Add `/System/iOSSupport` to the library search path on Mac Catalyst
On macOS, `/System/iOSSupport` contains iOS frameworks like UIKit, which is the whole idea of Mac Catalyst.
To link to these, we need to explicitly tell the linker about the support library stubs provided in the macOS SDK under the same path.
Concretely, when building a binary for Mac Catalyst, Xcode passes the following flags to the linker:
```
-iframework /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.2.sdk/System/iOSSupport/System/Library/Frameworks
-L/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.2.sdk/System/iOSSupport/usr/lib
```
This is not something that can be disabled (it's enabled as soon as you enable `SUPPORTS_MACCATALYST`), so I think it's pretty safe to say that we don't need an option to turn these off.
I've chosen to slightly deviate from what Xcode does and use `-F` instead of `-iframework`, since we don't need to change the header search path, and this way the flags nicely match on all the linkers. From what I could tell by reading Clang sources, there shouldn't be a difference when just running the linker.
CC `@BlackHoleFox,` `@shepmaster` (I accidentally let rustbot choose the reviewer).
zkvm: fix path to cmath in zkvm module
I don't know why the original author decided to use relative paths.
I think it would be better to use `use crate::sys::cmath;`
The according issue can be found here https://github.com/risc0/risc0/issues/1647
Remove `sys_common::thread`
Part of #117276.
The stack size calculation isn't system-specific at all and can just live together with the rest of the spawn logic.
typeck: fix `?` suggestion span
Noticed in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112043#issuecomment-2043565292>, if the
```
use the `?` operator to extract the `Result<(), std::fmt::Error>` value, propagating a `Result::Err` value to the caller
```
suggestion is applied to a macro that comes from a non-local crate (e.g. the stdlib), the suggestion span can become non-local, which will cause newer rustfix versions to fail.
This PR tries to remedy the problem by recursively probing ancestors of the expression span, trying to identify the most ancestor span that is (1) still local, and (2) still shares the same syntax context as the expression.
This is the same strategy used in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112043.
The test unfortunately cannot `//@ run-rustfix` because there are two conflicting MaybeIncorrect suggestions that when collectively applied, cause the fixed source file to become non-compilable.
Also avoid running `//@ run-rustfix` for `tests/ui/typeck/issue-112007-leaked-writeln-macro-internals.rs` because that also contains conflicting suggestions.
cc `@ehuss` who noticed this. This question mark span fix + not running rustfix on the tests containing conflicting MaybeIncorrect suggestions should hopefully unblock rustfix from updating.
The suggestion to use `let else` with an uninitialized refutable `let`
statement was erroneous: `let else` cannot be used with deferred
initialization.
Improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier
Resolves#123529
This PR improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier.
Update stdarch submodule
`asm_experimental_arch` is required in `core` as we're now using unstable inline assembly when building Arm64EC.
Brings in the fix for <https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/issues/1555> (cc `@tslnc04).`
r? `@Amanieu`
Call the panic hook for non-unwind panics in proc-macros
As I suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123286#issuecomment-2030344815.
If a proc macro causes a non-unwinding panic, `proc_macro` isn't able to catch the unwind and report the panic as a compile error by passing control back to the compiler. Our only chance to produce any diagnostic is the panic hook, so we should call it.
This scenario has already existed, but has become a lot more interesting now that we're adding more UB-detecting panics to the standard library, and such panics do not unwind.
Fix invalid silencing of parsing error
Given
```rust
macro_rules! a {
( ) => {
impl<'b> c for d {
e::<f'g>
}
};
}
```
ensure an error is emitted.
Fix#123079.
Add a `Debug` impl and some basic functions to `f16` and `f128`
`compiler_builtins` uses some convenience functions like `is_nan` and `is_sign_positive`. Add these, as well as a temporary implementation for `Debug` that prints the bit representation.
