removed, no rust
function will ever reasonably request 2MB of stack (due to calling an FFI
function).
The default size of 2MB should be plenty for everyday use-cases, and tasks can
still request more stack via the spawning API.
These two attributes are no longer useful now that Rust has decided to leave
segmented stacks behind. It is assumed that the rust task's stack is always
large enough to make an FFI call (due to the stack being very large).
There's always the case of stack overflow, however, to consider. This does not
change the behavior of stack overflow in Rust. This is still normally triggered
by the __morestack function and aborts the whole process.
C stack overflow will continue to corrupt the stack, however (as it did before
this commit as well). The future improvement of a guard page at the end of every
rust stack is still unimplemented and is intended to be the mechanism through
which we attempt to detect C stack overflow.
Closes#8822Closes#10155
This was marked xfail-test
According to rust's issue #912, this will not be fixed.
There's no point in keeping the test if it is never intended to pass.
I was benchmarking rust-http recently, and I saw that 50% of its time was spent
creating buffered readers/writers. Albeit rust-http wasn't using
std::rt::io::buffered, but the same idea applies here. It's much cheaper to
malloc a large region and not initialize it than to set it all to 0. Buffered
readers/writers never use uninitialized data, and their internal buffers are
encapsulated, so any usage of uninitialized slots are an implementation bug in
the readers/writers.
As we start to move runtime components into the crate map, it's becoming harder
and harder to start the runtime from a C function as rust is embedded in another
application. Right now if you compile a rust crate as a dynamic library which is
then linked to another application, when using std::rt::start there are no I/O
local services, even though rustuv was linked against and requested. The reason
for this is that there is no top level crate map available specifying where to
find libuv I/O.
This option is not meant to be used regularly, but rather whenever compiling a
final library crate and linking it into another application. This lifts the
requirement that to get a crate map you must have the final destination be an
executable.
