Allow codegen to unsize `dyn*` to `dyn`
`dyn* Trait` is just another type that implements `Trait`, so we should be able to unsize `&dyn* Trait` into `&dyn Trait` perfectly fine, same for `Box` and other unsizeable types.
Fixes#106488
Migrate `codegen_ssa` to diagnostics structs - [Part 3]
Completes migrating `codegen_ssa` module except 2 outstanding errors that depend on other crates:
1. [`rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError`](b6097f2e1b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs (L475)): I saw `rustc_middle` is unassigned, I am open to take this work.
2. `codegen_llvm`'s use of `fn span_invalid_monomorphization_error`, which I started to replace in the [last commit](9a31b3cdda) of this PR, but would like to know the team's preference on how we should keep replacing the other macros:
2.1. Update macros to expect a `Diagnostic`
2.2. Remove macros and expand the code on each use.
See [some examples of the different options in this experimental commit](64aee83e80)
_Part 2 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103792_
r? ``@davidtwco``
Cc ``@compiler-errors``
Small fixes for --crate-type staticlib
The first commit doesn't have an effect until we start translating error messages. The second commit fixes potential linker errors when combining `--crate-type staticlib` with another crate type and I think `-Cprefer-dynamic`.
On macOS, it's not yet clear which cases of clang/OS/target/SDK version impact
how to find ld/lld/rust-lld. The --target is not needed on our current targets with
a vanilla config, but may be in some cases. Specifying it all the time breaks the 10.7+
targets on x64 macOS.
We try to only specify it on macOS if the linker flavors are different,
for possible cases of cross-compilation with `-Zgcc-ld=lld` but the
expectation is that it should be passed manually when needed in these
situations.
Don't perform invalid checks in `codegen_attrs`
The attributes `#[track_caller]` and `#[cmse_nonsecure_entry]` are only valid on functions. When validating one of these attributes, codegen_attrs previously called `fn_sig`, [which can only be used on functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105201), on the item the attribute was attached to, assuming that the item was a function without checking. This led to [ICEs in situations where the attribute was incorrectly used on non-functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105594).
With this change, we skip calling `fn_sig` if the item the attribute is attached to must be a function but isn't, because `check_attr` will reject such cases without codegen_attrs's intervention.
As a side note, some of the attributes in codegen_attrs are only valid on functions, but that property isn't actually checked. I'm planning to fix that in a follow up PR since it's a behavior change that will need to be validated rather than an obvious bugfix. Thankfully, all the attributes like that I've found so far are unstable.
Fixes#105594.
r? `@cjgillot`
Remove wrapper functions for some unstable options
They are trivial and just forward to the option. Like most other options, we can just access it directly.
abort immediately on bad mem::zeroed/uninit
Now that we have non-unwinding panics, let's use them for these assertions. This re-establishes the property that `mem::uninitialized` and `mem::zeroed` will never unwind -- the earlier approach of causing panics here sometimes led to hard-to-debug segfaults when the surrounding code was not able to cope with the unexpected unwinding.
Cc `@bjorn3` I did not touch cranelift but I assume it needs a similar patch. However it has a `codegen_panic` abstraction that I did not want to touch since I didn't know how else it is used.
Rename `assert_uninit_valid` intrinsic
It's not about "uninit" anymore but about "filling with 0x01 bytes" so the name should at least try to reflect that.
This is actually not fully correct though, as it does still panic for all uninit with `-Zstrict-init-checks`. I'm not sure what the best way is to deal with that not causing confusion. I guess we could just remove the flag? I don't think having it makes a lot of sense anymore with the direction that we have chose to go. It could be relevant again if #100423 lands so removing it may be a bit over eager.
r? `@RalfJung`
Some attributes are only valid on function items. When checking these
attributes, codegen_attrs previously sometimes called `fn_sig` on the
item they were attached to without first ensuring that the item was a
function. This led to an ICE (#105594), since `fn_sig` can
only be called on functions.
After this change, we skip calling `fn_sig` if the item the attribute is
attached to must be a function but invalidly isn't, because `check_attr`
will reject such cases without codegen_attrs's intervention.
Combine `ty::Projection` and `ty::Opaque` into `ty::Alias`
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/79.
This PR consolidates `ty::Projection` and `ty::Opaque` into a single `ty::Alias`, with an `AliasKind` and `AliasTy` type (renamed from `ty::ProjectionTy`, which is the inner data of `ty::Projection`) defined as so:
```
enum AliasKind {
Projection,
Opaque,
}
struct AliasTy<'tcx> {
def_id: DefId,
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
}
```
Since we don't have access to `TyCtxt` in type flags computation, and because repeatedly calling `DefKind` on the def-id is expensive, these two types are distinguished with `ty::AliasKind`, conveniently glob-imported into `ty::{Projection, Opaque}`. For example:
```diff
match ty.kind() {
- ty::Opaque(..) =>
+ ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ..) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
This PR also consolidates match arms that treated `ty::Opaque` and `ty::Projection` identically.
r? `@ghost`
Use struct types during codegen in less places
This makes it easier to use cg_ssa from a backend like Cranelift that doesn't have any struct types at all. After this PR struct types are still used for function arguments and return values. Removing those usages is harder but should still be doable.
