Capture lifetimes for associated type bounds destined to be lowered to opaques
Some associated type bounds get lowered to opaques, but they're not represented in the AST as opaques.
That means that we never collect lifetimes for them (`record_lifetime_params_for_impl_trait`) which are used currently for RPITITs, which capture all of their in-scope lifetimes[^1]. This means that the nested RPITITs that arise from some type like `impl Foo<Type: Bar>` (~> `impl Foo<Type = impl Bar>`) don't capture any lifetimes, leading to ICEs.
This PR makes sure we collect the lifetimes for associated type bounds as well, and make sure that they are set up correctly for opaque type lowering later.
Fixes#115360
[^1]: #114489
resolve: Stop creating `NameBinding`s on every use, create them once per definition instead
`NameBinding` values are supposed to be unique, use referential equality, and be created once for every name declaration.
Before this PR many `NameBinding`s were created on name use, rather than on name declaration, because it's sufficiently cheap, and comparisons are not actually used in practice for some binding kinds.
This PR makes `NameBinding`s consistently unique and created on name declaration.
There are two special cases
- for extern prelude names creating `NameBinding` requires loading the corresponding crate, which is expensive, so such bindings are created lazily on first use, but they still keep the uniqueness by being reused on further uses.
- for legacy derive helpers (helper attributes written before derives that introduce them) the declaration and the use is basically the same thing (that's one of the reasons why they are deprecated), so they are still created on use, but we can still maybe do a bit better in a way that I described in FIXME in the last commit.
Warn on elided lifetimes in associated constants (`ELIDED_LIFETIMES_IN_ASSOCIATED_CONSTANT`)
Elided lifetimes in associated constants (in impls) erroneously resolve to fresh lifetime parameters on the impl since #97313. This is not correct behavior (see #38831).
I originally opened #114716 to fix this, but given the time that has passed, the crater results seem pretty bad: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114716#issuecomment-1682091952
This PR alternatively implements a lint against this behavior, and I'm hoping to bump this to deny in a few versions.
Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind`
Previously, we would treat paths referring to type aliases as *lazy* type aliases if the current crate had lazy type aliases enabled independently of whether the crate which the alias was defined in had the feature enabled or not.
With this PR, the laziness of a type alias depends on the crate it is defined in. This generally makes more sense to me especially if / once lazy type aliases become the default in a new edition and we need to think about *edition interoperability*:
Consider the hypothetical case where the dependency crate has an older edition (and thus eager type aliases), it exports a type alias with bounds & a where-clause (which are void but technically valid), the dependent crate has the latest edition (and thus lazy type aliases) and it uses that type alias. Arguably, the bounds should *not* be checked since at any time, the dependency crate should be allowed to change the bounds at will with a *non*-major version bump & without negatively affecting downstream crates.
As for the reverse case (dependency: lazy type aliases, dependent: eager type aliases), I guess it rules out anything from slight confusion to mild annoyance from upstream crate authors that would be caused by the compiler ignoring the bounds of their type aliases in downstream crates with older editions.
---
This fixes#114468 since before, my assumption that the type alias associated with a given weak projection was lazy (and therefore had its variances computed) did not necessarily hold in cross-crate scenarios (which [I kinda had a hunch about](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114253#discussion_r1278608099)) as outlined above. Now it does hold.
`@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias
r? `@oli-obk`
Consolidate opaque ty and async fn lowering code
The codepaths for lowering "regular" opaques and async fn were almost identical, modulo some bookkeeping that seemed pretty easy to consolidate.
r? `@cjgillot`
Resolve visibility paths as modules not as types.
Asking for a resolution with `opt_ns = Some(TypeNS)` allows path resolution to look for type-relative paths, leaving unresolved segments behind. However, for visibility paths we really need to look for a module, so we need to pass `opt_ns = None`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109146
r? `@petrochenkov`
Improve spans for indexing expressions
fixes#114388
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part, but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
r? compiler-errors
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary
left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part
of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part,
but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use
indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and
that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an
extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
It lints against features that are inteded to be internal to the
compiler and standard library. Implements MCP #596.
We allow `internal_features` in the standard library and compiler as those
use many features and this _is_ the standard library from the "internal to the compiler and
standard library" after all.
Marking some features as internal wasn't exactly the most scientific approach, I just marked some
mostly obvious features. While there is a categorization in the macro,
it's not very well upheld (should probably be fixed in another PR).
We always pass `-Ainternal_features` in the testsuite
About 400 UI tests and several other tests use internal features.
Instead of throwing the attribute on each one, just always allow them.
There's nothing wrong with testing internal features^^
fix(resolve): update the ambiguity glob binding as warning recursively
Fixes#47525Fixes#56593, but `issue-56593-2.rs` is not fixed to ensure backward compatibility.
Fixes#98467Fixes#105235Fixes#112713
This PR had added a field called `warn_ambiguous` in `NameBinding` which is only for back compatibly reason and used for lint.
More details: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112743
r? `@petrochenkov`
fix(resolve): skip panic when resolution is dummy
Fixes#113953
Skip the panic when the binding refers to a dummy node during the finalization.
r? `@petrochenkov`
